|
Home > Archive > alt.certification.network-plus > February 2003 > IP #'s and Packets-Mike Meyers
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
IP #'s and Packets-Mike Meyers
|
|
|
| Ok, I am about to graduate-I still don't understand this
What would this be?
127.34.567.0
Compared to
127.34.567.255
Also where can I find good info on packets + Protocols
Finally is RIP a Vertically Diverse Item? I forgot what that thing
was.
I like networking-but the book I have is a real eye ripper. I am sure
If I sit with a Easier Book, Things will materialize.
Thanks-test on Monday-YIKES!
I have to hand it to mike myers-Some folks bash his books, but they do
serve a intended purpose.
I would neevr get through schoolw with out them. I am going to order
His Network Book. thanks Mike!
Thanks To all
tino
| |
| Charles M. Kozierok 2003-02-05, 5:24 pm |
| In article <49eaf5fc.0302051216.693b60f@posting.google.com>,
teak <teak@linuxmail.org> wrote:
} Ok, I am about to graduate-I still don't understand this
}
} What would this be?
}
} 127.34.567.0
}
} Compared to
}
} 127.34.567.255
Well, they'd both be "invalid" since the third number is too large -- it
can't be over 255.  Assuming that you change each to 67, it's still
not clear what you are asking. Since they are both in the 127.x.x.x
block, they are both just loopback addresses. But usually people just
use 127.0.0.1 for that.
If you change the 127 to something else, like say 219, then the first is
the address of a class C (or /24) network. The second (219.34.67.255) is
the directed broadcast address of that network.
} Also where can I find good info on packets + Protocols
Which ones?
} Finally is RIP a Vertically Diverse Item? I forgot what that thing
} was.
"Vertically diverse"? Are you sure that is the right term? I've never
heard it before.
} Thanks-test on Monday-YIKES!
Good luck.
peace,
-*-
charles
| |
| allen953 2003-02-05, 10:24 pm |
|
<snip>
> } Finally is RIP a Vertically Diverse Item? I forgot what that thing
> } was.
>
> "Vertically diverse"? Are you sure that is the right term? I've never
> heard it before.
>
> } Thanks-test on Monday-YIKES!
>
> Good luck.
>
> peace,
>
> -*-
> charles
charles...probably meant "vector distance" (RIP) vice "link state" (OSPF).
AL
Net+ and holding ;-)
| |
| Charles M. Kozierok 2003-02-06, 7:24 am |
| In article <Xfl0a.167886$ui1.4904762@news1.east.cox.net>,
allen953 <allen953@cox.net> wrote:
}
} <snip>
}
} > } Finally is RIP a Vertically Diverse Item? I forgot what that thing
} > } was.
} >
} > "Vertically diverse"? Are you sure that is the right term? I've never
} > heard it before.
}
} charles...probably meant "vector distance" (RIP) vice "link state" (OSPF).
Ah! Yes, I should have figured that out.
Yes, RIP is a distance-vector routing protocol. In fact, it is the classic
example of a DV routing protocol.
peace,
-*-
charles
| |
| Stephen Watkins 2003-02-07, 12:24 am |
| Maybe he means:
127.34.67.0 (network address)
127.34.67.255 (broadcast address)
Stephen.
"Charles M. Kozierok" <ixlu@PCGuide.com> wrote in message
news:b1s4fc$qlr$1@reader1.panix.com...
> In article <49eaf5fc.0302051216.693b60f@posting.google.com>,
> teak <teak@linuxmail.org> wrote:
> } Ok, I am about to graduate-I still don't understand this
> }
> } What would this be?
> }
> } 127.34.567.0
> }
> } Compared to
> }
> } 127.34.567.255
>
> Well, they'd both be "invalid" since the third number is too large -- it
> can't be over 255. Assuming that you change each to 67, it's still
> not clear what you are asking. Since they are both in the 127.x.x.x
> block, they are both just loopback addresses. But usually people just
> use 127.0.0.1 for that.
>
> If you change the 127 to something else, like say 219, then the first is
> the address of a class C (or /24) network. The second (219.34.67.255) is
> the directed broadcast address of that network.
>
> } Also where can I find good info on packets + Protocols
>
> Which ones?
>
> } Finally is RIP a Vertically Diverse Item? I forgot what that thing
> } was.
>
> "Vertically diverse"? Are you sure that is the right term? I've never
> heard it before.
>
> } Thanks-test on Monday-YIKES!
>
> Good luck.
>
> peace,
>
> -*-
> charles
| |
|
| "Stephen Watkins" <swatkins@nospam.clear.net.nz> wrote in message news:<lKH0a.814$324.143983@news02.tsnz.net>...
> Maybe he means:
> 127.34.67.0 (network address)
> 127.34.67.255 (broadcast address)
>
> Stephen.
>
> "Charles M. Kozierok" <ixlu@PCGuide.com> wrote in message
> news:b1s4fc$qlr$1@reader1.panix.com...
> > In article <49eaf5fc.0302051216.693b60f@posting.google.com>,
> > teak <teak@linuxmail.org> wrote:
> > } Ok, I am about to graduate-I still don't understand this
> > }
> > } What would this be?
> > }
> > } 127.34.567.0
> > }
> > } Compared to
> > }
> > } 127.34.567.255
> >
> > Well, they'd both be "invalid" since the third number is too large -- it
> > can't be over 255. Assuming that you change each to 67, it's still
> > not clear what you are asking. Since they are both in the 127.x.x.x
> > block, they are both just loopback addresses. But usually people just
> > use 127.0.0.1 for that.
> >
> > If you change the 127 to something else, like say 219, then the first is
> > the address of a class C (or /24) network. The second (219.34.67.255) is
> > the directed broadcast address of that network.
> >
> > } Also where can I find good info on packets + Protocols
> >
> > Which ones?
> >
> > } Finally is RIP a Vertically Diverse Item? I forgot what that thing
> > } was.
> >
> > "Vertically diverse"? Are you sure that is the right term? I've never
> > heard it before.
> >
> > } Thanks-test on Monday-YIKES!
> >
> > Good luck.
> >
> > peace,
> >
> > -*-
> > charles
Thank you for all your help. All of you. I hope I can pay it back one day.
Yer Bud
Tino
|
|
|
|
|