











CompTIA
Exam Vouchers
Save money on CompTIA exams
| Question of the day
Sign up to receive
interactive practice questions
for MCSE, CompTIA
Cisco and other exams
| TestKing
Get MCSE, MCSD, CCNA, CCNP,A+, N+ and many more | * ExamSheets *
Guide for Success!
Actual Questions & Answers
MCSE, MCSD, A+ ,CCNA, CCNP
Oracle 8i, Oracle 9i Online practice tests
Certification sites Online university Online college Online education Distance learning Software forum Server administration forum Programming resources
|
|  |
| Author |
Exchange Server 2000 and Clustering
|
Guest
Registered: Not Yet Location: Country: State: Certifications: Working on:
Total Posts: N/A
|
|
Exchange Server 2000 and Clustering
Hello,
I have a customer whose requirements are as follows:
- Two isolated servers in the same domain running Windows
2000 Advanced Server.
- Each server is a different model/manufacturer with local
disk installed (ie no shared array or SAN)
- Each server has different roles eg printing on one, file
sharing on the other...
- Each server has a separate IP address and name...
They currently run Domino R5 on both systems - Domino is
clustered to replicate both ways.
This allows users to connect to either box and function
seamlessly. They connect to a pseudo name that uses DNS
round robin to determine the actual server they connect
to - this provides failover for the client.
The customer wants to migrate to Exchange 2000 Enterprise,
but is unsure if this will work in the scenario above.
They need to maintain separate physical systems and roles,
ONLY THE EXCHANGE COMPONENT will be clustered.
Is this possible?
Regards,
Tony.
Report this post to a moderator
|
|
11-29-02 05:23 AM
|
|
Mark Fugatt
Guest
Registered: Not Yet Location: Country: State: Certifications: Working on:
Total Posts: N/A
|
|
Re: Exchange Server 2000 and Clustering
They would need a shared disk array before they could cluster with W2K
Advanced Server and Exchange 2000
--
Mark Fugatt
Pentech Office Solutions Inc
www.4mcts.com
Visit www.msexchange.org for practical information on Microsoft Exchange
--- Please respond to this newsgroup and not directly via Email ---
<singularity44@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1e15b01c2976d$71922db0$8d
f82ecf@TK2MSFTNGXA02...
>
> Hello,
>
> I have a customer whose requirements are as follows:
>
> - Two isolated servers in the same domain running Windows
> 2000 Advanced Server.
> - Each server is a different model/manufacturer with local
> disk installed (ie no shared array or SAN)
> - Each server has different roles eg printing on one, file
> sharing on the other...
> - Each server has a separate IP address and name...
>
> They currently run Domino R5 on both systems - Domino is
> clustered to replicate both ways.
> This allows users to connect to either box and function
> seamlessly. They connect to a pseudo name that uses DNS
> round robin to determine the actual server they connect
> to - this provides failover for the client.
>
> The customer wants to migrate to Exchange 2000 Enterprise,
> but is unsure if this will work in the scenario above.
>
> They need to maintain separate physical systems and roles,
> ONLY THE EXCHANGE COMPONENT will be clustered.
>
> Is this possible?
>
> Regards,
>
> Tony.
>
Report this post to a moderator
|
|
11-29-02 06:23 AM
|
|
Niels
Guest
Registered: Not Yet Location: Country: State: Certifications: Working on:
Total Posts: N/A
|
|
Re: Exchange Server 2000 and Clustering
And, correct me if I am wrong, the hardware must be equal (the same)..
Niels
<singularity44@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1e15b01c2976d$71922db0$8d
f82ecf@TK2MSFTNGXA02...
>
> Hello,
>
> I have a customer whose requirements are as follows:
>
> - Two isolated servers in the same domain running Windows
> 2000 Advanced Server.
> - Each server is a different model/manufacturer with local
> disk installed (ie no shared array or SAN)
> - Each server has different roles eg printing on one, file
> sharing on the other...
> - Each server has a separate IP address and name...
>
> They currently run Domino R5 on both systems - Domino is
> clustered to replicate both ways.
> This allows users to connect to either box and function
> seamlessly. They connect to a pseudo name that uses DNS
> round robin to determine the actual server they connect
> to - this provides failover for the client.
>
> The customer wants to migrate to Exchange 2000 Enterprise,
> but is unsure if this will work in the scenario above.
>
> They need to maintain separate physical systems and roles,
> ONLY THE EXCHANGE COMPONENT will be clustered.
>
> Is this possible?
>
> Regards,
>
> Tony.
>
Report this post to a moderator
|
|
11-29-02 01:23 PM
|
|
|
Featured site: MCSE, MCSD, CompTIA, CCNA training videos
Forum Rules: Who Can Read The Forum? Any registered user or guest.
Who Can Post New Topics? Any registered user.
Who Can Post Replies? Any registered user.
Changes: Messages can be edited by their author.
Posts: HTML code is OFF. Smilies are ON. vB code is ON. [IMG] code is OFF. |
|
ExamNotes forum archive
|