|
Home > Archive > alt.certification.cne > July 2002 > is this a dead newsgroup
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
is this a dead newsgroup
|
|
| Frédéric 2002-07-25, 6:25 pm |
| Hi
I don't see much post on Netware. Is this a dead newsgroup or is Novell
products really out of market
--
Frédéric
A+, CIW, i-Net+
http://fredsfastcram.netfirms.com
--
| |
| Unikrom! 2002-07-25, 8:25 pm |
| Neither
It's just Novell works with little or no troubles (unlike other (M$)
products) thus people do not require assistance via the News Groups
Unikrom
A+, Network+, CNA
"Frédéric" <frederic_quebec2002@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Iu009.1185$sB5.110467@wagner.videotron.net...
> Hi
>
> I don't see much post on Netware. Is this a dead newsgroup or is Novell
> products really out of market
>
> --
> Frédéric
> A+, CIW, i-Net+
> http://fredsfastcram.netfirms.com
>
> --
>
>
| |
| Frédéric 2002-07-25, 9:25 pm |
| Using the same logic Red Hat product (linux) is perfect that is why there is
no post in alt.certification.redhat
We have 30 Netware 4.11 servers at the job and tape backups give us a hell.
We also have tape backup on NT servers and everything is fine. We reboot
Netware servers much more often and we have to reload drivers much more
often. I'm not generalising and I know this is old technology. We didn't
upgraded to Netware 5 and choose Windows 2000 Servers instead. I was
wondering how many companies did the same move, (bye bye Novell and Hurray
Microsoft)
--
Frédéric
A+, CIW, i-Net+
http://fredsfastcram.netfirms.com
--
"Unikrom!" <unikrom@Not_Hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Iw109.16343$A72.90670@news1.mts.net...
> Neither
>
> It's just Novell works with little or no troubles (unlike other (M$)
> products) thus people do not require assistance via the News Groups
>
> Unikrom
> A+, Network+, CNA
>
>
> "Frédéric" <frederic_quebec2002@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:Iu009.1185$sB5.110467@wagner.videotron.net...
> > Hi
> >
> > I don't see much post on Netware. Is this a dead newsgroup or is Novell
> > products really out of market
> >
> > --
> > Frédéric
> > A+, CIW, i-Net+
> > http://fredsfastcram.netfirms.com
> >
> > --
> >
> >
>
>
| |
| Unikrom! 2002-07-25, 10:25 pm |
| We have Novell 5.1, NT4/2000 & Unix servers here and I notice that we have
more problems with NT then anyother servers. I have noticed that M$ has
improved on NT but it still causes us more problems then Novell or Unix.
I do know that companies leave Novell to jump on the M$ Band Wagon cause
everyone else is doing it.
"Frédéric" <frederic_quebec2002@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:6Z209.1991$sB5.231146@wagner.videotron.net...
> Using the same logic Red Hat product (linux) is perfect that is why there
is
> no post in alt.certification.redhat
> We have 30 Netware 4.11 servers at the job and tape backups give us a
hell.
> We also have tape backup on NT servers and everything is fine. We reboot
> Netware servers much more often and we have to reload drivers much more
> often. I'm not generalising and I know this is old technology. We didn't
> upgraded to Netware 5 and choose Windows 2000 Servers instead. I was
> wondering how many companies did the same move, (bye bye Novell and Hurray
> Microsoft)
>
> --
> Frédéric
> A+, CIW, i-Net+
> http://fredsfastcram.netfirms.com
>
> --
> "Unikrom!" <unikrom@Not_Hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:Iw109.16343$A72.90670@news1.mts.net...
> > Neither
> >
> > It's just Novell works with little or no troubles (unlike other (M$)
> > products) thus people do not require assistance via the News Groups
> >
> > Unikrom
> > A+, Network+, CNA
> >
> >
> > "Frédéric" <frederic_quebec2002@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > news:Iu009.1185$sB5.110467@wagner.videotron.net...
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > I don't see much post on Netware. Is this a dead newsgroup or is
Novell
> > > products really out of market
> > >
> > > --
> > > Frédéric
> > > A+, CIW, i-Net+
> > > http://fredsfastcram.netfirms.com
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
|
|
|
|
|