|
Home > Archive > alt.certification.network-plus > November 2002 > from hugo
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
|
|
| Hugo Amezaga 2002-11-16, 10:24 am |
| Who here knows why they cover issues like Mac(apple) and a few other OS's in
the Net+. I mean i am more of a Microsoft minded person. I been going
through Net+ on Sybex and also with Keystone, both of which i can send
through email or arrange a way for anyone to study with if you like. I just
feel that there should be certs for apple computers to get to know the
language besides Unix which is the reason behind apple. I did not pass the
NET+. i mean i knew the answers but they seem similar in many ways like
questions thrown at you can confuse you like " the order of this or that
questions".
You see i am not familar with Unix or other OS and i know that it is not
fair in my part. I would be certified granted, but i would prefer more input
on all OS topics and i feel that they should do it more specific. You can be
NET+ in other way in my opinion like if for example you get the MCSE. It
covers networking for Microsoft in general. It is easier since it sticks
with what we normally use daily. Microsoft is the leading software sold and
then MacOS.
Lets talk and be civil and we can share any positive ideas. I do not want
to give up. and dammit....this ritalin does not work anyhow..........hahaaha
| |
| steve harris 2002-11-16, 10:24 am |
| Hugo Amezaga wrote:
> Who here knows why they cover issues like Mac(apple) and a few other OS's
> in the Net+. I mean i am more of a Microsoft minded person. I been going
> through Net+ on Sybex and also with Keystone, both of which i can send
> through email or arrange a way for anyone to study with if you like. I
> just feel that there should be certs for apple computers to get to know
> the language besides Unix which is the reason behind apple. I did not pass
> the NET+. i mean i knew the answers but they seem similar in many ways
> like questions thrown at you can confuse you like " the order of this or
> that questions".
>
> You see i am not familar with Unix or other OS and i know that it is not
> fair in my part. I would be certified granted, but i would prefer more
> input on all OS topics and i feel that they should do it more specific.
> You can be NET+ in other way in my opinion like if for example you get the
> MCSE. It covers networking for Microsoft in general. It is easier since it
> sticks with what we normally use daily. Microsoft is the leading software
> sold and then MacOS.
>
> Lets talk and be civil and we can share any positive ideas. I do not want
> to give up. and dammit....this ritalin does not work
> anyhow..........hahaaha
Why start a new thread Hugo?
| |
| Hugo Amezaga 2002-11-16, 10:24 am |
| wows steve you are everywhere and what is wrong with a new thread?? are you
the moderator. i am being CIVIL and polite. i am just asking question as a
person that would anyday of this life.
"steve harris" < steveharris1@REMOVECAPShotmail
.com> wrote in message
news:ar5p3m$28sv$3@feed.centurytel.net...
> Hugo Amezaga wrote:
>
> > Who here knows why they cover issues like Mac(apple) and a few other
OS's
> > in the Net+. I mean i am more of a Microsoft minded person. I been going
> > through Net+ on Sybex and also with Keystone, both of which i can send
> > through email or arrange a way for anyone to study with if you like. I
> > just feel that there should be certs for apple computers to get to know
> > the language besides Unix which is the reason behind apple. I did not
pass
> > the NET+. i mean i knew the answers but they seem similar in many ways
> > like questions thrown at you can confuse you like " the order of this or
> > that questions".
> >
> > You see i am not familar with Unix or other OS and i know that it is not
> > fair in my part. I would be certified granted, but i would prefer more
> > input on all OS topics and i feel that they should do it more specific.
> > You can be NET+ in other way in my opinion like if for example you get
the
> > MCSE. It covers networking for Microsoft in general. It is easier since
it
> > sticks with what we normally use daily. Microsoft is the leading
software
> > sold and then MacOS.
> >
> > Lets talk and be civil and we can share any positive ideas. I do not
want
> > to give up. and dammit....this ritalin does not work
> > anyhow..........hahaaha
>
> Why start a new thread Hugo?
>
>
| |
| Slammer 2002-11-16, 11:24 am |
| Comptia Exams are vendor neutral, thats why you need to be well rounded.
Net+ is not solely based on Microsoft. You should become familiar with other
OS to expand your knowledge base. Maybe you were right in your other thread
that your in the wrong field.
--
Slammer
MCSA, CNA, NET+, A+
"Hugo Amezaga" <hugo123@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:txtB9.4003$%j3.1542@news.bellsouth.net...
> Who here knows why they cover issues like Mac(apple) and a few other OS's
in
> the Net+. I mean i am more of a Microsoft minded person. I been going
> through Net+ on Sybex and also with Keystone, both of which i can send
> through email or arrange a way for anyone to study with if you like. I
just
> feel that there should be certs for apple computers to get to know the
> language besides Unix which is the reason behind apple. I did not pass the
> NET+. i mean i knew the answers but they seem similar in many ways like
> questions thrown at you can confuse you like " the order of this or that
> questions".
>
> You see i am not familar with Unix or other OS and i know that it is not
> fair in my part. I would be certified granted, but i would prefer more
input
> on all OS topics and i feel that they should do it more specific. You can
be
> NET+ in other way in my opinion like if for example you get the MCSE. It
> covers networking for Microsoft in general. It is easier since it sticks
> with what we normally use daily. Microsoft is the leading software sold
and
> then MacOS.
>
> Lets talk and be civil and we can share any positive ideas. I do not want
> to give up. and dammit....this ritalin does not work
anyhow..........hahaaha
>
>
>
| |
| Paul Womar 2002-11-16, 12:24 pm |
| Hugo Amezaga <hugo123@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> Who here knows why they cover issues like Mac(apple) and a few other OS's in
> the Net+.
Because it is a vendor neutral certification.
> I mean i am more of a Microsoft minded person.
Then I'm sure Microsoft will happily sell you one of their
certifications.
--
-> The email address in this message *IS* Valid <-
| |
| Hugo Amezaga 2002-11-16, 1:24 pm |
| what was that for?? i know that microsoft sells their own!! but not their
own NET+ in general. i know that it is neutral, but what was that for ?
anything else
"Paul Womar" <{$PW$}@womar.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1flr631.4n5usi1iqr4v4N%{$PW$}@womar.co.uk...
> Hugo Amezaga <hugo123@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > Who here knows why they cover issues like Mac(apple) and a few other
OS's in
> > the Net+.
>
> Because it is a vendor neutral certification.
>
> > I mean i am more of a Microsoft minded person.
>
> Then I'm sure Microsoft will happily sell you one of their
> certifications.
> --
> -> The email address in this message *IS* Valid <-
| |
| Paul Womar 2002-11-16, 1:24 pm |
| Hugo Amezaga <hugo123@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> what was that for??
It was supposed to be an answer to your bizzarely worded question.
> i know that microsoft sells their own!! but not their
> own NET+ in general.
Weren't you complaining just a few moments ago that the Network+ *IS*
general and not sufficiently Windows-centric for your liking? Weren't
you saying that you believe the non-Microsoft items should be removed
from the Network+ and put into separate certifications? My point is
that you have a choice, if you want something Windows specific, go and
get something from Microsoft, if you want something that encompasses a
variety of different OSes as you'd most likely deal with in the real
world, then try the Network+.
--
-> The email address in this message *IS* Valid <-
| |
|
| Hugo
The reason they cover things like Linux, Mac and Novell in general is
because there many systems out in the world that run them. Looking on job
sites or in the paper most positions advertised ask for experience with
Citrix, Netware, Unix/Linux or Cisco as well as MS - in fact one position
advertised recently was for a completely non MS network.
--
RussS
A+, Net+, MCP Win 2K Pro, Win 2K Server
| |
| Hugo Amezaga 2002-11-16, 6:24 pm |
| why are you attacking me ? i mean even though i asked a question you tend
to be stern and exacting rather than mature and polite.
"Paul Womar" <{$PW$}@womar.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1flr73f.1ygg61bmtqyz6N%{$PW$}@womar.co.uk...
> Hugo Amezaga <hugo123@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > what was that for??
>
> It was supposed to be an answer to your bizzarely worded question.
>
> > i know that microsoft sells their own!! but not their
> > own NET+ in general.
>
> Weren't you complaining just a few moments ago that the Network+ *IS*
> general and not sufficiently Windows-centric for your liking? Weren't
> you saying that you believe the non-Microsoft items should be removed
> from the Network+ and put into separate certifications? My point is
> that you have a choice, if you want something Windows specific, go and
> get something from Microsoft, if you want something that encompasses a
> variety of different OSes as you'd most likely deal with in the real
> world, then try the Network+.
> --
> -> The email address in this message *IS* Valid <-
| |
| Hugo Amezaga 2002-11-16, 6:24 pm |
| that is very good, i understand, my question also would be if what you say
about job wise that would be a good way to ensure that we can and possibly
tackle the other OS requirements in due time by beginning with the
network+. like A+ and all, i do agree that introductory certifications that
generalize, do help decide what route we may want to go.
"RussS" <yeah_right@roflmao.com> wrote in message
news:%ZwB9.8545$8o1.1362318@news.xtra.co.nz...
> Hugo
>
> The reason they cover things like Linux, Mac and Novell in general is
> because there many systems out in the world that run them. Looking on job
> sites or in the paper most positions advertised ask for experience with
> Citrix, Netware, Unix/Linux or Cisco as well as MS - in fact one position
> advertised recently was for a completely non MS network.
>
> --
> RussS
> A+, Net+, MCP Win 2K Pro, Win 2K Server
>
>
| |
| Paul Womar 2002-11-16, 7:24 pm |
| Hugo Amezaga <hugo123@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> why are you attacking me ?
Why do you think I'm attacking you? I'm just pointing out that if
people are confused by what you write, it might be because your writing
lacks clarity, you might have perfectly good reasons like English not
being your native language or it might be something less valid, either
way, it's difficult for anyone to give you a decent answer until we
understand exactly what you are trying to say.
> i mean even though i asked a question you tend
> to be stern and exacting rather than mature and polite.
Like I mentioned, I don't find your posts particularly easy to
understand so I'm trying to find exactly what you are saying, I thought
I'd understood your original post and a few others seem to have read it
in the same way but you seem to think we've misunderstood. I'm not sure
that ignoring the questions and taking this so personally is helping us
come any closer to getting the answers.
--
-> The email address in this message *IS* Valid <-
| |
| Hugo Amezaga 2002-11-16, 7:24 pm |
| your still attacking me i made myself perfectly clear. not about grammar,
this is not english class, this is about humans talking about computers. i
do not worry so much about punctuality. just be normal and relax and offer
constructive comments and be aware as well that not everyone thinks like
you. don't speak for other and use them to include your comments against
petty things. and if i am petty or you want to use another form or tactic to
waste time to attack or use some form of judgemental ways then go right
ahead.
"Paul Womar" <{$PW$}@womar.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1flrnow.jfjilvkybc06N%{$PW$}@womar.co.uk...
> Hugo Amezaga <hugo123@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > why are you attacking me ?
>
> Why do you think I'm attacking you? I'm just pointing out that if
> people are confused by what you write, it might be because your writing
> lacks clarity, you might have perfectly good reasons like English not
> being your native language or it might be something less valid, either
> way, it's difficult for anyone to give you a decent answer until we
> understand exactly what you are trying to say.
>
> > i mean even though i asked a question you tend
> > to be stern and exacting rather than mature and polite.
>
> Like I mentioned, I don't find your posts particularly easy to
> understand so I'm trying to find exactly what you are saying, I thought
> I'd understood your original post and a few others seem to have read it
> in the same way but you seem to think we've misunderstood. I'm not sure
> that ignoring the questions and taking this so personally is helping us
> come any closer to getting the answers.
> --
> -> The email address in this message *IS* Valid <-
| |
| Phil Clark 2002-11-16, 8:24 pm |
| Paul and everyone else. Hugo is just begging for attention. Paul is
completely level headed in this response and Hugo chooses to make it into an
attack on him. I say that until he gets a thicker skin about this, he be
left alone. Since he seems to want to make an argument instead of have a
discussion.
"Hugo Amezaga" <hugo123@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:NABB9.13531$dr6.10957@news.bellsouth.net...
> your still attacking me i made myself perfectly clear. not about grammar,
> this is not english class, this is about humans talking about computers. i
> do not worry so much about punctuality. just be normal and relax and offer
> constructive comments and be aware as well that not everyone thinks like
> you. don't speak for other and use them to include your comments against
> petty things. and if i am petty or you want to use another form or tactic
to
> waste time to attack or use some form of judgemental ways then go right
> ahead.
> "Paul Womar" <{$PW$}@womar.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:1flrnow.jfjilvkybc06N%{$PW$}@womar.co.uk...
> > Hugo Amezaga <hugo123@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> >
> > > why are you attacking me ?
> >
> > Why do you think I'm attacking you? I'm just pointing out that if
> > people are confused by what you write, it might be because your writing
> > lacks clarity, you might have perfectly good reasons like English not
> > being your native language or it might be something less valid, either
> > way, it's difficult for anyone to give you a decent answer until we
> > understand exactly what you are trying to say.
> >
> > > i mean even though i asked a question you tend
> > > to be stern and exacting rather than mature and polite.
> >
> > Like I mentioned, I don't find your posts particularly easy to
> > understand so I'm trying to find exactly what you are saying, I thought
> > I'd understood your original post and a few others seem to have read it
> > in the same way but you seem to think we've misunderstood. I'm not sure
> > that ignoring the questions and taking this so personally is helping us
> > come any closer to getting the answers.
> > --
> > -> The email address in this message *IS* Valid <-
>
>
>
| |
| C Voyer 2002-11-16, 9:24 pm |
|
"Hugo Amezaga" <hugo123@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:txtB9.4003$%j3.1542@news.bellsouth.net...
> Who here knows why they cover issues like Mac(apple) and a few other OS's
in
> the Net+. I mean i am more of a Microsoft minded person. I been going
> through Net+ on Sybex and also with Keystone, both of which i can send
> through email or arrange a way for anyone to study with if you like. I
just
> feel that there should be certs for apple computers to get to know the
> language besides Unix which is the reason behind apple. I did not pass the
> NET+. i mean i knew the answers but they seem similar in many ways like
> questions thrown at you can confuse you like " the order of this or that
> questions".
>
> You see i am not familar with Unix or other OS and i know that it is not
> fair in my part. I would be certified granted, but i would prefer more
input
> on all OS topics and i feel that they should do it more specific. You can
be
> NET+ in other way in my opinion like if for example you get the MCSE. It
> covers networking for Microsoft in general. It is easier since it sticks
> with what we normally use daily. Microsoft is the leading software sold
and
> then MacOS.
>
> Lets talk and be civil and we can share any positive ideas. I do not want
> to give up. and dammit....this ritalin does not work
anyhow..........hahaaha
>
>
>
The test, I believe, is over general network knowledge. This involves Macs,
NT, Unix.......all platforms and Operating systems that one might encounter
while working in the field. It is best to be ready for whatever may come
your way.
| |
| C Voyer 2002-11-16, 10:24 pm |
|
"Hugo Amezaga" <hugo123@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:NABB9.13531$dr6.10957@news.bellsouth.net...
> your still attacking me i made myself perfectly clear. not about grammar,
> this is not english class, this is about humans talking about computers. i
> do not worry so much about punctuality.....
Hey...not being punctual could lose you a very good job. 
| |
|
| Hugo you're pretty much a mental midget nice to know you won't be taking any
computer related jobs from anyone in the near future.
Either study for the exams like everyone else or go back
to flippin burgers at micky D's
"Hugo Amezaga" <hugo123@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:txtB9.4003$%j3.1542@news.bellsouth.net...
> Who here knows why they cover issues like Mac(apple) and a few other OS's
in
> the Net+. I mean i am more of a Microsoft minded person. I been going
> through Net+ on Sybex and also with Keystone, both of which i can send
> through email or arrange a way for anyone to study with if you like. I
just
> feel that there should be certs for apple computers to get to know the
> language besides Unix which is the reason behind apple. I did not pass the
> NET+. i mean i knew the answers but they seem similar in many ways like
> questions thrown at you can confuse you like " the order of this or that
> questions".
>
> You see i am not familar with Unix or other OS and i know that it is not
> fair in my part. I would be certified granted, but i would prefer more
input
> on all OS topics and i feel that they should do it more specific. You can
be
> NET+ in other way in my opinion like if for example you get the MCSE. It
> covers networking for Microsoft in general. It is easier since it sticks
> with what we normally use daily. Microsoft is the leading software sold
and
> then MacOS.
>
> Lets talk and be civil and we can share any positive ideas. I do not want
> to give up. and dammit....this ritalin does not work
anyhow..........hahaaha
>
>
>
>
| |
| Paul Womar 2002-11-17, 8:24 am |
| Hugo Amezaga <hugo123@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> your still attacking me i made myself perfectly clear.
Unfortunately you didn't make yourself clear enough for me and you don't
seem to actually be atall interested in talking about the Network+ so
let's just leave it.
--
-> The email address in this message *IS* Valid <-
| |
|
| mental midget?? i do not flip burgers. you guys say i take things serious,
but it seems all i heard was critical talk. yes i do study, but i have said
once ......i have a busy schedule. well i need to head back anyhow to the
book.
by the way i do promote the keystones learning. they are great CDs. very
helpful. i will retake in one month.
"Mac" <mac@mace.net> wrote in message
news:93FB9.157152$fa.3268504@twister.tampabay.rr.com...
> Hugo you're pretty much a mental midget nice to know you won't be taking
any
> computer related jobs from anyone in the near future.
>
> Either study for the exams like everyone else or go back
> to flippin burgers at micky D's
>
>
>
> "Hugo Amezaga" <hugo123@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
> news:txtB9.4003$%j3.1542@news.bellsouth.net...
> > Who here knows why they cover issues like Mac(apple) and a few other
OS's
> in
> > the Net+. I mean i am more of a Microsoft minded person. I been going
> > through Net+ on Sybex and also with Keystone, both of which i can send
> > through email or arrange a way for anyone to study with if you like. I
> just
> > feel that there should be certs for apple computers to get to know the
> > language besides Unix which is the reason behind apple. I did not pass
the
> > NET+. i mean i knew the answers but they seem similar in many ways like
> > questions thrown at you can confuse you like " the order of this or that
> > questions".
> >
> > You see i am not familar with Unix or other OS and i know that it is not
> > fair in my part. I would be certified granted, but i would prefer more
> input
> > on all OS topics and i feel that they should do it more specific. You
can
> be
> > NET+ in other way in my opinion like if for example you get the MCSE. It
> > covers networking for Microsoft in general. It is easier since it sticks
> > with what we normally use daily. Microsoft is the leading software sold
> and
> > then MacOS.
> >
> > Lets talk and be civil and we can share any positive ideas. I do not
want
> > to give up. and dammit....this ritalin does not work
> anyhow..........hahaaha
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
| |
| >Pearl Jam 2002-11-22, 1:24 pm |
| Hey Hugo... sounds to me like you are very depressed cuz of your
unfortunate mishap of not passing your N+. But you still sound like
you are still "gun-ho" about it and dont plan to quit... thats good on
your part. I know it isnt easy knowing that 200 bux were blown cuz I
know that money dont come easy but what that should tell you is that
you should have been better prepared for it and I also think that you
will pass it next time around if u dont wait too long.
As for OS's... trust me when I tell you that becoming an MCSE you dont
only need to learn about MS OS's... but also NFS, MVS, Netware and
Linux, Mac's... and whatever else is out there that communicates in
the real world. The only one that MS dont cover as much is Banyan
Vines... but it does too come into the BIG picture as it happens to be
another NOS that's out there and in the real world and that as a
full-fledged MCSE, you will need to be prepared to work with all these
technologies.
So trust me when I tell you that becoming a MCSE isnt as easy as
people think. But it does take a lot of perseverance and dedication if
you really wanna meet your goals.
Just food for thought!
>PJ<
On Sat, 16 Nov 2002 10:36:49 -0500, "Hugo Amezaga"
<hugo123@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>Who here knows why they cover issues like Mac(apple) and a few other OS's in
>the Net+. I mean i am more of a Microsoft minded person. I been going
>through Net+ on Sybex and also with Keystone, both of which i can send
>through email or arrange a way for anyone to study with if you like. I just
>feel that there should be certs for apple computers to get to know the
>language besides Unix which is the reason behind apple. I did not pass the
>NET+. i mean i knew the answers but they seem similar in many ways like
>questions thrown at you can confuse you like " the order of this or that
>questions".
>
>You see i am not familar with Unix or other OS and i know that it is not
>fair in my part. I would be certified granted, but i would prefer more input
>on all OS topics and i feel that they should do it more specific. You can be
>NET+ in other way in my opinion like if for example you get the MCSE. It
>covers networking for Microsoft in general. It is easier since it sticks
>with what we normally use daily. Microsoft is the leading software sold and
>then MacOS.
>
>Lets talk and be civil and we can share any positive ideas. I do not want
>to give up. and dammit....this ritalin does not work anyhow..........hahaaha
| |
| >Pearl Jam 2002-11-22, 6:24 pm |
| Personally... I think he needs to get laid so that he can drown all of
his sorrows in one big gusher of a blast!!! LOL
>PJ<
On Sat, 16 Nov 2002 19:12:27 -0800, "Phil Clark"
<pclark45@charter.net> wrote:
>Paul and everyone else. Hugo is just begging for attention. Paul is
>completely level headed in this response and Hugo chooses to make it into an
>attack on him. I say that until he gets a thicker skin about this, he be
>left alone. Since he seems to want to make an argument instead of have a
>discussion.
>
>"Hugo Amezaga" <hugo123@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
>news:NABB9.13531$dr6.10957@news.bellsouth.net...
>> your still attacking me i made myself perfectly clear. not about grammar,
>> this is not english class, this is about humans talking about computers. i
>> do not worry so much about punctuality. just be normal and relax and offer
>> constructive comments and be aware as well that not everyone thinks like
>> you. don't speak for other and use them to include your comments against
>> petty things. and if i am petty or you want to use another form or tactic
>to
>> waste time to attack or use some form of judgemental ways then go right
>> ahead.
>> "Paul Womar" <{$PW$}@womar.co.uk> wrote in message
>> news:1flrnow.jfjilvkybc06N%{$PW$}@womar.co.uk...
>> > Hugo Amezaga <hugo123@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>> >
>> > > why are you attacking me ?
>> >
>> > Why do you think I'm attacking you? I'm just pointing out that if
>> > people are confused by what you write, it might be because your writing
>> > lacks clarity, you might have perfectly good reasons like English not
>> > being your native language or it might be something less valid, either
>> > way, it's difficult for anyone to give you a decent answer until we
>> > understand exactly what you are trying to say.
>> >
>> > > i mean even though i asked a question you tend
>> > > to be stern and exacting rather than mature and polite.
>> >
>> > Like I mentioned, I don't find your posts particularly easy to
>> > understand so I'm trying to find exactly what you are saying, I thought
>> > I'd understood your original post and a few others seem to have read it
>> > in the same way but you seem to think we've misunderstood. I'm not sure
>> > that ignoring the questions and taking this so personally is helping us
>> > come any closer to getting the answers.
>> > --
>> > -> The email address in this message *IS* Valid <-
>>
>>
>>
>
| |
| Jaxzone 2002-11-23, 9:24 pm |
| I wish u luck Hugo!
I will take my N+ test next week, let see how it is going to be!
Best!
"hugo" <hugo123@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:tT9D9.27337$%j3.25441@news.bellsouth.net...
> mental midget?? i do not flip burgers. you guys say i take things serious,
> but it seems all i heard was critical talk. yes i do study, but i have
said
> once ......i have a busy schedule. well i need to head back anyhow to the
> book.
>
> by the way i do promote the keystones learning. they are great CDs. very
> helpful. i will retake in one month.
> "Mac" <mac@mace.net> wrote in message
> news:93FB9.157152$fa.3268504@twister.tampabay.rr.com...
> > Hugo you're pretty much a mental midget nice to know you won't be taking
> any
> > computer related jobs from anyone in the near future.
> >
> > Either study for the exams like everyone else or go back
> > to flippin burgers at micky D's
> >
> >
> >
> > "Hugo Amezaga" <hugo123@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
> > news:txtB9.4003$%j3.1542@news.bellsouth.net...
> > > Who here knows why they cover issues like Mac(apple) and a few other
> OS's
> > in
> > > the Net+. I mean i am more of a Microsoft minded person. I been going
> > > through Net+ on Sybex and also with Keystone, both of which i can send
> > > through email or arrange a way for anyone to study with if you like. I
> > just
> > > feel that there should be certs for apple computers to get to know the
> > > language besides Unix which is the reason behind apple. I did not pass
> the
> > > NET+. i mean i knew the answers but they seem similar in many ways
like[
color=darkred]
> > > questions thrown at you can confuse you like " the order of this or[/color]
that[
color=darkred]
> > > questions".
> > >
> > > You see i am not familar with Unix or other OS and i know that it is[/color]
not[c
olor=darkred]
> > > fair in my part. I would be certified granted, but i would prefer more
> > input
> > > on all OS topics and i feel that they should do it more specific. You
> can
> > be
> > > NET+ in other way in my opinion like if for example you get the MCSE.[/color]
It[co
lor=darkred]
> > > covers networking for Microsoft in general. It is easier since it[/color]
sticks
> > > with what we normally use daily. Microsoft is the leading software
sold
> > and
> > > then MacOS.
> > >
> > > Lets talk and be civil and we can share any positive ideas. I do not
> want
> > > to give up. and dammit....this ritalin does not work
> > anyhow..........hahaaha
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
>
|
|
|
|
|