|
Home > Archive > alt.certification.cisco > October 2003 > two T1s
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
|
|
|
| Hi all,
Are there any advantage or disadvantage if the two T1s are bonded (tied
together to look like a single 3.0Mbps line probably using IP unnumbered)
rather than load balanced with 2 separate IP addresses?
Thanks,
Al
| |
|
| I have found that MLPPP on a newer IOS and faster router is better
than per-packet load balancing with CEF (2 seperate IP's as you say)
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 13:45:59 GMT, "al" <allen@somplace.com> wrote:
>Hi all,
>Are there any advantage or disadvantage if the two T1s are bonded (tied
>together to look like a single 3.0Mbps line probably using IP unnumbered)
>rather than load balanced with 2 separate IP addresses?
>Thanks,
>Al
>
>
| |
| e-dub 2003-10-25, 12:25 am |
| Rob wrote:
>I have found that MLPPP on a newer IOS and faster router is better
>than per-packet load balancing with CEF (2 seperate IP's as you say)
>
>
>
>On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 13:45:59 GMT, "al" <allen@somplace.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>>Hi all,
>>Are there any advantage or disadvantage if the two T1s are bonded (tied
>>together to look like a single 3.0Mbps line probably using IP unnumbered)
>>rather than load balanced with 2 separate IP addresses?
>>Thanks,
>>Al
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
what's the setup for something like that? could someone post some configs?
|
|
|
|
|