|
Home > Archive > alt.certification.mcse > January 2004 > allt..certkiller.com got new exam updated compared to testking.co.uk
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
allt..certkiller.com got new exam updated compared to testking.co.uk
|
|
|
| allt..certkiller.com got new exam updated compared to testking.co.uk
this site is very good for all IT certifications.Material is real and
cheap than others.
| |
| Old Enough to Know Better 2004-01-04, 1:25 am |
|
"camry" <camry_don@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:591b41ed.0401030041.68fab554@posting.google.com...
> allt..certkiller.com got new exam updated compared to testking.co.uk
>
> this site is very good for all IT certifications.Material is real and
> cheap than others.
Such mastery of the written word !
| |
| =?Windows-1252?Q?Frisbee=AE_MCNGP?= 2004-01-05, 2:26 pm |
| Old Enough to Know Better wrote:
> "camry" <camry_don@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:591b41ed.0401030041.68fab554@posting.google.com...
>
> Such mastery of the written word !
He's the newest of the cobol, wongh, and camol brothers. He is certainly
more verbal.
--
Fris "Dewey, Screwum, & Howe" bee® MCNGP #13
http://www.mcngp.tk
The MCNGP Team - We're here to help
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/certaholics
Certaholics - We're here if you're beyond help
| |
| somegit 2004-01-06, 12:26 pm |
| On Mon, 5 Jan 2004 13:41:13 -0500, Frisbee® MCNGP
<oncebitten@twiceshy.com> wrote:
>Old Enough to Know Better wrote:
>
>He's the newest of the cobol, wongh, and camol brothers. He is certainly
>more verbal.
I swatted like mad 70-210, tried to understand everything I was
learning and then used testkings questions to prepare for the exam.
Took it yesterday and passed. Wasn't too hard, what suprised me is the
amount of testkings questions that did actually come up in the exam.
Mr Caveman
| |
| Ken Briscoe 2004-01-06, 1:26 pm |
| > I swatted like mad 70-210, tried to understand everything I was
> learning and then used testkings questions to prepare for the exam.
> Took it yesterday and passed. Wasn't too hard, what suprised me is the
> amount of testkings questions that did actually come up in the exam.
>
You should be "swatted like mad". Cheating dumper. Why would it surprise
you that the testking questions come up on the test? They *are* the test
questions, XXX clown. Don't use dumps anymore, you're ruining the
certification for the rest of us.
--
KB
first inital last name AT hotmail DOT com
| |
| TolkienRing 2004-01-06, 3:27 pm |
| What's an XXX clown? And what's up with all the cross-posting?
I looked at a Kaazaa'd Troytech for the first time today...at least 20% of
the answers were flat wrong anyway - and those are the ones I could identify
immediately.
What is the 'braindump guilt' thing? As crappy and ambiguous as Microsoft's
questions are, it only slightly evens the playing field. Besides, anyone who
goes to the effort to cull through the crap, and pay for the M$
certification tests is obviously serious about networking. Experience is
what is shown on a resume, knowledge and willingness to learn is what
certifications are for.
It's amazing how many people who slam braindumps seem to know all about
them...
"Ken Briscoe" <youcant@sendmespam.com> wrote in message
news:bteqlq$6clqb$1@ID-197826.news.uni-berlin.de...
>
> You should be "swatted like mad". Cheating dumper. Why would it surprise
> you that the testking questions come up on the test? They *are* the test
> questions, XXX clown. Don't use dumps anymore, you're ruining the
> certification for the rest of us.
>
> --
>
> KB
>
> first inital last name AT hotmail DOT com
>
>
| |
| Marlin (the PFY) Munrow 2004-01-06, 5:32 pm |
| On Tue, 6 Jan 2004 14:26:53 -0500, "TolkienRing"
<sorry@toomuchspam.justaskme.com> wrote:
>What's an XXX clown? And what's up with all the cross-posting?
>
>I looked at a Kaazaa'd Troytech for the first time today...at least 20% of
>the answers were flat wrong anyway - and those are the ones I could identify
>immediately.
>
>What is the 'braindump guilt' thing? As crappy and ambiguous as Microsoft's
>questions are, it only slightly evens the playing field. Besides, anyone who
>goes to the effort to cull through the crap, and pay for the M$
>certification tests is obviously serious about networking. Experience is
>what is shown on a resume, knowledge and willingness to learn is what
>certifications are for.
>
>It's amazing how many people who slam braindumps seem to know all about
>them...
>
>
>"Ken Briscoe" <youcant@sendmespam.com> wrote in message
>news:bteqlq$6clqb$1@ID-197826.news.uni-berlin.de...
>
Have to agree.
I've seen these types of dumps a couple of years back. It seems
immoral that they charge for rubbish. It has been a while but my
recollection was that more than 30% of the answers I saw were outright
wrong.
I thought that the reason Microsoft left these people running was that
they generated re-take revenue at the testing centers!
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++
"We require rigidly defined areas of
doubt and uncertainty!"
Remove Vroomfondle to email me.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++
| |
| somegit 2004-01-08, 3:27 am |
| On Tue, 6 Jan 2004 12:18:48 -0500, "Ken Briscoe"
<youcant@sendmespam.com> wrote:
>You should be "swatted like mad". Cheating dumper. Why would it surprise
>you that the testking questions come up on the test? They *are* the test
>questions, XXX clown. Don't use dumps anymore, you're ruining the
>certification for the rest of us.
You don't even know why your last comment to me made you look such a
pratt do you!!
I've worked in IT ALL MY WORKING LIFE and at 35 I should reckon I know
what I am doing on a computer. I can also tell a bad engineer from a
good engineer and most of the bad ones I have worked with in the past
were MCP or MCSE qualified. The only reason I am taking these shitty
microshyte exams is in the UK you cannot get a reasonably paid job now
without them. Which makes no sense at all. I'd rather work with
someone who has experience rather than certifications. It's just the
shiny bummed pen pushers that seem to think they matter. The last
network admin I worked with was useless, he'd never done a testking
revision session in his life, he actually took he's mcse's at
college/university. The point I am trying to make is he was crap at
his job whether he used testking type tests or not! Also if they are
so bad for the industry how comes my class lecturer recommended the
testking papers?
To end my rant about useless wankers (such as yourself) who would
rather talk crap and be abusive than in the least bit helpful, why
don't you keep your half baked comments to yourself unless you have
anything worth being heard! testking rocks! but there is nothing that
equals to good old fashioned hands on experience.
somegit
| |
| HouseVod 2004-01-08, 10:26 am |
| Here here. I have also been in the trade for 15 years, I am seeking
certifications to prove I know what I know as my experience doesnt seem to
count with those 'shiny bummed pen pushers', they dont even seem to
interview you unless you got pretty certificates! So time to update and and
add. I would prefer to work along side a team with oodles of experience and
no certs, than a bunch of uni leavers with a lot of theory but no 'real
world' experience. I know what I know and if you ask me in an interview I
will tell you, if others lie saying they know it inside out cos they have
the cert, that is their princinples at question and the interviewers problem
for not checking or asking some 'theoretical problem/fix situations' to test
their knowledge.
That is also the end of my rant, back to my CCNA book now!
--
House
MCP, MCP+I, MCSE, A+, Network +
Dont e-mail me, I dont exist!
"somegit" <someone@somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:ei1qvvcan6qea7dsrrlq4j3uv
ol2r9hpu7@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 6 Jan 2004 12:18:48 -0500, "Ken Briscoe"
> <youcant@sendmespam.com> wrote:
>
>
> You don't even know why your last comment to me made you look such a
> pratt do you!!
>
> I've worked in IT ALL MY WORKING LIFE and at 35 I should reckon I know
> what I am doing on a computer. I can also tell a bad engineer from a
> good engineer and most of the bad ones I have worked with in the past
> were MCP or MCSE qualified. The only reason I am taking these shitty
> microshyte exams is in the UK you cannot get a reasonably paid job now
> without them. Which makes no sense at all. I'd rather work with
> someone who has experience rather than certifications. It's just the
> shiny bummed pen pushers that seem to think they matter. The last
> network admin I worked with was useless, he'd never done a testking
> revision session in his life, he actually took he's mcse's at
> college/university. The point I am trying to make is he was crap at
> his job whether he used testking type tests or not! Also if they are
> so bad for the industry how comes my class lecturer recommended the
> testking papers?
>
> To end my rant about useless wankers (such as yourself) who would
> rather talk crap and be abusive than in the least bit helpful, why
> don't you keep your half baked comments to yourself unless you have
> anything worth being heard! testking rocks! but there is nothing that
> equals to good old fashioned hands on experience.
>
> somegit
| |
| Dominik Sturlan 2004-01-11, 8:26 am |
| Iam interested you said that they wont even interview you if you dont have
some kind of cert. So do you need to have a deegree and cert. to get
interviewd or is it experience and cert. enough???
| |
| HouseVod 2004-01-12, 12:26 pm |
| I can only speak from experience. I have an MCSE in NT4, 15 years experience
and nothing from Uni and live in the South West UK (very slow for IT jobs).
I applied for abot 10 jobs and didnt hear back from any of them, I took the
first job I was offered (agency £7 p/h) and was still not even getting
replies.
The last place I applied for I had a friend on the selection board so asked
for it straight so to speak.
He said most of the other applicants that got an interview had MCSE in 2k
and some had other stuff like Novel and Cisco, and experience, I was pipped
to the post by more up do date quals.
Since this (August '03) I 'took the bull by the horns' and decided to go
update to MSCE 2k3 and gaining MCDBA, MCSE:Security, A+, Network +, Security
+ and CCNA in recognition of what I know.
Since then I have passed Network+, both the A+ (2003 track) and MCP XP, I
have tried Security + but failed (by 2 questions). I am reading the book for
Cisco hoping to take it Feb, and retake Security later this month.
I am not even applying for jobs until I get some of these under my belt but
have a dead line for myself to go after more money mid '04. I think it was
my out of date quals and lots of said experience but nothing to prove it. I
hope this helps, good luck.
--
House
MCP, MCP+I, MCSE, A+, Network +
Dont e-mail me, I dont exist!
"Dominik Sturlan" <dominik@email.hinet.hr> wrote in message
news:btrh6n$fb6$1@bagan.srce.hr...
> Iam interested you said that they wont even interview you if you dont have
> some kind of cert. So do you need to have a deegree and cert. to get
> interviewd or is it experience and cert. enough???
>
>
| |
| liyaqat_naz 2004-01-18, 12:10 pm |
| yes it is | |
|
|
| =?Windows-1252?Q?Frisbee=AE_MCNGP?= 2004-01-24, 1:25 pm |
| wongh wrote:
> updates??
Why oh WHY isn't anyone answering this man?!
I thought this was a newsgroup full of helpful people. Sheesh.
--
Fris "I feel your pain" bee® MCNGP #13
http://www.mcngp.tk
The MCNGP Team - We're here to help - BUT WE CAN'T DO IT ALONE!
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/certaholics
Certaholics - We're here if you're beyond help
|
|
|
|
|