Hi,

Is anybody there? Whohooo?!? Anyone...

I'm kidding...

Anyone used the Readiness Review for 219? I'm also using Transcenders.

My scores in the practice test are deceiving me. I already read Chapter 9, 2 times.

{}'s

Report this post to a moderator

Your scores are too low or too high?

Report this post to a moderator

jeff,

I've got in the 5 CS's - respectively - 46.15%, 50%, 46.15%, 61.54% and 78.57%.

I'll start to use Transcenders next weekend... Hey, for those who'll take this exam Technet has o lot of useful material about AD Design...

Thanks jeff!

{}'s

Report this post to a moderator

So how are you doing on the interactive questions? Those are weighted pretty heavily.

Report this post to a moderator

Jeff,

Actually, I just read the book... I'll practice with the eletronic assesment test after using Transcenders.
By the way, what do you think about Transcenders for 219?

{}'s

Report this post to a moderator

I only used the free trial version, compare it to the free trial version of 219 at T e c h s k i l l s.com. I liked that one more.

Report this post to a moderator

Thanks jeff...
I'm planning to take this one in 2/14, but i'm not sure at all.

{}'s

Report this post to a moderator

Hi All, I'm going to try this one next also.

Jeff, I have downloaded the Techskills free demo, I would like to clarify some of the terminology.

I beleive its the 4th question in the first scenario asks 'How many forests and domains should you create for You go! corporation?'

the answer is shown as 'one forest and three domains', I am assuming they use the term 'forest' to refer to the forest root domain, and then 3 child domains, one for each site. so there are actually 4 domains being created.

Also, how does one get around the problem of having the forest root domain appearing to be a child domain of the internet namespace. how can the forest root be subordinate to the internet namespace and still be the root. are there not trust issue problems with transitive trusts between the private network and the public namespace?

__________________
RJ

The secret to a successful life is learning what to least expect the most...

http://www.cbc.ca/
http://www.vancouver.cbc.ca/
http://english.aljazeera.net/HomePage/
http://www.cnn.com/

Last edited by me? I dunno... on 02-07-03 at 06:03 PM

Report this post to a moderator

I used tranceder for about two weeks and all it did was get me used to the format. Most of the Questions are very easy if you've taken 217

Report this post to a moderator

me? I dunno...

I don't have it loaded up right now to see what the actual scenario is.

In terms of transitive trusts, you would still have entire control over group memberships and permissions from one domain to the next, so this is not as big of an issue as it might sound.

You can make a forest with an empty root domain, or the root domain of your domain tree can also serve as the forest root. Forest in this context is a container, containing whatever domains and domain trees you establish.

Example: a single AD domain is still a forest. So you would have one forest and one domain.

Another example: My workplace is getting ready to implement AD. They are going to have an empty root domain (populated by enterprise and schema admins), a domain for the public namespace (website), and a domain tree with a child domain for each continent that they have offices in.

So it would be entirely possible that you could have the answer that was given: one forest, three domains, with the first domain or the root of the domain tree acting as the forest root as well.

Report this post to a moderator