This'll be the last post from me on this thread. It
seems to have gotten as low as it'll go. I replied in a
long-winded way early on, and I received some good
feedback from you and from Galileo, then all the silly
people got involved. Laura, just ignore the stuff
from "John" <me@moyb.com>, it's from someone who doesn't
realise the effect of using a name that's already in use
throughout the post.

Later.

Report this post to a moderator

circa Thu, 27 Mar 2003 01:09:49 -0800, in
microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse, John
(i_should_have_used_an_unique_
name@instead_of._John) said,
> This'll be the last post from me on this thread. It
> seems to have gotten as low as it'll go. I replied in a
> long-winded way early on, and I received some good
> feedback from you and from Galileo, then all the silly
> people got involved. Laura, just ignore the stuff
> from "John" <me@moyb.com>, it's from someone who doesn't
> realise the effect of using a name that's already in use
> throughout the post.
>
>
Ah, are you a different John? I should pay more attention to headers.
Apologies if I ripped into you.

Laura
--
Any condescension detected in this post is fully unintentional and is
solely the perception of the reader. If I think you're an idiot, I'll
tell you that. You won't need to intuit it.

Report this post to a moderator

nope its the real me sweetheart. toying with you. I know you like it.


"Laura A. Robinson" < firstinitiallastname@technolog
ist.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.18ed4c63c9cf47ac98a480@msnews.microsoft.com...
> circa Thu, 27 Mar 2003 01:09:49 -0800, in
> microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse, John
> (i_should_have_used_an_unique_
name@instead_of._John) said,
> > This'll be the last post from me on this thread. It
> > seems to have gotten as low as it'll go. I replied in a
> > long-winded way early on, and I received some good
> > feedback from you and from Galileo, then all the silly
> > people got involved. Laura, just ignore the stuff
> > from "John" <me@moyb.com>, it's from someone who doesn't
> > realise the effect of using a name that's already in use
> > throughout the post.
> >
> >
> Ah, are you a different John? I should pay more attention to headers.
> Apologies if I ripped into you.
>
> Laura
> --
> Any condescension detected in this post is fully unintentional and is
> solely the perception of the reader. If I think you're an idiot, I'll
> tell you that. You won't need to intuit it.

Report this post to a moderator

i'm sorry mate but that just smacks of crap..
maybe i'm old fashioned but i dont like women being messed with too much..
sorry laura if you are offended by that , but ah well

"John" <none@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:O8WK4cL9CHA.1776@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> nope its the real me sweetheart. toying with you. I know you like it.
>
>
> "Laura A. Robinson" < firstinitiallastname@technolog
ist.com> wrote in
message
> news:MPG.18ed4c63c9cf47ac98a480@msnews.microsoft.com...
> > circa Thu, 27 Mar 2003 01:09:49 -0800, in
> > microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse, John
> > (i_should_have_used_an_unique_
name@instead_of._John) said,
> > > This'll be the last post from me on this thread. It
> > > seems to have gotten as low as it'll go. I replied in a
> > > long-winded way early on, and I received some good
> > > feedback from you and from Galileo, then all the silly
> > > people got involved. Laura, just ignore the stuff
> > > from "John" <me@moyb.com>, it's from someone who doesn't
> > > realise the effect of using a name that's already in use
> > > throughout the post.
> > >
> > >
> > Ah, are you a different John? I should pay more attention to headers.
> > Apologies if I ripped into you.
> >
> > Laura
> > --
> > Any condescension detected in this post is fully unintentional and is
> > solely the perception of the reader. If I think you're an idiot, I'll
> > tell you that. You won't need to intuit it.
>
>

Report this post to a moderator