|
Home > Archive > alt.certification.mcse > March 2003 > Microsoft Cluster and Novell 6 Cluster
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Microsoft Cluster and Novell 6 Cluster
|
|
| Tri 4 Certs 2003-03-21, 10:24 pm |
| I want to convince my company to go for Microsoft Cluster instead of Novell
Cluster. Where can I find the information on Microsoft or both product
comparision? How reliable of MS Cluster?
| |
| Freeride 2003-03-22, 11:24 pm |
| On Sat, 22 Mar 2003 03:54:26 +0000, Tri 4 Certs wrote:
> I want to convince my company to go for Microsoft Cluster instead of Novell
> Cluster. Where can I find the information on Microsoft or both product
> comparision? How reliable of MS Cluster?
A cluster for what??? File and print sharing? Only thing that I can assume
you are talking about since Netware does not support to many applications.
My point of view have setup both and history with both Novell and M$.
Novell hands down is 10 time better OS for file and print. Novell's NSS3
file system smokes NTFS. Active Directory compared to NDS is a joke. Ease
of management on NDS vs AD and Novell file system compared to M$ NTFS is
no comparison, you can manage Novell with half the people and would have
to buy shit loads of third party add-ons for Win2k to get the same
functionality.
| |
| pheonix1t 2003-03-24, 12:24 am |
| Freeride wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Mar 2003 03:54:26 +0000, Tri 4 Certs wrote:
>
>
>>I want to convince my company to go for Microsoft Cluster instead of Novell
>>Cluster. Where can I find the information on Microsoft or both product
>>comparision? How reliable of MS Cluster?
>
>
>
> A cluster for what??? File and print sharing? Only thing that I can assume
> you are talking about since Netware does not support to many applications.
> My point of view have setup both and history with both Novell and M$.
> Novell hands down is 10 time better OS for file and print. Novell's NSS3
> file system smokes NTFS. Active Directory compared to NDS is a joke. Ease
> of management on NDS vs AD and Novell file system compared to M$ NTFS is
> no comparison, you can manage Novell with half the people and would have
> to buy shit loads of third party add-ons for Win2k to get the same
> functionality.
wow......finally an enlightened person speaks the truth!!
I've known this about Novell for years....MS is a wanna-be that has made
a science out of ripping off novell and a string of other companies,
then they repackage their "new" hacked product as "innovative"!! LOL
another product that smokes windows NT and 2K for file/print sharing is
samba on unix/linux. The harder you push unix/linux, the more efficient
it becomes....the harder you push windows, the less efficient it becomes.
|
|
|
|
|