| Author |
New CCIE written pass score
|
|
|
| I just read a message that the pass grade for the CCIE written dropped
to 58% or 87. It must have been hard, they even dropped below the 65% lower
limit they said would apply. Makes me respect my 106 score a lot more. I
was worried about that before.
Don
| |
| Jonathan 2002-09-27, 2:29 pm |
|
"Don" <seadon@attbi.com> wrote in message
news:7l1l9.13794$bX.1562@sccrnsc02...
> I just read a message that the pass grade for the CCIE written dropped
> to 58% or 87. It must have been hard, they even dropped below the 65%
lower
> limit they said would apply. Makes me respect my 106 score a lot more. I
> was worried about that before.
> Don
>
What is your source for this tidbit?
Jonathan
>
| |
|
| A posting on cciewritten@yahoogroups
.com
Don't know for firsthand if it's true, if that's what you mean.
Don
"Jonathan" <jrcdehc.nospam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:an29tj02tne@enews3.newsguy.com...
>
> "Don" <seadon@attbi.com> wrote in message
> news:7l1l9.13794$bX.1562@sccrnsc02...
> > I just read a message that the pass grade for the CCIE written
dropped
> > to 58% or 87. It must have been hard, they even dropped below the 65%
> lower
> > limit they said would apply. Makes me respect my 106 score a lot more.
I
> > was worried about that before.
> > Don
> >
>
> What is your source for this tidbit?
>
>
>
> Jonathan
>
> >
>
>
| |
| Jonathan 2002-09-27, 3:29 pm |
|
"Don" <seadon@attbi.com> wrote in message
news:7l1l9.13794$bX.1562@sccrnsc02...
> I just read a message that the pass grade for the CCIE written dropped
> to 58% or 87. It must have been hard, they even dropped below the 65%
lower
> limit they said would apply. Makes me respect my 106 score a lot more. I
> was worried about that before.
> Don
>
What is your source for this tidbit?
Jonathan
>
| |
|
| A posting on cciewritten@yahoogroups
.com
Don't know for firsthand if it's true, if that's what you mean.
Don
"Jonathan" <jrcdehc.nospam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:an29tj02tne@enews3.newsguy.com...
>
> "Don" <seadon@attbi.com> wrote in message
> news:7l1l9.13794$bX.1562@sccrnsc02...
> > I just read a message that the pass grade for the CCIE written
dropped
> > to 58% or 87. It must have been hard, they even dropped below the 65%
> lower
> > limit they said would apply. Makes me respect my 106 score a lot more.
I
> > was worried about that before.
> > Don
> >
>
> What is your source for this tidbit?
>
>
>
> Jonathan
>
> >
>
>
| |
| Clayton 2002-09-27, 3:29 pm |
| I'd be very interested to hear if this is really true.
"Don" <seadon@attbi.com> wrote in message
news:RC2l9.14413$bX.1542@sccrnsc02...
> A posting on cciewritten@yahoogroups
.com
> Don't know for firsthand if it's true, if that's what you mean.
> Don
>
> "Jonathan" <jrcdehc.nospam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:an29tj02tne@enews3.newsguy.com...
> >
> > "Don" <seadon@attbi.com> wrote in message
> > news:7l1l9.13794$bX.1562@sccrnsc02...
> > > I just read a message that the pass grade for the CCIE written
> dropped
> > > to 58% or 87. It must have been hard, they even dropped below the 65%
> > lower
> > > limit they said would apply. Makes me respect my 106 score a lot
more.
> I
> > > was worried about that before.
> > > Don
> > >
> >
> > What is your source for this tidbit?
> >
> >
> >
> > Jonathan
> >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
| |
| Bernie 2002-09-27, 3:29 pm |
| On Fri, 27 Sep 2002 13:59:10 -0500, "Jonathan"
<jrcdehc.nospam@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>"Don" <seadon@attbi.com> wrote in message
>news:7l1l9.13794$bX.1562@sccrnsc02...
>> I just read a message that the pass grade for the CCIE written dropped
>> to 58% or 87. It must have been hard, they even dropped below the 65%
>lower
>> limit they said would apply. Makes me respect my 106 score a lot more. I
>> was worried about that before.
>> Don
>>
>
>What is your source for this tidbit?
Assuming it is true, I am feeling like gloating over my prediction a
bit...
--Bernie
| |
| Clayton 2002-09-27, 4:29 pm |
| I'd be very interested to hear if this is really true.
"Don" <seadon@attbi.com> wrote in message
news:RC2l9.14413$bX.1542@sccrnsc02...
> A posting on cciewritten@yahoogroups
.com
> Don't know for firsthand if it's true, if that's what you mean.
> Don
>
> "Jonathan" <jrcdehc.nospam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:an29tj02tne@enews3.newsguy.com...
> >
> > "Don" <seadon@attbi.com> wrote in message
> > news:7l1l9.13794$bX.1562@sccrnsc02...
> > > I just read a message that the pass grade for the CCIE written
> dropped
> > > to 58% or 87. It must have been hard, they even dropped below the 65%
> > lower
> > > limit they said would apply. Makes me respect my 106 score a lot
more.
> I
> > > was worried about that before.
> > > Don
> > >
> >
> > What is your source for this tidbit?
> >
> >
> >
> > Jonathan
> >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
| |
| Bernie 2002-09-27, 4:29 pm |
| On Fri, 27 Sep 2002 13:59:10 -0500, "Jonathan"
<jrcdehc.nospam@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>"Don" <seadon@attbi.com> wrote in message
>news:7l1l9.13794$bX.1562@sccrnsc02...
>> I just read a message that the pass grade for the CCIE written dropped
>> to 58% or 87. It must have been hard, they even dropped below the 65%
>lower
>> limit they said would apply. Makes me respect my 106 score a lot more. I
>> was worried about that before.
>> Don
>>
>
>What is your source for this tidbit?
Assuming it is true, I am feeling like gloating over my prediction a
bit...
--Bernie
| |
| John Doe 2002-09-27, 5:29 pm |
| It is true
Derrell
"Clayton" <cknorr@rreativesolutions.com> wrote in message
news:an2f75$2vki$1@msunews.cl.msu.edu...
> I'd be very interested to hear if this is really true.
>
> "Don" <seadon@attbi.com> wrote in message
> news:RC2l9.14413$bX.1542@sccrnsc02...
> > A posting on cciewritten@yahoogroups
.com
> > Don't know for firsthand if it's true, if that's what you mean.
> > Don
> >
> > "Jonathan" <jrcdehc.nospam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:an29tj02tne@enews3.newsguy.com...
> > >
> > > "Don" <seadon@attbi.com> wrote in message
> > > news:7l1l9.13794$bX.1562@sccrnsc02...
> > > > I just read a message that the pass grade for the CCIE written
> > dropped
> > > > to 58% or 87. It must have been hard, they even dropped below the
65%[c
olor=darkred]
> > > lower
> > > > limit they said would apply. Makes me respect my 106 score a lot
> more.
> > I
> > > > was worried about that before.
> > > > Don
> > > >
> > >
> > > What is your source for this tidbit?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Jonathan
> > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>[/color]
| |
| SkyFoxXP 2002-09-28, 5:28 am |
| It seems to be a "distance vector" piece of news...
--
"Clayton" <cknorr@rreativesolutions.com> a écrit dans le message de news:
an2f75$2vki$1@msunews.cl.msu.edu...
> I'd be very interested to hear if this is really true.
| |
| SkyFoxXP 2002-09-28, 6:28 am |
| It seems to be a "distance vector" piece of news...
--
"Clayton" <cknorr@rreativesolutions.com> a écrit dans le message de news:
an2f75$2vki$1@msunews.cl.msu.edu...
> I'd be very interested to hear if this is really true.
|
|
|
|