|
Home > Archive > alt.certification.cisco > September 2003 > Valid for CCNP?
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
|
|
|
| I've taken 640-901 (BSCI,routing)
and am taking 650-604 (switching) shortly
I've scheduled the remote access 640-605 but I'll probably have to take the
new support exam.(642-831) instead of the 640-606
This should still be adequate for CCNP?
thanks
| |
| X-Eliminator 2003-09-06, 6:28 pm |
| Yep.
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003 20:01:09 -0400, "SD"
<diesel7108@NOSPAM.sympatico.ca> wrote:
>I've taken 640-901 (BSCI,routing)
>and am taking 650-604 (switching) shortly
>I've scheduled the remote access 640-605 but I'll probably have to take the
>new support exam.(642-831) instead of the 640-606
>
>This should still be adequate for CCNP?
>
>thanks
>
| |
|
| thanks
"X-Eliminator" <blablabla@aohell.com> wrote in message
news:92mklvonh223jqvrfidtobi62
rgn53la36@4ax.com...
> Yep.
>
> On Thu, 4 Sep 2003 20:01:09 -0400, "SD"
> <diesel7108@NOSPAM.sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
> >I've taken 640-901 (BSCI,routing)
> >and am taking 650-604 (switching) shortly
> >I've scheduled the remote access 640-605 but I'll probably have to take
the
> >new support exam.(642-831) instead of the 640-606
> >
> >This should still be adequate for CCNP?
> >
> >thanks
> >
>
| |
| Lisa Duchovny 2003-09-08, 3:28 am |
| Hi,
This is good news. Inform us when you pass it. Wish you all the Luck for the exam!
"SD" <diesel7108@NOSPAM.sympatico.ca> wrote in message news:<7nQ6b.540$Nx6.100032@news20.bellglobal.com>...
> thanks
> "X-Eliminator" <blablabla@aohell.com> wrote in message
> news:92mklvonh223jqvrfidtobi62
rgn53la36@4ax.com...
> > Yep.
> >
> > On Thu, 4 Sep 2003 20:01:09 -0400, "SD"
> > <diesel7108@NOSPAM.sympatico.ca> wrote:
> >
> > >I've taken 640-901 (BSCI,routing)
> > >and am taking 650-604 (switching) shortly
> > >I've scheduled the remote access 640-605 but I'll probably have to take
> the
> > >new support exam.(642-831) instead of the 640-606
> > >
> > >This should still be adequate for CCNP?
> > >
> > >thanks
> > >
> >
|
|
|
|
|