pharaoh fortune slot
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
December 10, 2018, 05:30:26 PM

Login with username, password and session length
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 14
1  Microsoft (MCSE, MCSD, MOUS, MCAD) / Server 2003 / Passed 70-298 on: October 16, 2004, 10:17:34 AM
Second time around.
Senario based Q's. I found this exame to be questionable. Besides being pissed off because it took me 2 F'n goes at it.
2  Microsoft (MCSE, MCSD, MOUS, MCAD) / Server 2003 / Well done on: October 16, 2004, 09:46:54 AM
All the Best for the next one;)
3  Microsoft (MCSE, MCSD, MOUS, MCAD) / Server 2003 / Passed 294 on: September 20, 2004, 10:10:14 AM
Passed 802/1000
Extremely badly worded exam.
34 Q beta exam.
I thought they got rid of that crap.
4  Microsoft (MCSE, MCSD, MOUS, MCAD) / Server 2003 / Terminal Services Help on: July 08, 2004, 02:06:21 AM
Check that per device in licensing is not select. This can take temp licenses.
5  Microsoft (MCSE, MCSD, MOUS, MCAD) / 70-227 / Passed on: July 08, 2004, 01:57:33 AM
Passed the ISA 2000 today
808/1000 I didn't find this easy.
Probably the 2nd hardest exam I've sat. The Beast being the hardest.
This was not a confident pass.
30 Q's run of the mill.
20 Q's that where trying to split hair.
10 Q's no idea (educated guess)
2 Q's I'm sure the writer had his head shoved up the proverbial.

Don't take this one lightly
Overall I was quite pissed off with myself.
6  Microsoft (MCSE, MCSD, MOUS, MCAD) / Server 2003 / Passed 70-292 on: June 06, 2004, 11:16:27 AM

All the best for the next one.
7  General discussions / General Discussion / Is examnotes dead? on: June 06, 2004, 11:08:22 AM
Deja-vue is partially right, though it is up to the members to stay within the post; on subject matter and no bitching.
We are learned therefore we should be above the flaming.

luisjo; I would agree, but it is up to the members to create an interesting environment and to keep things moving.

This may end in the someone-else syndrome which I believe is happening currently.

With all due respect and no criminal intent, but I find it disheartening when senior members and moderators waste 2 pages on discussing flicks. Know wonder new members don't come back and it makes it easier for trolls and gutter crawlers to take up residents.Sad
8  Microsoft (MCSE, MCSD, MOUS, MCAD) / Server 2003 / Number of MCP web site on: May 26, 2004, 09:25:31 AM
Thanks Thunder Cloud
9  Microsoft (MCSE, MCSD, MOUS, MCAD) / Server 2003 / Number of MCP web site on: May 25, 2004, 09:50:25 AM
Hi all
Can some-one post a link to msp web site that list the numbers of MCSE's, MCSA's and MCP's.

I have three trainees that think they know it and are not interested in certification.

I would like to show them what they're up against.

Thanks to who can help.
10  Microsoft (MCSE, MCSD, MOUS, MCAD) / Server 2003 / 70-292 gone but not forgoten (Passed) on: May 25, 2004, 09:44:11 AM
Thanks to all that visited or posted.

All the best for the next one:)
11  Microsoft (MCSE, MCSD, MOUS, MCAD) / Server 2003 / 70-292 gone but not forgoten (Passed) on: May 18, 2004, 10:04:11 AM
Finally pulled my finger out.
Fair exam, no rabbit out of the hat trick for M$.

Run of the mill DNS
Forwarders, NS records, Stub Zones, replcators. :- no drawn out senarios
(some exhibits)

Shadow copies when/how and why based Q's
Based on creation and how to setup plus user access.

Share and NTFS Q's more realistic than the 2000 stuff.

Terminal server Q's mainly policies, stuff you would normally expect.

Access based policies
Auditing object for success/failure
Where abouts to place different types of policies in AD for Users and Computers such as security/logon/logon locally/access objects.

Run of the mill backup procedures. User data System State. Creation of ASR disk

Restore from ASR.
non authoritive/authoritive restore of CA's/AD
Restore from tape.

I'll give this to M$. Better written Q's and more realistic senarios.

They even gave me a score
12  Microsoft (MCSE, MCSD, MOUS, MCAD) / Server 2003 / Dilemna! on: May 16, 2004, 10:39:30 AM
It depends on what your doing. I'm going for my upgrade: Reason, about 60% of my time is spent on W2K3 servers.
So if your main work is W2K servers does it benifit you if you upgrade.
Well yep I'm going for it on Tuesday.

All the best on your choice.
13  Microsoft (MCSE, MCSD, MOUS, MCAD) / Server 2003 / congrats on: May 09, 2004, 10:47:56 AM
good on ya

All the best for the next one
14  Microsoft (MCSE, MCSD, MOUS, MCAD) / Windows 2000 track general / Any MCSE's starting Cisco certification? on: November 18, 2003, 05:58:31 AM
Information Technology Infrastructure Libary:

It is a set of guide lines on the management on supporting environment infrastructure:

ITIL is about aligning IT Services with business requirements:

Its a set of guidelines (best practice) that can be varied from organisations to organisation

I have found it very informative because it tie's up loose ends that other certs don't mention or touch.
15  Microsoft (MCSE, MCSD, MOUS, MCAD) / Windows 2000 track general / My 2 cents worth on: November 17, 2003, 10:01:24 AM
Im 3 steps from getting my MCSE. I already have the CCNA and CNA.
As for the CCNA as long as you have a router and switch to play with at home this will keep your skills up.
I've only had to touch routers about 3 times in the past 18 months. These where two emergency cases and a router and switch upgrade.
So was it worth the study, yes because it saved my butt.

As a Network admin or Network Engineer it is worth having this knowledge.

Only problem is that the certs age.
So I took a side step and did the first of the ITIL exams. This doesn't age.

Seriously considering to do the ITIL Professional exam.
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 14
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.13 | SMF © 2006-2011, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!