Home > Archive > alt.certification.cisco > February 2004 > RIP V1





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author RIP V1
sbab

2004-02-26, 5:25 pm

Hey everyone,
I have a router and am trying to get it to recieve updates from another
router using RIP V1. Its not working. When I do a debug I see the update
but the router reports that it ignored the update becuase of a bad address.
Any insights?


sbab

2004-02-26, 6:25 pm


"sbab" <news@babconet.net> wrote in message
news:k6ydnSv5b5x296PdRVn-sw@adelphia.com...
> Hey everyone,
> I have a router and am trying to get it to recieve updates from another
> router using RIP V1. Its not working. When I do a debug I see the

update
> but the router reports that it ignored the update becuase of a bad

address.
> Any insights?
>
>


I forgot to mention that I am trying to do this over ethernet and not a
serial connection. Is that possible?


smrkdown

2004-02-26, 9:11 pm

RIP updates are propogated out all active interfaces unless the passive-interface command is used. You probably have the ethernet interfaces attached to the same physical segment and have them configured on different logical networks. Try that with EIGRP and watch your terminal fill with error messages. If you have both interfaces attached together with a crossover-cable or into a switch or hub, I believe you'll have to have them on the same network (ex. 10.1.1.1, 10.1.1.2).
dood

2004-02-26, 10:25 pm

>or into a switch or hub, I
> believe you'll have to have them on the same network (ex. 10.1.1.1,
> 10.1.1.2).


I think that is the problem. I have them on the same physical switch stack,
except that one is 10.0.0.0 and the other is 172.16.0.0. I suspect that I
need to have the 172 eth int part of the 10 for rip to work properly. thank
you for the help!


Secret Squirrel

2004-02-27, 9:25 am

"dood" <news@babconet.com> wrote in
news:yfidnYJEXO5WNaPdRVn-uA@adelphia.com:

>
> I think that is the problem. I have them on the same physical switch
> stack, except that one is 10.0.0.0 and the other is 172.16.0.0. I
> suspect that I need to have the 172 eth int part of the 10 for rip to
> work properly. thank you for the help!
>
>
>


That is your problem. They will need to be in seperate switching segments.
If your switch supports vlans you can seperate them this way
Sponsored Links





Free Braindumps | MCSE braindumps software forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 examnotes.net