|
Home > Archive > alt.certification.network-plus > December 2002 > Certificate arrival - timeline
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Certificate arrival - timeline
|
|
| Benjamin 2002-12-03, 7:24 am |
| Hi folks,
I passed back on the 15th of November, and today, Dec 3rd I received my
certificate.
Pretty good, timewise. Although I'm starting to immerse myself in the
70-210 exam and I completely forgot that I'd be getting this thing through
the mail - always a pleasant surprise on a Tuesday morning. 
Cheers all,
Ben
A+ N+
| |
| baglicker 2002-12-03, 10:24 am |
| Why don't you just write 70-270 - winxp pro? Get ahead of the 'renewal'
process.
"Benjamin" <benjenn@attbi.com> wrote in message
news:v%1H9.332$Lb5.12328@news.uswest.net...
> Hi folks,
>
> I passed back on the 15th of November, and today, Dec 3rd I received my
> certificate.
>
> Pretty good, timewise. Although I'm starting to immerse myself in the
> 70-210 exam and I completely forgot that I'd be getting this thing through
> the mail - always a pleasant surprise on a Tuesday morning.
>
> Cheers all,
>
> Ben
> A+ N+
>
>
| |
| Benjamin 2002-12-03, 10:24 am |
|
"baglicker" <anus@myass.com> wrote in message
news:k%3H9.29099$Qr.550055@news3.calgary.shaw.ca...
> Why don't you just write 70-270 - winxp pro? Get ahead of the 'renewal'
> process.
>
Because winxp pro is not used in my company and it doesn't look like we'll
be adopting it any time soon. I'd rather prove my ability to administer an
OS we're currently using.
Besides, it looks like win2k and winxp are going to go hand-in-hand as far
as certifications go. That is, win2k won't be retired before winxp is.
B
| |
|
| ah, XP pro is w2k pro but with more bells and whistles. A lot of XP
principles are based on pro, so you get w2k pro stuff and the XP stuff in
one....
"Benjamin" <benjenn@attbi.com> wrote in message
news:rR4H9.349$Lb5.31268@news.uswest.net...
>
> "baglicker" <anus@myass.com> wrote in message
> news:k%3H9.29099$Qr.550055@news3.calgary.shaw.ca...
> > Why don't you just write 70-270 - winxp pro? Get ahead of the 'renewal'
> > process.
> >
> Because winxp pro is not used in my company and it doesn't look like we'll
> be adopting it any time soon. I'd rather prove my ability to administer
an
> OS we're currently using.
>
> Besides, it looks like win2k and winxp are going to go hand-in-hand as far
> as certifications go. That is, win2k won't be retired before winxp is.
>
> B
>
>
|
|
|
|
|