| Author |
anyone passed 640-603?
|
|
| wayne hewetson 2002-07-23, 2:25 am |
| Hi; anyone completed the new routing exam? Big change from the 640-503?
| |
| Peter Rex Drescher 2002-07-23, 9:25 am |
| Prepare for a lot BGP and IS-IS
A lot of the trivia about address sub- and supernetting has been removed -
making ample space for quite good in-depth evaluation of your routing
skills.
As one of my colleagues said "There is a lot of everything".
Peter Rex Drescher
CCSI
"wayne hewetson" <whewetson@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:ce8500f7.0207222323.50ecc2ca@posting.google.com...
> Hi; anyone completed the new routing exam? Big change from the 640-503?
| |
|
| IS-IS???!!. I thought IS-IS was only in the 640-901 test and not 640-603
"Peter Rex Drescher" <peter@drescher.ws> wrote in message
news:3d3d7111$0$12686$edfadb0f
@dspool01.news.tele.dk...
> Prepare for a lot BGP and IS-IS
>
> A lot of the trivia about address sub- and supernetting has been removed -
> making ample space for quite good in-depth evaluation of your routing
> skills.
>
> As one of my colleagues said "There is a lot of everything".
>
> Peter Rex Drescher
> CCSI
>
> "wayne hewetson" <whewetson@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:ce8500f7.0207222323.50ecc2ca@posting.google.com...
> > Hi; anyone completed the new routing exam? Big change from the 640-503?
>
>
| |
| Peter Rex Drescher 2002-07-23, 3:25 pm |
| I' really sorry. I mistook it for the BSCI (Building Scalable Cisco
Internetworks) exam, which do contain IS-IS.
I regret to inform, that I don't have updated knowledge on the 640-603 exam.
Hope this saved some sweat on somebodys foreheads and armpits.
"Tony" <amunro@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:Qki%8.143$ND5.91056@e3500-atl2.usenetserver.com...
> IS-IS???!!. I thought IS-IS was only in the 640-901 test and not 640-603
> "Peter Rex Drescher" <peter@drescher.ws> wrote in message
> news:3d3d7111$0$12686$edfadb0f
@dspool01.news.tele.dk...
> > Prepare for a lot BGP and IS-IS
> >
> > A lot of the trivia about address sub- and supernetting has been
removed -
> > making ample space for quite good in-depth evaluation of your routing
> > skills.
> >
> > As one of my colleagues said "There is a lot of everything".
> >
> > Peter Rex Drescher
> > CCSI
> >
> > "wayne hewetson" <whewetson@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:ce8500f7.0207222323.50ecc2ca@posting.google.com...
> > > Hi; anyone completed the new routing exam? Big change from the
640-503?
> >
> >
>
>
>
| |
| wayne hewetson 2002-07-24, 12:25 am |
| Cisco does not mention IS-IS.OSPF and BGP are tough enough!!
"Tony" <amunro@bellsouth.net> wrote in message news:<Qki%8.143$ND5.91056@e3500-atl2.usenetserver.com>...
> IS-IS???!!. I thought IS-IS was only in the 640-901 test and not 640-603
> "Peter Rex Drescher" <peter@drescher.ws> wrote in message
> news:3d3d7111$0$12686$edfadb0f
@dspool01.news.tele.dk...
> > Prepare for a lot BGP and IS-IS
> >
> > A lot of the trivia about address sub- and supernetting has been removed -
> > making ample space for quite good in-depth evaluation of your routing
> > skills.
> >
> > As one of my colleagues said "There is a lot of everything".
> >
> > Peter Rex Drescher
> > CCSI
> >
> > "wayne hewetson" <whewetson@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:ce8500f7.0207222323.50ecc2ca@posting.google.com...
> > > Hi; anyone completed the new routing exam? Big change from the 640-503?
> >
> >
| |
|
| phew!! I have beem studying for the 640-603, and I did not see any IS-IS 
had me worried there for a split sec.
"Peter Rex Drescher" <peter@drescher.ws> wrote in message
news:3d3dc22d$0$26832$edfadb0f
@dspool01.news.tele.dk...
> I' really sorry. I mistook it for the BSCI (Building Scalable Cisco
> Internetworks) exam, which do contain IS-IS.
>
> I regret to inform, that I don't have updated knowledge on the 640-603
exam.
>
> Hope this saved some sweat on somebodys foreheads and armpits.
>
> "Tony" <amunro@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
> news:Qki%8.143$ND5.91056@e3500-atl2.usenetserver.com...
> > IS-IS???!!. I thought IS-IS was only in the 640-901 test and not 640-603
> > "Peter Rex Drescher" <peter@drescher.ws> wrote in message
> > news:3d3d7111$0$12686$edfadb0f
@dspool01.news.tele.dk...
> > > Prepare for a lot BGP and IS-IS
> > >
> > > A lot of the trivia about address sub- and supernetting has been
> removed -
> > > making ample space for quite good in-depth evaluation of your routing
> > > skills.
> > >
> > > As one of my colleagues said "There is a lot of everything".
> > >
> > > Peter Rex Drescher
> > > CCSI
> > >
> > > "wayne hewetson" <whewetson@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > > news:ce8500f7.0207222323.50ecc2ca@posting.google.com...
> > > > Hi; anyone completed the new routing exam? Big change from the
> 640-503?
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
| |
| alphaomegait 2002-07-25, 10:25 am |
| I passed it in the last few weeks. one sim and a lot of mutli guess.
The sim must count for a lot because I missed a lot of questions and
passed with a 710. I know I got the sim question right.
whewetson@hotmail.com (wayne hewetson) wrote in message news:<ce8500f7.0207232147.4a953364@posting.google.com>...
> Cisco does not mention IS-IS.OSPF and BGP are tough enough!!
>
> "Tony" <amunro@bellsouth.net> wrote in message news:<Qki%8.143$ND5.91056@e3500-atl2.usenetserver.com>...
> > IS-IS???!!. I thought IS-IS was only in the 640-901 test and not 640-603
> > "Peter Rex Drescher" <peter@drescher.ws> wrote in message
> > news:3d3d7111$0$12686$edfadb0f
@dspool01.news.tele.dk...
> > > Prepare for a lot BGP and IS-IS
> > >
> > > A lot of the trivia about address sub- and supernetting has been removed -
> > > making ample space for quite good in-depth evaluation of your routing
> > > skills.
> > >
> > > As one of my colleagues said "There is a lot of everything".
> > >
> > > Peter Rex Drescher
> > > CCSI
> > >
> > > "wayne hewetson" <whewetson@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > > news:ce8500f7.0207222323.50ecc2ca@posting.google.com...
> > > > Hi; anyone completed the new routing exam? Big change from the 640-503?
> > >
> > >
| |
| Suresh_Homepage 2002-07-27, 11:25 pm |
| As far as the simulatioins are concerned, know your OSPF like the back
of your hand. Must know how to enable ospf on interfaces alone. Get to
know how to enable ospf using 'more specific' wild card masks.
thanks
Suresh CNE,MCSE+I,CLS,CCSA,SCSA,SCNA,
CCNA,CCNP,CSS1,CCIE(w)
http://www.sureshhomepage.com
|
|
|
|