











|  |
| Author |
[OT] Automibiles vs Computers
|
Andy Clayton
Guest
Registered: Not Yet Location: Country: State: Certifications: Working on:
Total Posts: N/A
|
|
[OT] Automibiles vs Computers
Suppose for a moment that the automobile industry had developed at the same
rate as computers and over the same period: how much cheaper and more
efficient would the current models be? If you have not already heard the
analogy, the answer is shattering. Today you would be able to buy a
Rolls-Royce for $2.75, it would do three million miles to the gallon, and it
would deliver enough power to drive the Queen Elizabeth II. And if you were
interested in miniaturization, you could place half a dozen of them on a
pinhead.
-- Christopher Evans
Report this post to a moderator
|
|
12-05-02 07:24 AM
|
|
Kurt
Guest
Registered: Not Yet Location: Country: State: Certifications: Working on:
Total Posts: N/A
|
|
Re: [OT] Automibiles vs Computers
In article <ZICH9.486267$H65.54025@post-02.news.easynews.com>, Andy Clayton wrote:
> Suppose for a moment that the automobile industry had developed at the same
So, is there anyone who has not read this, say, a decade ago. My favorite
variation is when Bill Gates was trying to be a smartass and GM's response
was perfect:
http://www.crisinc.addr.com/FUN/gmvms.htm
- Kurt
Report this post to a moderator
|
|
12-05-02 07:24 AM
|
|
Alexis
Guest
Registered: Not Yet Location: Country: State: Certifications: Working on:
Total Posts: N/A
|
|
Re: [OT] Automibiles vs Computers
On Thu, 05 Dec 2002 07:19:37 +0000, Kurt wrote:
> In article <ZICH9.486267$H65.54025@post-02.news.easynews.com>, Andy Clayton wrote:
>> Suppose for a moment that the automobile industry had developed at the same
>
> So, is there anyone who has not read this, say, a decade ago. My favorite
> variation is when Bill Gates was trying to be a smartass and GM's response
> was perfect:
>
> http://www.crisinc.addr.com/FUN/gmvms.htm
>
> - Kurt
Rofl!
Alexis
Report this post to a moderator
|
|
12-05-02 07:25 PM
|
|
Andy Clayton
Guest
Registered: Not Yet Location: Country: State: Certifications: Working on:
Total Posts: N/A
|
|
Re: [OT] Automibiles vs Computers
Kurt wrote:
> In article <ZICH9.486267$H65.54025@post-02.news.easynews.com>, Andy Clayton
> wrote:
>> Suppose for a moment that the automobile industry had developed at the same
>
> So, is there anyone who has not read this, say, a decade ago. My favorite
> variation is when Bill Gates was trying to be a smartass and GM's response
> was perfect:
>
> http://www.crisinc.addr.com/FUN/gmvms.htm
>
> - Kurt
That one is great ! )
LOL
Report this post to a moderator
|
|
12-06-02 04:24 PM
|
|
Rassman
Guest
Registered: Not Yet Location: Country: State: Certifications: Working on:
Total Posts: N/A
|
|
Re: [OT] Automibiles vs Computers
"Andy Clayton" <not@home.org> wrote in message
news:ZICH9.486267$H65.54025@post-02.news.easynews.com...
> Suppose for a moment that the automobile industry had developed at the
same
> rate as computers and over the same period: how much cheaper and more
> efficient would the current models be? If you have not already heard the
> analogy, the answer is shattering. Today you would be able to buy a
> Rolls-Royce for $2.75, it would do three million miles to the gallon, and
it
> would deliver enough power to drive the Queen Elizabeth II. And if you
were
> interested in miniaturization, you could place half a dozen of them on a
> pinhead.
> -- Christopher Evans
Yes but have you tried to get drivers for one of those? MDK doesn't have
any.
Report this post to a moderator
|
|
12-06-02 06:24 PM
|
|
Bill Marcum
Guest
Registered: Not Yet Location: Country: State: Certifications: Working on:
Total Posts: N/A
|
|
Re: [OT] Automibiles vs Computers
On Thu, 05 Dec 2002 07:19:37 GMT,
Kurt <actinouranium@netscape.net> wrote:
> In article <ZICH9.486267$H65.54025@post-02.news.easynews.com>, Andy Clayton wrote:
>> Suppose for a moment that the automobile industry had developed at the same
>
> So, is there anyone who has not read this, say, a decade ago. My favorite
> variation is when Bill Gates was trying to be a smartass and GM's response
> was perfect:
>
> http://www.crisinc.addr.com/FUN/gmvms.htm
>
6. The oil, water temperature and alternator warning lights would be
replaced by one "general car default" warning light.
s/general car default/check engine/
Report this post to a moderator
|
|
12-06-02 10:24 PM
|
|
|
Forum Rules: Who Can Read The Forum? Any registered user or guest.
Who Can Post New Topics? Any registered user.
Who Can Post Replies? Any registered user.
Changes: Messages can be edited by their author.
Posts: HTML code is OFF. Smilies are ON. vB code is ON. [IMG] code is OFF. |
|
ExamNotes forum archive
|