|
Home > Archive > alt.certification.network-plus > November 2002 > Active Directory Book Recommendation, please (Possibly OT)
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Active Directory Book Recommendation, please (Possibly OT)
|
|
| Lee Oliver 2002-10-12, 6:23 am |
| Hello. I'ts been a while since I last posted to this group. I've now got
my first job as an ICT Technician at a local school. I'm really enjoying
it, and learning a lot. Still haven't got the N+, though. I'll have a go
after Christmas.
Can anyone here recommend a good book for Win 2000 Active Directory? I'm
especially interested in managing user accounts, Group Policies, using .adm
files etc... Basically, all of AD. I'm having trouble finding my way
around the seemingly thousands of settings in the GP structure.
I'm currently reading Minasi's Mastering Windows 2000 Server, and can highly
recommend it. I'd like something in a similar style.
Thanks.
--
Lee Oliver
| |
| >Pearl Jam 2002-10-22, 7:24 pm |
| Lee,
I strongly recommend using and if finances permit, of course, the
Learnkey's Windows 2000 Directory Services Design and the Windows 2000
Directory Services Administration. The first one will prepare you for
the 70-219 and the latter for your 70-217 respectively... which is
what I used too.
But then again, you could probably find some other source that may not
cost as much as these two... for more info you can go to:
http://www.learnkey.com/store/welcome.cfm
Hope this helps!
Sincerely,
>PJ<
On Sat, 12 Oct 2002 12:28:52 +0100, "Lee Oliver"
<spam@SPAM.leeoliver.me.uk> wrote:
>Hello. I'ts been a while since I last posted to this group. I've now got
>my first job as an ICT Technician at a local school. I'm really enjoying
>it, and learning a lot. Still haven't got the N+, though. I'll have a go
>after Christmas.
>
>Can anyone here recommend a good book for Win 2000 Active Directory? I'm
>especially interested in managing user accounts, Group Policies, using .adm
>files etc... Basically, all of AD. I'm having trouble finding my way
>around the seemingly thousands of settings in the GP structure.
>
>I'm currently reading Minasi's Mastering Windows 2000 Server, and can highly
>recommend it. I'd like something in a similar style.
>
>Thanks.
| |
| Lee Oliver 2002-10-26, 10:24 am |
| Thanks again, Pearl Jam!
I'll have a look into these.
--
Lee Oliver
">Pearl Jam<" <PearlJamming@home.com> wrote in message
news:g83cruglle2f10t6a6gd5gt0q
tthfjie7f@4ax.com...
> Lee,
>
> I strongly recommend using and if finances permit, of course, the
> Learnkey's Windows 2000 Directory Services Design and the Windows 2000
> Directory Services Administration. The first one will prepare you for
> the 70-219 and the latter for your 70-217 respectively... which is
> what I used too.
>
> But then again, you could probably find some other source that may not
> cost as much as these two... for more info you can go to:
> http://www.learnkey.com/store/welcome.cfm
>
> Hope this helps!
>
> Sincerely,
>
>
> >PJ<
>
> On Sat, 12 Oct 2002 12:28:52 +0100, "Lee Oliver"
> <spam@SPAM.leeoliver.me.uk> wrote:
>
> >Hello. I'ts been a while since I last posted to this group. I've now
got
> >my first job as an ICT Technician at a local school. I'm really enjoying
> >it, and learning a lot. Still haven't got the N+, though. I'll have a
go
> >after Christmas.
> >
> >Can anyone here recommend a good book for Win 2000 Active Directory? I'm
> >especially interested in managing user accounts, Group Policies, using
..adm
> >files etc... Basically, all of AD. I'm having trouble finding my way
> >around the seemingly thousands of settings in the GP structure.
> >
> >I'm currently reading Minasi's Mastering Windows 2000 Server, and can
highly
> >recommend it. I'd like something in a similar style.
> >
> >Thanks.
>
| |
| >Pearl Jam 2002-11-06, 2:24 pm |
| No problemo! Anytime!
On Sat, 26 Oct 2002 15:53:04 +0100, "Lee Oliver"
<spam@SPAM.leeoliver.me.uk> wrote:
>Thanks again, Pearl Jam!
>
>I'll have a look into these.
|
|
|
|
|