|
Home > Archive > alt.certification.cne > July 2002 > Re: hello all
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
|
|
| father Christmas 2002-07-21, 9:25 am |
| Hi Jello
I like you, but I think you 'are' the Spammer and your name is the give
away. For ages you have persistently referred to DiamondDan as the K Y
Jelly man Now your surname is 'Jello' Now that was Ingenious
Yo ho ho
Father Christmas
"hello jello" <bobbigirl@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:aJn_8.17545$Ag2.876384@news2.calgary.shaw.ca...
> "to each your own"
>
> "John D." <jcdech@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:e821bab6.0207200931.4cdbb2a7@posting.google.com...
> > You're missing what attractive really means if you only are referring
> > to appearances (that's somewhat shallow, don't you think?): If you
> > really are a female, you'd be more "attractive" if you wrote
> > better...coming across as uneducated is never attractive...leave that
> > to the truly educationally-challenged (a PC term for resident/visiting
> > liberals to understand) one often encounters in these various
> > newsgroups.
> >
> > John D.
> >
> >
> >
> > "hello jello" <sjbm@shaw.ca> wrote in message
> news:<kG7_8.15417$f05.724059@news1.calgary.shaw.ca>...
> > > guess the jokes on u. im a female whos quite attractive and trying to
> get
> > > my certification. maybe u should grow up
> > >
>
>
| |
| Tom MacIntyre 2002-07-21, 10:25 am |
| On Sun, 21 Jul 2002 15:32:17 +0100, "father Christmas"
<upyours@XXXXXXX.com> wrote:
>Hi Jello
>I like you, but I think you 'are' the Spammer and your name is the give
>away. For ages you have persistently referred to DiamondDan as the K Y
>Jelly man Now your surname is 'Jello' Now that was Ingenious
>
>Yo ho ho
Must've moved to Calgary too...
Tom
>
>Father Christmas
>"hello jello" <bobbigirl@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:aJn_8.17545$Ag2.876384@news2.calgary.shaw.ca...
>> "to each your own"
>>
>> "John D." <jcdech@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:e821bab6.0207200931.4cdbb2a7@posting.google.com...
>> > You're missing what attractive really means if you only are referring
>> > to appearances (that's somewhat shallow, don't you think?): If you
>> > really are a female, you'd be more "attractive" if you wrote
>> > better...coming across as uneducated is never attractive...leave that
>> > to the truly educationally-challenged (a PC term for resident/visiting
>> > liberals to understand) one often encounters in these various
>> > newsgroups.
>> >
>> > John D.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > "hello jello" <sjbm@shaw.ca> wrote in message
>> news:<kG7_8.15417$f05.724059@news1.calgary.shaw.ca>...
>> > > guess the jokes on u. im a female whos quite attractive and trying to
>> get
>> > > my certification. maybe u should grow up
>> > >
>>
>>
>
>
| |
| hello jello 2002-07-21, 11:25 am |
| you guys are crazy. I am not the spammer never been in this newsgroup before
and my nick is nothing, I used hello jello that's it not reference to
anybody else. I REPEAT! I am here to get my certification, so stop telling
me im a spammer when im not! I have better things to do!
"Tom MacIntyre" <tom__macintyre@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3d3b0ae0.136901448@news.wolf...
> On Sun, 21 Jul 2002 15:32:17 +0100, "father Christmas"
> <upyours@XXXXXXX.com> wrote:
>
> >Hi Jello
> >I like you, but I think you 'are' the Spammer and your name is the give
> >away. For ages you have persistently referred to DiamondDan as the K Y
> >Jelly man Now your surname is 'Jello' Now that was Ingenious
> >
> >Yo ho ho
>
> Must've moved to Calgary too...
>
> Tom
>
> >
> >Father Christmas
> >"hello jello" <bobbigirl@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >news:aJn_8.17545$Ag2.876384@news2.calgary.shaw.ca...
> >> "to each your own"
> >>
> >> "John D." <jcdech@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >> news:e821bab6.0207200931.4cdbb2a7@posting.google.com...
> >> > You're missing what attractive really means if you only are referring
> >> > to appearances (that's somewhat shallow, don't you think?): If you
> >> > really are a female, you'd be more "attractive" if you wrote
> >> > better...coming across as uneducated is never attractive...leave that
> >> > to the truly educationally-challenged (a PC term for
resident/ visiting
> >> > liberals to understand) one often encounters in these various
> >> > newsgroups.
> >> >
> >> > John D.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > "hello jello" <sjbm@shaw.ca> wrote in message
> >> news:<kG7_8.15417$f05.724059@news1.calgary.shaw.ca>...
> >> > > guess the jokes on u. im a female whos quite attractive and trying
to[co
lor=darkred]
> >> get
> >> > > my certification. maybe u should grow up
> >> > >
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>[/color]
| |
| S.O'Brien 2002-07-21, 11:25 am |
| "hello jello" <bobbigirl@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:MeB_8.19922$Ag2.982273@news2.calgary.shaw.ca...
> you guys are crazy. I am not the spammer never been in this newsgroup
before
> and my nick is nothing, I used hello jello that's it not reference to
> anybody else. I REPEAT! I am here to get my certification, so stop telling
> me im a spammer when im not! I have better things to do!
>
Don't worry about it... your headers speak for themselves. Our spammer
lives in the UK while you live in Calgary.
Sue
| |
| Tom MacIntyre 2002-07-21, 11:25 am |
| On Sun, 21 Jul 2002 16:24:12 GMT, "hello jello"
<bobbigirl@hotmail.com> wrote:
>you guys are crazy. I am not the spammer never been in this newsgroup before
>and my nick is nothing, I used hello jello that's it not reference to
>anybody else. I REPEAT! I am here to get my certification, so stop telling
>me im a spammer when im not! I have better things to do!
I didn't make the accusation. I actually pointed out that, due to the
geographical inconsistency, it is actually UNlikely that you are the
spammer.
Tom...a fellow Canuck, eh!
>
>"Tom MacIntyre" <tom__macintyre@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:3d3b0ae0.136901448@news.wolf...
>> On Sun, 21 Jul 2002 15:32:17 +0100, "father Christmas"
>> <upyours@XXXXXXX.com> wrote:
>>
>> >Hi Jello
>> >I like you, but I think you 'are' the Spammer and your name is the give
>> >away. For ages you have persistently referred to DiamondDan as the K Y
>> >Jelly man Now your surname is 'Jello' Now that was Ingenious
>> >
>> >Yo ho ho
>>
>> Must've moved to Calgary too...
>>
>> Tom
>>
>> >
>> >Father Christmas
>> >"hello jello" <bobbigirl@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> >news:aJn_8.17545$Ag2.876384@news2.calgary.shaw.ca...
>> >> "to each your own"
>> >>
>> >> "John D." <jcdech@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> >> news:e821bab6.0207200931.4cdbb2a7@posting.google.com...
>> >> > You're missing what attractive really means if you only are referring
>> >> > to appearances (that's somewhat shallow, don't you think?): If you
>> >> > really are a female, you'd be more "attractive" if you wrote
>> >> > better...coming across as uneducated is never attractive...leave that
>> >> > to the truly educationally-challenged (a PC term for
>resident/ visiting
>> >> > liberals to understand) one often encounters in these various
>> >> > newsgroups.
>> >> >
>> >> > John D.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > "hello jello" <sjbm@shaw.ca> wrote in message
>> >> news:<kG7_8.15417$f05.724059@news1.calgary.shaw.ca>...
>> >> > > guess the jokes on u. im a female whos quite attractive and trying
> to
>> >> get
>> >> > > my certification. maybe u should grow up
>> >> > >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
| |
| hello jello 2002-07-21, 11:25 am |
| Thank you,
know I can study hopefully in peace without being called the spammer!
"S.O'Brien" <netsvcc@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:ykB_8.48174$WsS.20138@news01.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com...
> "hello jello" <bobbigirl@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:MeB_8.19922$Ag2.982273@news2.calgary.shaw.ca...
> > you guys are crazy. I am not the spammer never been in this newsgroup
> before
> > and my nick is nothing, I used hello jello that's it not reference to
> > anybody else. I REPEAT! I am here to get my certification, so stop
telling
> > me im a spammer when im not! I have better things to do!
> >
>
> Don't worry about it... your headers speak for themselves. Our spammer
> lives in the UK while you live in Calgary.
>
> Sue
>
>
| |
| father Christmas 2002-07-21, 2:25 pm |
| So am I the spammer because I live in Londinium ive got bad teeth and bad
breath and i cant spewll ?
God Save our gracious Queen
Yo ho ho and a bottle of rum
Father Christmas
"Tom MacIntyre" <tom__macintyre@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3d3b1b95.141178803@news.wolf...
> On Sun, 21 Jul 2002 16:24:12 GMT, "hello jello"
> <bobbigirl@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >you guys are crazy. I am not the spammer never been in this newsgroup
before
> >and my nick is nothing, I used hello jello that's it not reference to
> >anybody else. I REPEAT! I am here to get my certification, so stop
telling
> >me im a spammer when im not! I have better things to do!
>
> I didn't make the accusation. I actually pointed out that, due to the
> geographical inconsistency, it is actually UNlikely that you are the
> spammer.
>
> Tom...a fellow Canuck, eh!
>
> >
> >"Tom MacIntyre" <tom__macintyre@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >news:3d3b0ae0.136901448@news.wolf...
> >> On Sun, 21 Jul 2002 15:32:17 +0100, "father Christmas"
> >> <upyours@XXXXXXX.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Hi Jello
> >> >I like you, but I think you 'are' the Spammer and your name is the
give[
color=darkred]
> >> >away. For ages you have persistently referred to DiamondDan as the K[/color]
Y[col
or=darkred]
> >> >Jelly man Now your surname is 'Jello' Now that was Ingenious
> >> >
> >> >Yo ho ho
> >>
> >> Must've moved to Calgary too...
> >>
> >> Tom
> >>
> >> >
> >> >Father Christmas
> >> >"hello jello" <bobbigirl@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >> >news:aJn_8.17545$Ag2.876384@news2.calgary.shaw.ca...
> >> >> "to each your own"
> >> >>
> >> >> "John D." <jcdech@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >> >> news:e821bab6.0207200931.4cdbb2a7@posting.google.com...
> >> >> > You're missing what attractive really means if you only are[/color]
referring
> >> >> > to appearances (that's somewhat shallow, don't you think?): If you
> >> >> > really are a female, you'd be more "attractive" if you wrote
> >> >> > better...coming across as uneducated is never attractive...leave
that[
color=darkred]
> >> >> > to the truly educationally-challenged (a PC term for
> >resident/visiting
> >> >> > liberals to understand) one often encounters in these various
> >> >> > newsgroups.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > John D.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > "hello jello" <sjbm@shaw.ca> wrote in message
> >> >> news:<kG7_8.15417$f05.724059@news1.calgary.shaw.ca>...
> >> >> > > guess the jokes on u. im a female whos quite attractive and[/color]
trying
> >to
> >> >> get
> >> >> > > my certification. maybe u should grow up
> >> >> > >
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>
| |
| Tom MacIntyre 2002-07-21, 3:25 pm |
| On Sun, 21 Jul 2002 19:31:34 +0100, "father Christmas"
<upyours@XXXXXXX.com> wrote:
>So am I the spammer because I live in Londinium ive got bad teeth and bad
>breath and i cant spewll ?
>God Save our gracious Queen
>Yo ho ho and a bottle of rum
>
>Father Christmas
>
Exclusionary evidence and its implications does not necessarily imply
or eliminate the opposite...the jury is still out.
Tom
>
>"Tom MacIntyre" <tom__macintyre@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:3d3b1b95.141178803@news.wolf...
>> On Sun, 21 Jul 2002 16:24:12 GMT, "hello jello"
>> <bobbigirl@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >you guys are crazy. I am not the spammer never been in this newsgroup
> before
>> >and my nick is nothing, I used hello jello that's it not reference to
>> >anybody else. I REPEAT! I am here to get my certification, so stop
> telling
>> >me im a spammer when im not! I have better things to do!
>>
>> I didn't make the accusation. I actually pointed out that, due to the
>> geographical inconsistency, it is actually UNlikely that you are the
>> spammer.
>>
>> Tom...a fellow Canuck, eh!
>>
>> >
>> >"Tom MacIntyre" <tom__macintyre@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> >news:3d3b0ae0.136901448@news.wolf...
>> >> On Sun, 21 Jul 2002 15:32:17 +0100, "father Christmas"
>> >> <upyours@XXXXXXX.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >Hi Jello
>> >> >I like you, but I think you 'are' the Spammer and your name is the
> give
>> >> >away. For ages you have persistently referred to DiamondDan as the K
>Y
>> >> >Jelly man Now your surname is 'Jello' Now that was Ingenious
>> >> >
>> >> >Yo ho ho
>> >>
>> >> Must've moved to Calgary too...
>> >>
>> >> Tom
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >Father Christmas
>> >> >"hello jello" <bobbigirl@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> >> >news:aJn_8.17545$Ag2.876384@news2.calgary.shaw.ca...
>> >> >> "to each your own"
>> >> >>
>> >> >> "John D." <jcdech@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> >> >> news:e821bab6.0207200931.4cdbb2a7@posting.google.com...
>> >> >> > You're missing what attractive really means if you only are
> referring
>> >> >> > to appearances (that's somewhat shallow, don't you think?): If you
>> >> >> > really are a female, you'd be more "attractive" if you wrote
>> >> >> > better...coming across as uneducated is never attractive...leave
> that
>> >> >> > to the truly educationally-challenged (a PC term for
>> >resident/visiting
>> >> >> > liberals to understand) one often encounters in these various
>> >> >> > newsgroups.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > John D.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > "hello jello" <sjbm@shaw.ca> wrote in message
>> >> >> news:<kG7_8.15417$f05.724059@news1.calgary.shaw.ca>...
>> >> >> > > guess the jokes on u. im a female whos quite attractive and
> trying
>> >to
>> >> >> get
>> >> >> > > my certification. maybe u should grow up
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
| |
| Donkey 2002-07-21, 7:25 pm |
| Maybe this is why it's still not too hard to find a job in the UK - there
seem to be a greater concentration of tossers. It's a bit embarrassing at
the moment that most of the tossers are Brit's, or at least residing in the
UK.
It's a select few I suppose.
How miffed do you think somebody would have to get to abuse their position
and release information about ISP dial up clients.
The logs are awkward and very long, but could be funny.
Wot do you reckon the consequences would be? Worth it?
You Americans get away with it - don't know anybody that supports any US
ISP's.
"Tom MacIntyre" <tom__macintyre@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3d3b5aa4.4561771@news.wolf...
> On Sun, 21 Jul 2002 19:31:34 +0100, "father Christmas"
> <upyours@XXXXXXX.com> wrote:
>
> >So am I the spammer because I live in Londinium ive got bad teeth and bad
> >breath and i cant spewll ?
> >God Save our gracious Queen
> >Yo ho ho and a bottle of rum
> >
> >Father Christmas
> >
>
> Exclusionary evidence and its implications does not necessarily imply
> or eliminate the opposite...the jury is still out.
>
> Tom
>
> >
> >"Tom MacIntyre" <tom__macintyre@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >news:3d3b1b95.141178803@news.wolf...
> >> On Sun, 21 Jul 2002 16:24:12 GMT, "hello jello"
> >> <bobbigirl@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >you guys are crazy. I am not the spammer never been in this newsgroup
> >before
> >> >and my nick is nothing, I used hello jello that's it not reference to
> >> >anybody else. I REPEAT! I am here to get my certification, so stop
> >telling
> >> >me im a spammer when im not! I have better things to do!
> >>
> >> I didn't make the accusation. I actually pointed out that, due to the
> >> geographical inconsistency, it is actually UNlikely that you are the
> >> spammer.
> >>
> >> Tom...a fellow Canuck, eh!
> >>
> >> >
> >> >"Tom MacIntyre" <tom__macintyre@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >> >news:3d3b0ae0.136901448@news.wolf...
> >> >> On Sun, 21 Jul 2002 15:32:17 +0100, "father Christmas"
> >> >> <upyours@XXXXXXX.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >Hi Jello
> >> >> >I like you, but I think you 'are' the Spammer and your name is the
> >give
> >> >> >away. For ages you have persistently referred to DiamondDan as the
K
> >Y
> >> >> >Jelly man Now your surname is 'Jello' Now that was Ingenious
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Yo ho ho
> >> >>
> >> >> Must've moved to Calgary too...
> >> >>
> >> >> Tom
> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Father Christmas
> >> >> >"hello jello" <bobbigirl@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >> >> >news:aJn_8.17545$Ag2.876384@news2.calgary.shaw.ca...
> >> >> >> "to each your own"
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> "John D." <jcdech@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >> >> >> news:e821bab6.0207200931.4cdbb2a7@posting.google.com...
> >> >> >> > You're missing what attractive really means if you only are
> >referring
> >> >> >> > to appearances (that's somewhat shallow, don't you think?): If
you[c
olor=darkred]
> >> >> >> > really are a female, you'd be more "attractive" if you wrote
> >> >> >> > better...coming across as uneducated is never[/color]
attractive... leave
> >that
> >> >> >> > to the truly educationally-challenged (a PC term for
> >> >resident/visiting
> >> >> >> > liberals to understand) one often encounters in these various
> >> >> >> > newsgroups.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > John D.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > "hello jello" <sjbm@shaw.ca> wrote in message
> >> >> >> news:<kG7_8.15417$f05.724059@news1.calgary.shaw.ca>...
> >> >> >> > > guess the jokes on u. im a female whos quite attractive and
> >trying
> >> >to
> >> >> >> get
> >> >> >> > > my certification. maybe u should grow up
> >> >> >> > >
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>
|
|
|
|
|