ExamNotes.net  -  IT certification portal

ForumsCertResearchTop sitesNewslettersFree email
HomeRegister
Exams Notes
Practice exams
Exam games
Questions by email
Online training
Training videos
College degrees
Boot camps
Book store
Links directory
Tell a friend
For webmasters

CompTIA Exam Vouchers
Save money on CompTIA exams
Question of the day
Sign up to receive
interactive practice questions
for MCSE, CompTIA
Cisco and other exams
TestKing
Get MCSE, MCSD, CCNA, CCNP,A+, N+ and many more

* ExamSheets *
Guide for Success!
Actual Questions & Answers
MCSE, MCSD, A+ ,CCNA, CCNP
Oracle 8i, Oracle 9i

Online practice tests

Certification sites

Online university

Online college

Online education

Distance learning

Software forum

Server administration forum

Programming resources






This is interesting: Free IT Magazines | Databases help forum



Other IT certifications > Linux/Unix > Is MS for real?

Show a Printable Version
Email This Page to Someone!
Receive updates to this thread





Do you agree with this article?
Yes
No
No opinion either way
View Results [Edit Poll (moderators only)]

Pages (2): [1] 2 »

Author Is MS for real?
Yeti-GBR1
A Complete Twit




Registered: Oct 2000
Location: Yeti Town, Yetiville, UK
Country: UK
State:
Certifications: Too many to list.
Working on: Getting a real life outside IT.

Total Posts: 1105
Question

I found this whilst scavaging over Microsofts site:

http://www.microsoft.com/windows200...are/solaris.asp

is MS for real? do you beleive there argument?

Yeti

__________________
Yeti the Inquisitive

MCNE, MCSE(NT4), MCSE 2000, SCO ACE, LCP, Compaq ASE, CCNA, CCIE Wannabe (part of the Wannabe Boffin Club).

www.yeti-gbr1.co.uk
www.ciscolabs.co.uk

Report this post to a moderator

Old Post 02-26-01 06:15 PM
Yeti-GBR1 is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Yeti-GBR1 Click here to Send Yeti-GBR1 a Private Message Visit Yeti-GBR1's homepage! Add Yeti-GBR1 to your buddy list Find more posts by Yeti-GBR1    Yeti-GBR1's ICQ status    Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message IP: Logged

Guest




Registered: Not Yet
Location:
Country:
State:
Certifications:
Working on:

Total Posts: N/A

I thought using drugs druing working hpours was against M$ policy! Windows more reliable than UNIX? Could this article have come from anywhere else but Microsoft? I hear Nintendo was edging out Novell as well.

Report this post to a moderator

Old Post 02-26-01 06:36 PM
Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message IP: Logged
ccieToBe
Wireless Fanatic




Registered: Jul 2000
Location: Blue Ridge, North Georgia
Country: US
State:
Certifications: CCDA, CNA, MCP, Network+, A+, BSIT
Working on: Security+

Total Posts: 2210

Who would ever want to run Solaris on a multi-processor x86 system? Solaris is designed to be used on SPARCs, the Intel version is nice for learning the OS, but I'd never use it on a production server. If you want an x86 Unix server, FreeBSD is a much better choice.

How could they even mention reliabilty? Look out how often MSN has been down since they switched from FreeBSD to Win2k.

I could go on and on, but I think most (if not all) of those who frequent this forum realize how ridiculous this article is.

Report this post to a moderator

Old Post 02-26-01 10:18 PM
ccieToBe is offline Click Here to See the Profile for ccieToBe Click here to Send ccieToBe a Private Message Visit ccieToBe's homepage! Add ccieToBe to your buddy list Find more posts by ccieToBe Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message IP: Logged
neuralfx
Senior Member




Registered: Jul 2001
Location:
Country: Cook Islands
State:
Certifications: CIW-A, A+, Net+, Inet+, Server+, Linux+, MCSE, MCSA, Sair LCP
Working on: CCNA, MCSE 03, CWNA

Total Posts: 377

ya know, i read it a couple times, and its like whoever started writing it, got tired and walked away .. they didnt really say anything, i mean at all, they didnt really have an argument .. hm weird, anyway, there's a short paper Neal Stephenson wrote i think you all should check it, can be found here ..

Hole Hawg UNIX

-neural

Report this post to a moderator

Old Post 11-07-01 07:24 PM
neuralfx is offline Click Here to See the Profile for neuralfx Click here to Send neuralfx a Private Message Add neuralfx to your buddy list Find more posts by neuralfx Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message IP: Logged
ccieToBe
Wireless Fanatic




Registered: Jul 2000
Location: Blue Ridge, North Georgia
Country: US
State:
Certifications: CCDA, CNA, MCP, Network+, A+, BSIT
Working on: Security+

Total Posts: 2210

quote:
Originally posted by neuralfx
ya know, i read it a couple times, and its like whoever started writing it, got tired and walked away .. they didnt really say anything, i mean at all, they didnt really have an argument .. hm weird, anyway, there's a short paper Neal Stephenson wrote i think you all should check it, can be found here ..

Hole Hawg UNIX

-neural



That's a great analogy.

Report this post to a moderator

Old Post 11-07-01 11:57 PM
ccieToBe is offline Click Here to See the Profile for ccieToBe Click here to Send ccieToBe a Private Message Visit ccieToBe's homepage! Add ccieToBe to your buddy list Find more posts by ccieToBe Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message IP: Logged
rlrouns
Member




Registered: Aug 2000
Location: Coral Springs
Country: US
State:
Certifications: SANS GSEC, IBM Server Expert, CCNA, SANS Win2k Gold Standard, MCSE, Linux+, Security+
Working on: GCWN, CISSP

Total Posts: 235

I dont think that MS can compare with Solaris. They should be doing a comparison with Linux, and answering questions like, How come we can only cluster 2 servers together, when with Linux, a university clustered 72 IBM Intel based servers together as one resource using free software? In a production server enviornment, I would rather spend my cash on hardware than an OS any day....

Roberto

Report this post to a moderator

Old Post 11-13-01 01:51 AM
rlrouns is offline Click Here to See the Profile for rlrouns Click here to Send rlrouns a Private Message Add rlrouns to your buddy list Find more posts by rlrouns Send a message to rlrouns Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message IP: Logged
Kasor
Senior Member
M




Registered: Jul 2000
Location: Yankee
Country: USA
State:
Certifications: n^2
Working on: STUDYING!!!

Total Posts: 3159

Not!!!

__________________
Kill All Suffer 2 Reborn

Report this post to a moderator

Old Post 12-03-01 01:35 AM
Kasor is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Kasor Click here to Send Kasor a Private Message Add Kasor to your buddy list Find more posts by Kasor Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message IP: Logged
Warfare
Cyber Warrior
M




Registered: Oct 2001
Location: London
Country: United Kingdom
State:
Certifications: Network+, college degree
Working on: CCNA, BSc Computer Networks & Communications

Total Posts: 514

I didnt bother reading the M$ article.
Their articles give me the creeps. I rely on third-party benchmarks that dont have any relations with M$ in any way (like bribes!).

MS site always convinces you their products always wins and its perfect without any cons. Thats not realistic.


The funny thing is even of MS tries to do a benchmark they pick the worst enviroments and conditions for the competing product with default configurations. Like solaris on x68, and the best enviroment with optimized configurations for their products with increased boosted feutures.


uhhh, I see there are 3 peeps who actually got brainwashed by the MS article

__________________
Warfare Systems
Better Die Standing Than To Live Upon Your Knees

Report this post to a moderator

Old Post 12-13-01 05:49 AM
Warfare is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Warfare Click here to Send Warfare a Private Message Add Warfare to your buddy list Find more posts by Warfare Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message IP: Logged
bam40
Junior Member
M




Registered: Dec 2001
Location: VA
Country: United States
State:
Certifications: MCSE, CIW-P , A+, Net+
Working on: CWNA

Total Posts: 21
AOL/Redhad

Hi all,

I read in the 1/19/02 Washington Post Business section that AOL Time Warner are in "fluid" neogations with Redhat. It seems like the compettons might heat up for MS.







www.pilotit.org:)

__________________
Bam

Report this post to a moderator

Old Post 01-20-02 03:22 PM
bam40 is offline Click Here to See the Profile for bam40 Click here to Send bam40 a Private Message Visit bam40's homepage! Add bam40 to your buddy list Find more posts by bam40 Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message IP: Logged
ccieToBe
Wireless Fanatic




Registered: Jul 2000
Location: Blue Ridge, North Georgia
Country: US
State:
Certifications: CCDA, CNA, MCP, Network+, A+, BSIT
Working on: Security+

Total Posts: 2210
Re: AOL/Redhad

quote:
Originally posted by bam40
Hi all,

I read in the 1/19/02 Washington Post Business section that AOL Time Warner are in "fluid" neogations with Redhat. It seems like the compettons might heat up for MS.







www.pilotit.org:)



Yeah, slashdot had a story on it too. I really hope this doesn't go through. RedHat's doing a great job of marketing Linux and I have a feeling that if AOL bought RedHat it would stagnate just like Netscape did after AOL's purchase.

Report this post to a moderator

Old Post 01-20-02 03:49 PM
ccieToBe is offline Click Here to See the Profile for ccieToBe Click here to Send ccieToBe a Private Message Visit ccieToBe's homepage! Add ccieToBe to your buddy list Find more posts by ccieToBe Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message IP: Logged
All times are GMT.
Pages (2): [1] 2 » Post new thread   Post reply

Featured site: MCSE, MCSD, CompTIA, CCNA training videos



Forum Jump:
Rate This Thread:
Forum Rules:
Who Can Read The Forum? Any registered user or guest.
Who Can Post New Topics? Any registered user.
Who Can Post Replies? Any registered user.
Changes: Messages can be edited by their author.
Posts: HTML code is OFF. Smilies are ON. vB code is ON. [IMG] code is ON.
 

ExamNotes forum archive


Powered by: vBulletin 2.2.8
Copyright ©2000, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.

  Free Braindumps | mcse braindumps