| Author |
Terminal Services or PC Anywhere
|
|
| Confused 2002-11-30, 10:24 am |
| Which Program would you lot say is better for remotely administrating the Server
PC Anywhere or Terminal Services?
thanks
| |
|
| Terminal Services and it's already available if you plan to administer a
Windows 2000 server.
"Confused" <sven_137@angelfire.com> wrote in message
news:791aa6ec.0211300744.7768616d@posting.google.com...
> Which Program would you lot say is better for remotely administrating the
Server
>
> PC Anywhere or Terminal Services?
>
> thanks
| |
|
| Yes I know... but is it better ?
"none" <fake@fake.com> wrote in message
news:FB5G9.11078$Qr.209094@news3.calgary.shaw.ca...
> Terminal Services and it's already available if you plan to administer a
> Windows 2000 server.
>
> "Confused" <sven_137@angelfire.com> wrote in message
> news:791aa6ec.0211300744.7768616d@posting.google.com...
> > Which Program would you lot say is better for remotely administrating
the
> Server
> >
> > PC Anywhere or Terminal Services?
> >
> > thanks
>
>
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =-----
| |
|
| Yes.
"Blaze" <asfdaf@aff.com> wrote in message
news:3dea7034_2@corp.newsgroups.com...
> Yes I know... but is it better ?
>
> "none" <fake@fake.com> wrote in message
> news:FB5G9.11078$Qr.209094@news3.calgary.shaw.ca...
> > Terminal Services and it's already available if you plan to administer a
> > Windows 2000 server.
> >
> > "Confused" <sven_137@angelfire.com> wrote in message
> > news:791aa6ec.0211300744.7768616d@posting.google.com...
> > > Which Program would you lot say is better for remotely administrating
> the
> > Server
> > >
> > > PC Anywhere or Terminal Services?
> > >
> > > thanks
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
> http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
> -----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =-----
| |
|
| Well, it depends what you want to do. PC Anywhere will give you console
access, while TS only gives you a session. PCA is crap though. It's caused
alot of issues on our servers so now we use a product called Radmin. it's a
pretty sweet product.
"none" <fake@fake.com> wrote in message
news:JsvG9.17700$Qr.334719@news3.calgary.shaw.ca...
> Yes.
>
> "Blaze" <asfdaf@aff.com> wrote in message
> news:3dea7034_2@corp.newsgroups.com...
> > Yes I know... but is it better ?
> >
> > "none" <fake@fake.com> wrote in message
> > news:FB5G9.11078$Qr.209094@news3.calgary.shaw.ca...
> > > Terminal Services and it's already available if you plan to administer
a[col
or=darkred]
> > > Windows 2000 server.
> > >
> > > "Confused" <sven_137@angelfire.com> wrote in message
> > > news:791aa6ec.0211300744.7768616d@posting.google.com...
> > > > Which Program would you lot say is better for remotely[/color]
administrating[col
or=green]
> > the
> > > Server
> > > >
> > > > PC Anywhere or Terminal Services?
> > > >
> > > > thanks
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
> > http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
> > -----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =-----
>
>[/color]
| |
|
| Use VNC....it's free
"Rib" <rib@home.com> wrote in message
news:LuaH9.3383$Q71.1007@news01.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com...
> Well, it depends what you want to do. PC Anywhere will give you console
> access, while TS only gives you a session. PCA is crap though. It's
caused
> alot of issues on our servers so now we use a product called Radmin. it's
a
> pretty sweet product.
> "none" <fake@fake.com> wrote in message
> news:JsvG9.17700$Qr.334719@news3.calgary.shaw.ca...
> > Yes.
> >
> > "Blaze" <asfdaf@aff.com> wrote in message
> > news:3dea7034_2@corp.newsgroups.com...
> > > Yes I know... but is it better ?
> > >
> > > "none" <fake@fake.com> wrote in message
> > > news:FB5G9.11078$Qr.209094@news3.calgary.shaw.ca...
> > > > Terminal Services and it's already available if you plan to
administer
> a
> > > > Windows 2000 server.
> > > >
> > > > "Confused" <sven_137@angelfire.com> wrote in message
> > > > news:791aa6ec.0211300744.7768616d@posting.google.com...
> > > > > Which Program would you lot say is better for remotely
> administrating[co
lor=darkred]
> > > the
> > > > Server
> > > > >
> > > > > PC Anywhere or Terminal Services?
> > > > >
> > > > > thanks
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
> > > http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
> > > -----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =-----
> >
> >
>
>[/color]
| |
| Andrew Miller 2002-12-07, 10:24 am |
| Use Gotomypc..it is non-intrusive and has the best interface...its not free
but it has worked in every environment we have deployed it. Also it only
uses outbound ports so you don't have top compromise your firewall security
to gain remote control across the internet. www.gotomypc.com
"JP" <bearnjay@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:uuqkilh1hr9vb1@corp.supernews.com...
> Use VNC....it's free
>
>
>
> "Rib" <rib@home.com> wrote in message
> news:LuaH9.3383$Q71.1007@news01.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com...
> > Well, it depends what you want to do. PC Anywhere will give you console
> > access, while TS only gives you a session. PCA is crap though. It's
> caused
> > alot of issues on our servers so now we use a product called Radmin.
it's
> a
> > pretty sweet product.
> > "none" <fake@fake.com> wrote in message
> > news:JsvG9.17700$Qr.334719@news3.calgary.shaw.ca...
> > > Yes.
> > >
> > > "Blaze" <asfdaf@aff.com> wrote in message
> > > news:3dea7034_2@corp.newsgroups.com...
> > > > Yes I know... but is it better ?
> > > >
> > > > "none" <fake@fake.com> wrote in message
> > > > news:FB5G9.11078$Qr.209094@news3.calgary.shaw.ca...
> > > > > Terminal Services and it's already available if you plan to
> administer
> > a
> > > > > Windows 2000 server.
> > > > >
> > > > > "Confused" <sven_137@angelfire.com> wrote in message
> > > > > news:791aa6ec.0211300744.7768616d@posting.google.com...
> > > > > > Which Program would you lot say is better for remotely
> > administrating
> > > > the
> > > > > Server
> > > > > >
> > > > > > PC Anywhere or Terminal Services?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > thanks
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
> > > > http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
> > > > -----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =-----
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
______________________________
______________________________
__________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Still Only $9.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>
| |
| Jeff Schuler 2002-12-14, 11:26 am |
| Terminal services is the fastest, most stable of the Remote Control options.
However, no console access so if your running a machine and need console
access you're outta luck.. .Net server does have the ability to get console
access via terminal services so MS has recognized this need and provided a
solution.
I'd suggest VNC for remote use if you need console access. Its small,
fairly stable, and comes in a variety of flavors (encrypted, compressed,
wide open, etc...)
The only reason I'd suggest PCA or ControlIT is if you want to roll it out
to your whole enterprise and have centralized Mgt of the setups. We used
ControlIT like that for a while on about 50 servers but got tired of playing
the patch game. Plus the version on our NT4.0 boxes didn't play with the
version for the 2000 boxex. And you couldn't run both versions on the same
machine so you had to have 2 different machines (or dual boot) just to
remote control all your machines. I do not recommend ControlIT
So... in a nutshell... If you've got a win2k environment, use terminal
services. Its very rare that anyone needs console access. If you do have a
box that requires console access, load VNC on it.
A guy in the UK has put together a nice script that allows you to push
installs of VNC out to remote NT/2k boxes and automates the setup. He calls
it fastpush. Its really nice. http://www.darkage.co.uk/index.htm It comes
with an easily configurable setup and all the major flavors of VNC
Jeff Schuler.
MCSE
"Confused" <sven_137@angelfire.com> wrote in message
news:791aa6ec.0211300744.7768616d@posting.google.com...
> Which Program would you lot say is better for remotely administrating the
Server
>
> PC Anywhere or Terminal Services?
>
> thanks
| |
| Paul E Larson 2002-12-14, 2:25 pm |
| "Jeff Schuler" <schuler_jeff@cox.net> wrote in
news:2wJK9.58879$jf7.3742679@news2.west.cox.net:
> Terminal services is the fastest, most stable of the Remote Control
> options. However, no console access so if your running a machine and
> need console access you're outta luck..
> "Confused" <sven_137@angelfire.com> wrote in message
> news:791aa6ec.0211300744.7768616d@posting.google.com...
>> Which Program would you lot say is better for remotely administrating
>> the
> Server
>>
>> PC Anywhere or Terminal Services?
>>
Terminal Services in Remote Administrator Mode. You can access all the
Admin tools and if needed reboot the server from it.
Paul
| |
|
| Hi !
Try VNC... It's free and very usefull !!
http://download.com.com/3000-2085-8...tml?tag=lst-0-2
Hugo
"Paul E Larson" <whistler@twcny.rr.com> a écrit dans le message de news:
Xns92E4999375855whistlertwcnyr
rcom@24.24.2.166...
> "Jeff Schuler" <schuler_jeff@cox.net> wrote in
> news:2wJK9.58879$jf7.3742679@news2.west.cox.net:
>
> > Terminal services is the fastest, most stable of the Remote Control
> > options. However, no console access so if your running a machine and
> > need console access you're outta luck..
>
> > "Confused" <sven_137@angelfire.com> wrote in message
> > news:791aa6ec.0211300744.7768616d@posting.google.com...
> >> Which Program would you lot say is better for remotely administrating
> >> the
> > Server
> >>
> >> PC Anywhere or Terminal Services?
> >>
>
> Terminal Services in Remote Administrator Mode. You can access all the
> Admin tools and if needed reboot the server from it.
>
> Paul
|
|
|
|