|
Home > Archive > alt.certification.mcse > October 2003 > Two 70-210 Qs
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
|
|
| Fuse News 2003-10-20, 1:26 pm |
| I'm studying for 70-210 and I've noticed some contradicting material in my
study program.
Issue1: One Q gives a "correct" answer of booting to the Recovery Console
and disabling the DRIVER with the Disable command while another Q's
explanation states that you CANNOT disable DRIVERS from the Recovery
Console, only SERVICES. My question: Can you disable DRIVERS from the RC (I
know you can disable Services).
Issue2: In setting up ICS, I know that when you enable the On-Demand, your
PC becomes the DHCP "server" and you lose connectivity to the network. I
have 2 Qs on this and one "correct" answer says to disable ICS to regain
connectivity to the network, while the other "correct" answer says to run
IPCONFIG /release and /renew on all of the clients to pick up their IP from
the new DHCP (ICS) "server". Aren't both methods correct, depending on
whether or not you want the network to maintain internet connectivity? When
presented with both options, what makes one more correct than the other?
Thx
| |
| Andy Foster 2003-10-20, 2:28 pm |
| On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 12:56:08 -0400, Fuse News wrote:
> I'm studying for 70-210 and I've noticed some contradicting material in my
> study program.
>
> Issue1: One Q gives a "correct" answer of booting to the Recovery Console
> and disabling the DRIVER with the Disable command while another Q's
> explanation states that you CANNOT disable DRIVERS from the Recovery
> Console, only SERVICES. My question: Can you disable DRIVERS from the RC
> (I know you can disable Services).
Try it for yourself, it's the best way to learn.
>
> Issue2: In setting up ICS, I know that when you enable the On-Demand, your
> PC becomes the DHCP "server" and you lose connectivity to the network. I
> have 2 Qs on this and one "correct" answer says to disable ICS to regain
> connectivity to the network, while the other "correct" answer says to run
> IPCONFIG /release and /renew on all of the clients to pick up their IP
> from the new DHCP (ICS) "server". Aren't both methods correct, depending
> on whether or not you want the network to maintain internet connectivity?
> When presented with both options, what makes one more correct than the
> other?
Do you understand what happens when you enable ICS ? Do you know why you
*might* lose network connectivity ?
By default, the ICS PC uses the IP addy 192.168.0.1/24 for the internal
NIC. If the rest of your network is using a different address space, they
won't be able to communicate. If your clients can only communicate when
ICS is disabled, ICS won't be much use to you, will it ?????
HTH
Andy
| |
| Fuse News 2003-10-22, 10:27 am |
|
"Andy Foster" <Firtsname@FirstnameLastname.com> wrote in message
news an.2003.10.20.18.23.43.489490@FirstnameLastname.com...
> On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 12:56:08 -0400, Fuse News wrote:
>
> > I'm studying for 70-210 and I've noticed some contradicting material in
my
> > study program.
> >
> > Issue1: One Q gives a "correct" answer of booting to the Recovery
Console
> > and disabling the DRIVER with the Disable command while another Q's
> > explanation states that you CANNOT disable DRIVERS from the Recovery
> > Console, only SERVICES. My question: Can you disable DRIVERS from the
RC
> > (I know you can disable Services).
>
> Try it for yourself, it's the best way to learn.
>
> >
> > Issue2: In setting up ICS, I know that when you enable the On-Demand,
your
> > PC becomes the DHCP "server" and you lose connectivity to the network.
I
> > have 2 Qs on this and one "correct" answer says to disable ICS to regain
> > connectivity to the network, while the other "correct" answer says to
run
> > IPCONFIG /release and /renew on all of the clients to pick up their IP
> > from the new DHCP (ICS) "server". Aren't both methods correct,
depending
> > on whether or not you want the network to maintain internet
connectivity?
> > When presented with both options, what makes one more correct than the
> > other?
>
> Do you understand what happens when you enable ICS ? Do you know why you
> *might* lose network connectivity ?
> By default, the ICS PC uses the IP addy 192.168.0.1/24 for the internal
> NIC. If the rest of your network is using a different address space, they
> won't be able to communicate. If your clients can only communicate when
> ICS is disabled, ICS won't be much use to you, will it ?????
>
> HTH
>
> Andy
Well thanks, Andy but that doesn't really answer my question. Yes I
understand how ICS works and yes I understand the difference between
regaining connectivity by disabling ICS vs. forcing clients to get IP
settings from the ICS PC. My question was why one option would be MORE
correct than the other if I were presented with both options. In 2 similiar
scenarios, one gives a correct answer of forcing an IP renewal on the
clients (the one that makes sense) and the other says the correct answer is
to disable ICS. In it's explanation it states that this is the only way to
regain connectivity. Is there a reason disabling ICS would be the correct
option or is this just a bogus question?
|
|
|
|
|