|
Home > Archive > alt.certification.mcse > September 2002 > differenced between 70-210 and 70--215
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
differenced between 70-210 and 70--215
|
|
|
| Good afternoon folks,
Im going to start the MCSA next week.
What are the differences between 70-210 install, etc 2k pro, and 70-215
install configure, etc, 2k server.
I understand that they are 2 different OS but they are so similar, how
different can the exams be?
AS
| |
| WhiteIkon 2002-09-23, 8:29 am |
| 70-215 Covers more of the Server Services, IE DHCP, DNS, etc... this is also
covered in more depth in the 70-216 exam and then active directory with
GPO's in the 70-217 Exam.
I found that the 70-210 exam was more of end user problems ie, changing
resolution and things of that nature, where as the 70-215 exam had a lot to
do with RAS, DNS, and DHCP.
"AS" <astaubin@videotron.ca> wrote in message
news:QlEj9.22399$32.414371@weber.videotron.net...
> Good afternoon folks,
>
> Im going to start the MCSA next week.
>
> What are the differences between 70-210 install, etc 2k pro, and 70-215
> install configure, etc, 2k server.
>
> I understand that they are 2 different OS but they are so similar, how
> different can the exams be?
>
>
> AS
>
>
>
| |
| WhiteIkon 2002-09-23, 9:29 am |
| 70-215 Covers more of the Server Services, IE DHCP, DNS, etc... this is also
covered in more depth in the 70-216 exam and then active directory with
GPO's in the 70-217 Exam.
I found that the 70-210 exam was more of end user problems ie, changing
resolution and things of that nature, where as the 70-215 exam had a lot to
do with RAS, DNS, and DHCP.
"AS" <astaubin@videotron.ca> wrote in message
news:QlEj9.22399$32.414371@weber.videotron.net...
> Good afternoon folks,
>
> Im going to start the MCSA next week.
>
> What are the differences between 70-210 install, etc 2k pro, and 70-215
> install configure, etc, 2k server.
>
> I understand that they are 2 different OS but they are so similar, how
> different can the exams be?
>
>
> AS
>
>
>
| |
| Jon Bischke 2002-09-23, 9:29 am |
| Quite a bit different. Familiarize yourself with the information you'll
need to know for each exam by going to http://www.microsoft.com/traincert
and looking at the objectives for each exam. I think you'll see some pretty
significant differences.
--
Jon Bischke, CertTutor.net
Save Time and Money While Getting Certified!
Pick up "The Insider's Guide to IT Certification"
http://winnet.bookaisle.com/ebookco...p?eBookID=13475
"AS" <astaubin@videotron.ca> wrote in message
news:QlEj9.22399$32.414371@weber.videotron.net...
> Good afternoon folks,
>
> Im going to start the MCSA next week.
>
> What are the differences between 70-210 install, etc 2k pro, and 70-215
> install configure, etc, 2k server.
>
> I understand that they are 2 different OS but they are so similar, how
> different can the exams be?
>
>
> AS
>
>
>
| |
| Jon Bischke 2002-09-23, 10:29 am |
| Quite a bit different. Familiarize yourself with the information you'll
need to know for each exam by going to http://www.microsoft.com/traincert
and looking at the objectives for each exam. I think you'll see some pretty
significant differences.
--
Jon Bischke, CertTutor.net
Save Time and Money While Getting Certified!
Pick up "The Insider's Guide to IT Certification"
http://winnet.bookaisle.com/ebookco...p?eBookID=13475
"AS" <astaubin@videotron.ca> wrote in message
news:QlEj9.22399$32.414371@weber.videotron.net...
> Good afternoon folks,
>
> Im going to start the MCSA next week.
>
> What are the differences between 70-210 install, etc 2k pro, and 70-215
> install configure, etc, 2k server.
>
> I understand that they are 2 different OS but they are so similar, how
> different can the exams be?
>
>
> AS
>
>
>
| |
| Philip Black 2002-09-24, 12:29 pm |
| Your too stupid to take the XXXXing exam !!!
Give up while your ahead , if you dont even know the majour differences
between a workstation and a server.
"AS" <astaubin@videotron.ca> wrote in message
news:QlEj9.22399$32.414371@weber.videotron.net...
> Good afternoon folks,
>
> Im going to start the MCSA next week.
>
> What are the differences between 70-210 install, etc 2k pro, and 70-215
> install configure, etc, 2k server.
>
> I understand that they are 2 different OS but they are so similar, how
> different can the exams be?
>
>
> AS
>
>
>
| |
| Philip Black 2002-09-24, 1:29 pm |
| Your too stupid to take the XXXXing exam !!!
Give up while your ahead , if you dont even know the majour differences
between a workstation and a server.
"AS" <astaubin@videotron.ca> wrote in message
news:QlEj9.22399$32.414371@weber.videotron.net...
> Good afternoon folks,
>
> Im going to start the MCSA next week.
>
> What are the differences between 70-210 install, etc 2k pro, and 70-215
> install configure, etc, 2k server.
>
> I understand that they are 2 different OS but they are so similar, how
> different can the exams be?
>
>
> AS
>
>
>
| |
| MCSEwannabe 2002-09-24, 1:29 pm |
| "Philip Black" <philip_black@hotpop.com> wrote:
> Your too stupid to take the XXXXing exam !!!
> Give up while your ahead , if you dont even know the majour differences
> between a workstation and a server.
Ah, Philip, you're always such a ray of sunshine when you visit this
group!
It's a legit question, as there is a great deal of overlap, especially
in install procedures, even if the focus of the exam is server, not
desktop functions.
> "AS" <astaubin@videotron.ca> wrote in message
> news:QlEj9.22399$32.414371@weber.videotron.net...
>> Good afternoon folks,
>>
>> Im going to start the MCSA next week.
>>
>> What are the differences between 70-210 install, etc 2k pro, and 70-
215
>> install configure, etc, 2k server.
>>
>> I understand that they are 2 different OS but they are so similar, how
>> different can the exams be?
| |
|
| On Tue, 24 Sep 2002 13:48:35 -0400, "Philip Black"
<philip_black@hotpop.com> wrote:
>Your too stupid to take the XXXXing exam !!!
>Give up while your ahead , if you dont even know the majour differences
At least he can spell
| |
| MCSEwannabe 2002-09-24, 2:29 pm |
| "Philip Black" <philip_black@hotpop.com> wrote:
> Your too stupid to take the XXXXing exam !!!
> Give up while your ahead , if you dont even know the majour differences
> between a workstation and a server.
Ah, Philip, you're always such a ray of sunshine when you visit this
group!
It's a legit question, as there is a great deal of overlap, especially
in install procedures, even if the focus of the exam is server, not
desktop functions.
> "AS" <astaubin@videotron.ca> wrote in message
> news:QlEj9.22399$32.414371@weber.videotron.net...
>> Good afternoon folks,
>>
>> Im going to start the MCSA next week.
>>
>> What are the differences between 70-210 install, etc 2k pro, and 70-
215
>> install configure, etc, 2k server.
>>
>> I understand that they are 2 different OS but they are so similar, how
>> different can the exams be?
| |
|
| On Tue, 24 Sep 2002 13:48:35 -0400, "Philip Black"
<philip_black@hotpop.com> wrote:
>Your too stupid to take the XXXXing exam !!!
>Give up while your ahead , if you dont even know the majour differences
At least he can spell
| |
|
| too stupid to take the exam?
I don't think so chap.
the exams are installing, configuring and maintaining win2k pro and win2k
server.
the installation process is virtually identical
most of the services are similar
both os have mostly the same utilities.
since both os have so many similarities, I was wondering how different the
exams were.
ps - your a jack XXX-
if you can't help, then DONT.
"Philip Black" <philip_black@hotpop.com> wrote in message
news:Wy1k9.557$Vy3.8182@newscontent-01.sprint.ca...
> Your too stupid to take the XXXXing exam !!!
> Give up while your ahead , if you dont even know the majour differences
> between a workstation and a server.
> "AS" <astaubin@videotron.ca> wrote in message
> news:QlEj9.22399$32.414371@weber.videotron.net...
> > Good afternoon folks,
> >
> > Im going to start the MCSA next week.
> >
> > What are the differences between 70-210 install, etc 2k pro, and 70-215
> > install configure, etc, 2k server.
> >
> > I understand that they are 2 different OS but they are so similar, how
> > different can the exams be?
> >
> >
> > AS
> >
> >
> >
>
>
| |
|
| thats exactly what I meant.
thanks.
> Ah, Philip, you're always such a ray of sunshine when you visit this
> group!
>
> It's a legit question, as there is a great deal of overlap, especially
> in install procedures, even if the focus of the exam is server, not
> desktop functions.
>
>
> > "AS" <astaubin@videotron.ca> wrote in message
> > news:QlEj9.22399$32.414371@weber.videotron.net...
> >> Good afternoon folks,
> >>
> >> Im going to start the MCSA next week.
> >>
> >> What are the differences between 70-210 install, etc 2k pro, and 70-
> 215
> >> install configure, etc, 2k server.
> >>
> >> I understand that they are 2 different OS but they are so similar, how
> >> different can the exams be?
| |
| Jeffrey L. Woods 2002-09-24, 5:29 pm |
| In article <rW5k9.12566$aQ2.330229@weber.videotron.net>,
astaubin@videotron.ca says...
> too stupid to take the exam?
> I don't think so chap.
There's a vast difference between stupid and ignorant. You're likely
smart enough to learn what you need to know, and hopefully smart enough
to realize what you don't know.
> the exams are installing, configuring and maintaining win2k pro and win2k
> server.
>
> the installation process is virtually identical
> most of the services are similar
Nope. Most of the services are NOT similar. Running W2K Server
includes maintaining Active Directory, group policy, and a heck of a lot
more security than Professional, as well as servers for DNS, DHCP, and
basic operation of Internet client servers (i.e. IIS and all its
components). That's just off the top of my head -- there are far more
major differences, too.
> both os have mostly the same utilities.
Haven't played with Server much, have you?
| |
|
| too stupid to take the exam?
I don't think so chap.
the exams are installing, configuring and maintaining win2k pro and win2k
server.
the installation process is virtually identical
most of the services are similar
both os have mostly the same utilities.
since both os have so many similarities, I was wondering how different the
exams were.
ps - your a jack XXX-
if you can't help, then DONT.
"Philip Black" <philip_black@hotpop.com> wrote in message
news:Wy1k9.557$Vy3.8182@newscontent-01.sprint.ca...
> Your too stupid to take the XXXXing exam !!!
> Give up while your ahead , if you dont even know the majour differences
> between a workstation and a server.
> "AS" <astaubin@videotron.ca> wrote in message
> news:QlEj9.22399$32.414371@weber.videotron.net...
> > Good afternoon folks,
> >
> > Im going to start the MCSA next week.
> >
> > What are the differences between 70-210 install, etc 2k pro, and 70-215
> > install configure, etc, 2k server.
> >
> > I understand that they are 2 different OS but they are so similar, how
> > different can the exams be?
> >
> >
> > AS
> >
> >
> >
>
>
| |
|
| thats exactly what I meant.
thanks.
> Ah, Philip, you're always such a ray of sunshine when you visit this
> group!
>
> It's a legit question, as there is a great deal of overlap, especially
> in install procedures, even if the focus of the exam is server, not
> desktop functions.
>
>
> > "AS" <astaubin@videotron.ca> wrote in message
> > news:QlEj9.22399$32.414371@weber.videotron.net...
> >> Good afternoon folks,
> >>
> >> Im going to start the MCSA next week.
> >>
> >> What are the differences between 70-210 install, etc 2k pro, and 70-
> 215
> >> install configure, etc, 2k server.
> >>
> >> I understand that they are 2 different OS but they are so similar, how
> >> different can the exams be?
| |
| Jeffrey L. Woods 2002-09-24, 6:29 pm |
| In article <rW5k9.12566$aQ2.330229@weber.videotron.net>,
astaubin@videotron.ca says...
> too stupid to take the exam?
> I don't think so chap.
There's a vast difference between stupid and ignorant. You're likely
smart enough to learn what you need to know, and hopefully smart enough
to realize what you don't know.
> the exams are installing, configuring and maintaining win2k pro and win2k
> server.
>
> the installation process is virtually identical
> most of the services are similar
Nope. Most of the services are NOT similar. Running W2K Server
includes maintaining Active Directory, group policy, and a heck of a lot
more security than Professional, as well as servers for DNS, DHCP, and
basic operation of Internet client servers (i.e. IIS and all its
components). That's just off the top of my head -- there are far more
major differences, too.
> both os have mostly the same utilities.
Haven't played with Server much, have you?
| |
|
| I have advanced server installed.
I was talking about the basic services such as application manager, com+,
ftp publishing service, iis admin service, indexing service, plug and play,
print spooler..
not dns, dhcp and active dir.
"Jeffrey L. Woods" <jeff@deltacomm.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.17fab7e41c8aa91e9896d3@west.usenetserver.com...
> In article <rW5k9.12566$aQ2.330229@weber.videotron.net>,
> astaubin@videotron.ca says...
>
> > too stupid to take the exam?
> > I don't think so chap.
>
> There's a vast difference between stupid and ignorant. You're likely
> smart enough to learn what you need to know, and hopefully smart enough
> to realize what you don't know.
>
> > the exams are installing, configuring and maintaining win2k pro and
win2k
> > server.
> >
> > the installation process is virtually identical
> > most of the services are similar
>
> Nope. Most of the services are NOT similar. Running W2K Server
> includes maintaining Active Directory, group policy, and a heck of a lot
> more security than Professional, as well as servers for DNS, DHCP, and
> basic operation of Internet client servers (i.e. IIS and all its
> components). That's just off the top of my head -- there are far more
> major differences, too.
>
> > both os have mostly the same utilities.
>
> Haven't played with Server much, have you?
>
>
| |
|
| I have advanced server installed.
I was talking about the basic services such as application manager, com+,
ftp publishing service, iis admin service, indexing service, plug and play,
print spooler..
not dns, dhcp and active dir.
"Jeffrey L. Woods" <jeff@deltacomm.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.17fab7e41c8aa91e9896d3@west.usenetserver.com...
> In article <rW5k9.12566$aQ2.330229@weber.videotron.net>,
> astaubin@videotron.ca says...
>
> > too stupid to take the exam?
> > I don't think so chap.
>
> There's a vast difference between stupid and ignorant. You're likely
> smart enough to learn what you need to know, and hopefully smart enough
> to realize what you don't know.
>
> > the exams are installing, configuring and maintaining win2k pro and
win2k
> > server.
> >
> > the installation process is virtually identical
> > most of the services are similar
>
> Nope. Most of the services are NOT similar. Running W2K Server
> includes maintaining Active Directory, group policy, and a heck of a lot
> more security than Professional, as well as servers for DNS, DHCP, and
> basic operation of Internet client servers (i.e. IIS and all its
> components). That's just off the top of my head -- there are far more
> major differences, too.
>
> > both os have mostly the same utilities.
>
> Haven't played with Server much, have you?
>
>
| |
| Philip Black 2002-09-25, 10:29 am |
| My appologies!!, dont always mean to be such gloom i really should more
sensible questions!.
"MCSEwannabe" <MCSEwannabe@invalid.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9293897E6668MCSEwannab
e123@204.127.202.16...
> "Philip Black" <philip_black@hotpop.com> wrote:
>
> > Your too stupid to take the XXXXing exam !!!
> > Give up while your ahead , if you dont even know the majour differences
> > between a workstation and a server.
>
> Ah, Philip, you're always such a ray of sunshine when you visit this
> group!
>
> It's a legit question, as there is a great deal of overlap, especially
> in install procedures, even if the focus of the exam is server, not
> desktop functions.
>
>
> > "AS" <astaubin@videotron.ca> wrote in message
> > news:QlEj9.22399$32.414371@weber.videotron.net...
> >> Good afternoon folks,
> >>
> >> Im going to start the MCSA next week.
> >>
> >> What are the differences between 70-210 install, etc 2k pro, and 70-
> 215
> >> install configure, etc, 2k server.
> >>
> >> I understand that they are 2 different OS but they are so similar, how
> >> different can the exams be?
| |
| Philip Black 2002-09-25, 11:29 am |
| My appologies!!, dont always mean to be such gloom i really should more
sensible questions!.
"MCSEwannabe" <MCSEwannabe@invalid.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9293897E6668MCSEwannab
e123@204.127.202.16...
> "Philip Black" <philip_black@hotpop.com> wrote:
>
> > Your too stupid to take the XXXXing exam !!!
> > Give up while your ahead , if you dont even know the majour differences
> > between a workstation and a server.
>
> Ah, Philip, you're always such a ray of sunshine when you visit this
> group!
>
> It's a legit question, as there is a great deal of overlap, especially
> in install procedures, even if the focus of the exam is server, not
> desktop functions.
>
>
> > "AS" <astaubin@videotron.ca> wrote in message
> > news:QlEj9.22399$32.414371@weber.videotron.net...
> >> Good afternoon folks,
> >>
> >> Im going to start the MCSA next week.
> >>
> >> What are the differences between 70-210 install, etc 2k pro, and 70-
> 215
> >> install configure, etc, 2k server.
> >>
> >> I understand that they are 2 different OS but they are so similar, how
> >> different can the exams be?
| |
| Philip Black 2002-09-25, 11:29 am |
| sorry i dont check over my e-mails for spelling mistakes or mis hit keys i'm
not really that lame , and you arent really that important for me to use
the spell checker that would waste a full 2 second of my life !.
"DanS" <reeejf@ptdd.net> wrote in message
news:3d90b4e3.22531422@news.ptd.net...
> On Tue, 24 Sep 2002 13:48:35 -0400, "Philip Black"
> <philip_black@hotpop.com> wrote:
>
> >Your too stupid to take the XXXXing exam !!!
> >Give up while your ahead , if you dont even know the majour differences
>
> At least he can spell
>
| |
| Philip Black 2002-09-25, 11:29 am |
| Sorry i'll take my statement and use ignorant.
"Jeffrey L. Woods" <jeff@deltacomm.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.17fab7e41c8aa91e9896d3@west.usenetserver.com...
> In article <rW5k9.12566$aQ2.330229@weber.videotron.net>,
> astaubin@videotron.ca says...
>
> > too stupid to take the exam?
> > I don't think so chap.
>
> There's a vast difference between stupid and ignorant. You're likely
> smart enough to learn what you need to know, and hopefully smart enough
> to realize what you don't know.
>
> > the exams are installing, configuring and maintaining win2k pro and
win2k
> > server.
> >
> > the installation process is virtually identical
> > most of the services are similar
>
> Nope. Most of the services are NOT similar. Running W2K Server
> includes maintaining Active Directory, group policy, and a heck of a lot
> more security than Professional, as well as servers for DNS, DHCP, and
> basic operation of Internet client servers (i.e. IIS and all its
> components). That's just off the top of my head -- there are far more
> major differences, too.
>
> > both os have mostly the same utilities.
>
> Haven't played with Server much, have you?
>
>
| |
| Philip Black 2002-09-25, 12:29 pm |
| sorry i dont check over my e-mails for spelling mistakes or mis hit keys i'm
not really that lame , and you arent really that important for me to use
the spell checker that would waste a full 2 second of my life !.
"DanS" <reeejf@ptdd.net> wrote in message
news:3d90b4e3.22531422@news.ptd.net...
> On Tue, 24 Sep 2002 13:48:35 -0400, "Philip Black"
> <philip_black@hotpop.com> wrote:
>
> >Your too stupid to take the XXXXing exam !!!
> >Give up while your ahead , if you dont even know the majour differences
>
> At least he can spell
>
| |
| Philip Black 2002-09-25, 12:29 pm |
| Sorry i'll take my statement and use ignorant.
"Jeffrey L. Woods" <jeff@deltacomm.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.17fab7e41c8aa91e9896d3@west.usenetserver.com...
> In article <rW5k9.12566$aQ2.330229@weber.videotron.net>,
> astaubin@videotron.ca says...
>
> > too stupid to take the exam?
> > I don't think so chap.
>
> There's a vast difference between stupid and ignorant. You're likely
> smart enough to learn what you need to know, and hopefully smart enough
> to realize what you don't know.
>
> > the exams are installing, configuring and maintaining win2k pro and
win2k
> > server.
> >
> > the installation process is virtually identical
> > most of the services are similar
>
> Nope. Most of the services are NOT similar. Running W2K Server
> includes maintaining Active Directory, group policy, and a heck of a lot
> more security than Professional, as well as servers for DNS, DHCP, and
> basic operation of Internet client servers (i.e. IIS and all its
> components). That's just off the top of my head -- there are far more
> major differences, too.
>
> > both os have mostly the same utilities.
>
> Haven't played with Server much, have you?
>
>
| |
| Georges Thibault 2002-09-25, 8:29 pm |
| What I suggest to my students is to book the exam within a week, the
material is similar, one will explore the disibility etc.. the other network
services but they are similar, and the studying material is almost the same.
Georges Thibault
"Philip Black" <philip_black@hotpop.com> wrote in message
news:fhlk9.695$Vy3.9859@newscontent-01.sprint.ca...
> Sorry i'll take my statement and use ignorant.
>
> "Jeffrey L. Woods" <jeff@deltacomm.com> wrote in message
> news:MPG.17fab7e41c8aa91e9896d3@west.usenetserver.com...
> > In article <rW5k9.12566$aQ2.330229@weber.videotron.net>,
> > astaubin@videotron.ca says...
> >
> > > too stupid to take the exam?
> > > I don't think so chap.
> >
> > There's a vast difference between stupid and ignorant. You're likely
> > smart enough to learn what you need to know, and hopefully smart enough
> > to realize what you don't know.
> >
> > > the exams are installing, configuring and maintaining win2k pro and
> win2k
> > > server.
> > >
> > > the installation process is virtually identical
> > > most of the services are similar
> >
> > Nope. Most of the services are NOT similar. Running W2K Server
> > includes maintaining Active Directory, group policy, and a heck of a lot
> > more security than Professional, as well as servers for DNS, DHCP, and
> > basic operation of Internet client servers (i.e. IIS and all its
> > components). That's just off the top of my head -- there are far more
> > major differences, too.
> >
> > > both os have mostly the same utilities.
> >
> > Haven't played with Server much, have you?
> >
> >
>
>
| |
| Georges Thibault 2002-09-25, 9:29 pm |
| What I suggest to my students is to book the exam within a week, the
material is similar, one will explore the disibility etc.. the other network
services but they are similar, and the studying material is almost the same.
Georges Thibault
"Philip Black" <philip_black@hotpop.com> wrote in message
news:fhlk9.695$Vy3.9859@newscontent-01.sprint.ca...
> Sorry i'll take my statement and use ignorant.
>
> "Jeffrey L. Woods" <jeff@deltacomm.com> wrote in message
> news:MPG.17fab7e41c8aa91e9896d3@west.usenetserver.com...
> > In article <rW5k9.12566$aQ2.330229@weber.videotron.net>,
> > astaubin@videotron.ca says...
> >
> > > too stupid to take the exam?
> > > I don't think so chap.
> >
> > There's a vast difference between stupid and ignorant. You're likely
> > smart enough to learn what you need to know, and hopefully smart enough
> > to realize what you don't know.
> >
> > > the exams are installing, configuring and maintaining win2k pro and
> win2k
> > > server.
> > >
> > > the installation process is virtually identical
> > > most of the services are similar
> >
> > Nope. Most of the services are NOT similar. Running W2K Server
> > includes maintaining Active Directory, group policy, and a heck of a lot
> > more security than Professional, as well as servers for DNS, DHCP, and
> > basic operation of Internet client servers (i.e. IIS and all its
> > components). That's just off the top of my head -- there are far more
> > major differences, too.
> >
> > > both os have mostly the same utilities.
> >
> > Haven't played with Server much, have you?
> >
> >
>
>
|
|
|
|
|