| Author |
allt..certkiller.com got new exam updated compared to testking.co.uk
|
|
|
| allt..certkiller.com got new exam updated compared to testking.co.uk
this site is very good for all IT certifications.Material is real and
cheap than others.
| |
| Old Enough to Know Better 2004-01-04, 1:24 am |
|
"camry" <camry_don@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:591b41ed.0401030041.68fab554@posting.google.com...
> allt..certkiller.com got new exam updated compared to testking.co.uk
>
> this site is very good for all IT certifications.Material is real and
> cheap than others.
Such mastery of the written word !
| |
| =?Windows-1252?Q?Frisbee=AE_MCNGP?= 2004-01-05, 2:25 pm |
| Old Enough to Know Better wrote:
> "camry" <camry_don@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:591b41ed.0401030041.68fab554@posting.google.com...
>
> Such mastery of the written word !
He's the newest of the cobol, wongh, and camol brothers. He is certainly
more verbal.
--
Fris "Dewey, Screwum, & Howe" beeŽ MCNGP #13
http://www.mcngp.tk
The MCNGP Team - We're here to help
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/certaholics
Certaholics - We're here if you're beyond help
| |
| somegit 2004-01-06, 12:25 pm |
| On Mon, 5 Jan 2004 13:41:13 -0500, FrisbeeŽ MCNGP
<oncebitten@twiceshy.com> wrote:
>Old Enough to Know Better wrote:
>
>He's the newest of the cobol, wongh, and camol brothers. He is certainly
>more verbal.
I swatted like mad 70-210, tried to understand everything I was
learning and then used testkings questions to prepare for the exam.
Took it yesterday and passed. Wasn't too hard, what suprised me is the
amount of testkings questions that did actually come up in the exam.
Mr Caveman
| |
| Ken Briscoe 2004-01-06, 1:25 pm |
| > I swatted like mad 70-210, tried to understand everything I was
> learning and then used testkings questions to prepare for the exam.
> Took it yesterday and passed. Wasn't too hard, what suprised me is the
> amount of testkings questions that did actually come up in the exam.
>
You should be "swatted like mad". Cheating dumper. Why would it surprise
you that the testking questions come up on the test? They *are* the test
questions, XXX clown. Don't use dumps anymore, you're ruining the
certification for the rest of us.
--
KB
first inital last name AT hotmail DOT com
| |
| somegit 2004-01-08, 3:26 am |
| On Tue, 6 Jan 2004 12:18:48 -0500, "Ken Briscoe"
<youcant@sendmespam.com> wrote:
>You should be "swatted like mad". Cheating dumper. Why would it surprise
>you that the testking questions come up on the test? They *are* the test
>questions, XXX clown. Don't use dumps anymore, you're ruining the
>certification for the rest of us.
You don't even know why your last comment to me made you look such a
pratt do you!!
I've worked in IT ALL MY WORKING LIFE and at 35 I should reckon I know
what I am doing on a computer. I can also tell a bad engineer from a
good engineer and most of the bad ones I have worked with in the past
were MCP or MCSE qualified. The only reason I am taking these shitty
microshyte exams is in the UK you cannot get a reasonably paid job now
without them. Which makes no sense at all. I'd rather work with
someone who has experience rather than certifications. It's just the
shiny bummed pen pushers that seem to think they matter. The last
network admin I worked with was useless, he'd never done a testking
revision session in his life, he actually took he's mcse's at
college/university. The point I am trying to make is he was crap at
his job whether he used testking type tests or not! Also if they are
so bad for the industry how comes my class lecturer recommended the
testking papers?
To end my rant about useless wankers (such as yourself) who would
rather talk crap and be abusive than in the least bit helpful, why
don't you keep your half baked comments to yourself unless you have
anything worth being heard! testking rocks! but there is nothing that
equals to good old fashioned hands on experience.
somegit
| |
| HouseVod 2004-01-08, 10:25 am |
| Here here. I have also been in the trade for 15 years, I am seeking
certifications to prove I know what I know as my experience doesnt seem to
count with those 'shiny bummed pen pushers', they dont even seem to
interview you unless you got pretty certificates! So time to update and and
add. I would prefer to work along side a team with oodles of experience and
no certs, than a bunch of uni leavers with a lot of theory but no 'real
world' experience. I know what I know and if you ask me in an interview I
will tell you, if others lie saying they know it inside out cos they have
the cert, that is their princinples at question and the interviewers problem
for not checking or asking some 'theoretical problem/fix situations' to test
their knowledge.
That is also the end of my rant, back to my CCNA book now!
--
House
MCP, MCP+I, MCSE, A+, Network +
Dont e-mail me, I dont exist!
"somegit" <someone@somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:ei1qvvcan6qea7dsrrlq4j3uv
ol2r9hpu7@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 6 Jan 2004 12:18:48 -0500, "Ken Briscoe"
> <youcant@sendmespam.com> wrote:
>
>
> You don't even know why your last comment to me made you look such a
> pratt do you!!
>
> I've worked in IT ALL MY WORKING LIFE and at 35 I should reckon I know
> what I am doing on a computer. I can also tell a bad engineer from a
> good engineer and most of the bad ones I have worked with in the past
> were MCP or MCSE qualified. The only reason I am taking these shitty
> microshyte exams is in the UK you cannot get a reasonably paid job now
> without them. Which makes no sense at all. I'd rather work with
> someone who has experience rather than certifications. It's just the
> shiny bummed pen pushers that seem to think they matter. The last
> network admin I worked with was useless, he'd never done a testking
> revision session in his life, he actually took he's mcse's at
> college/university. The point I am trying to make is he was crap at
> his job whether he used testking type tests or not! Also if they are
> so bad for the industry how comes my class lecturer recommended the
> testking papers?
>
> To end my rant about useless wankers (such as yourself) who would
> rather talk crap and be abusive than in the least bit helpful, why
> don't you keep your half baked comments to yourself unless you have
> anything worth being heard! testking rocks! but there is nothing that
> equals to good old fashioned hands on experience.
>
> somegit
| |
| liyaqat_naz 2004-01-16, 2:58 pm |
| the best one | |
| mrraveltay 2004-01-17, 12:24 am |
|
camol wrote:
> allitcert.killer.com is the best one
>
Possibly the URL is invalid???
| |
|
|
|
|
| Eric75 2004-03-16, 8:12 am |
| Hello evrybody,
I'going to allt..certkiller.com but It doesn't work please give me the god adresse for certkiller site, thank you.
Eric | |
|
|
|
|
Can someone please send the newest allcert.killer PDF file for 640-861
CCDA file to me? Please people, I fail it 2 times, and I already study
the CCDA ciscopress by Anthony Bruno and Sybex 2nd edition, but I still
can not pass this exam. So, I beg you people send me the file to my
email address on unsw77@yahoo.com
Thank you people for ur kindness.
cobol wrote:
> *expert opinion
>
>
> cobol
> Sign up for free daily practice questions at: http://www.QoD.US
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Posted via http://www.examnotes.net
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> View this thread: http://www.examnotes.net/article1031925.html *
--
unome
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted via http://www.mcse.ms
------------------------------------------------------------------------
View this thread: http://www.mcse.ms/message239066.html
| |
| liyaqat_naz 2004-04-15, 5:25 am |
| last choice i had | |
| dexter14 2004-09-13, 10:45 am |
| does anybody know how certkiller version5.28-03 is?
...and is it any good? | |
| moderators 2004-12-07, 3:38 pm |
| the best | |
| moderators 2004-12-20, 12:12 am |
| new exam | |
| moderators 2005-03-21, 2:42 am |
| its the best | |
| moderators 2005-04-12, 9:44 am |
| found material best |
|
|
|