|
Home > Archive > alt.certification.cisco > December 2002 > hardest subnettign question possible for ccna
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
hardest subnettign question possible for ccna
|
|
|
| can someone who has done the exams, or someone who has done many exam and
has vast experience post me a subnetting question which u think would be the
hardest type for the ccna exam.
just want to make sure im ready
thanks
| |
| Ryan Goolevitch 2002-12-21, 4:24 am |
| Hmm... took the test today (and passed)
One I had fun with..
something like...
IP address 208.171.50.0 subnet mask 255.255.255.248
Which are valid host addresses?
209.172.50.16
209.172.50.97
209.172.50.139
209.171.50.160
notice the crappy wording.. their 'ip address' is a network address IMHO...
"a" <no@spam.co.uk> wrote in message
news:hiHM9.32318$306.29127@news-binary.blueyonder.co.uk...
> can someone who has done the exams, or someone who has done many exam and
> has vast experience post me a subnetting question which u think would be
the
> hardest type for the ccna exam.
>
> just want to make sure im ready
>
> thanks
>
>
>
>
| |
|
| am i correct in saying that
..97
..139
are the valid host addresses
"Ryan Goolevitch" <ryang@trideja.com> wrote in message
news:UAWM9.8831$xp4.333756@news1.telusplanet.net...
> Hmm... took the test today (and passed)
>
> One I had fun with..
>
> something like...
> IP address 208.171.50.0 subnet mask 255.255.255.248
>
> Which are valid host addresses?
>
> 209.172.50.16
> 209.172.50.97
> 209.172.50.139
> 209.171.50.160
>
> notice the crappy wording.. their 'ip address' is a network address
IMHO...
>
>
> "a" <no@spam.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:hiHM9.32318$306.29127@news-binary.blueyonder.co.uk...
> > can someone who has done the exams, or someone who has done many exam
and
> > has vast experience post me a subnetting question which u think would be
> the
> > hardest type for the ccna exam.
> >
> > just want to make sure im ready
> >
> > thanks
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
| |
| afropuff 2002-12-21, 3:25 pm |
| yup
"a" <no@spam.co.uk> wrote in message
news:hs%M9.39988$306.31796@news-binary.blueyonder.co.uk...
> am i correct in saying that
>
> .97
> .139
>
> are the valid host addresses
> "Ryan Goolevitch" <ryang@trideja.com> wrote in message
> news:UAWM9.8831$xp4.333756@news1.telusplanet.net...
> > Hmm... took the test today (and passed)
> >
> > One I had fun with..
> >
> > something like...
> > IP address 208.171.50.0 subnet mask 255.255.255.248
> >
> > Which are valid host addresses?
> >
> > 209.172.50.16
> > 209.172.50.97
> > 209.172.50.139
> > 209.171.50.160
> >
> > notice the crappy wording.. their 'ip address' is a network address
> IMHO...
> >
> >
> > "a" <no@spam.co.uk> wrote in message
> > news:hiHM9.32318$306.29127@news-binary.blueyonder.co.uk...
> > > can someone who has done the exams, or someone who has done many exam
> and
> > > has vast experience post me a subnetting question which u think would
be
> > the
> > > hardest type for the ccna exam.
> > >
> > > just want to make sure im ready
> > >
> > > thanks
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
| |
|
| The hardest subnetting question?
It would go something like this: Network 10.211.231.243.... find the
4,001,023rd subnet and it's broadcast address, (I'm not sure if those
are valid numbers, but you get the idea).
On Sat, 21 Dec 2002 09:34:44 GMT, "Ryan Goolevitch"
<ryang@trideja.com> wrote:
>Hmm... took the test today (and passed)
>
>One I had fun with..
>
>something like...
>IP address 208.171.50.0 subnet mask 255.255.255.248
>
>Which are valid host addresses?
>
>209.172.50.16
>209.172.50.97
>209.172.50.139
>209.171.50.160
>
>notice the crappy wording.. their 'ip address' is a network address IMHO...
>
>
>"a" <no@spam.co.uk> wrote in message
>news:hiHM9.32318$306.29127@news-binary.blueyonder.co.uk...
>> can someone who has done the exams, or someone who has done many exam and
>> has vast experience post me a subnetting question which u think would be
>the
>> hardest type for the ccna exam.
>>
>> just want to make sure im ready
>>
>> thanks
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
| |
|
| nope, you better learn to read a little better than that if you expect to
make any headway with the exam.
"afropuff" <bdtobey@charter.net> wrote in message
news:v09n0rd9l3sdf6@corp.supernews.com...
> yup
>
>
> "a" <no@spam.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:hs%M9.39988$306.31796@news-binary.blueyonder.co.uk...
> > am i correct in saying that
> >
> > .97
> > .139
> >
> > are the valid host addresses
> > "Ryan Goolevitch" <ryang@trideja.com> wrote in message
> > news:UAWM9.8831$xp4.333756@news1.telusplanet.net...
> > > Hmm... took the test today (and passed)
> > >
> > > One I had fun with..
> > >
> > > something like...
> > > IP address 208.171.50.0 subnet mask 255.255.255.248
> > >
> > > Which are valid host addresses?
> > >
> > > 209.172.50.16
> > > 209.172.50.97
> > > 209.172.50.139
> > > 209.171.50.160
> > >
> > > notice the crappy wording.. their 'ip address' is a network address
> > IMHO...
> > >
> > >
> > > "a" <no@spam.co.uk> wrote in message
> > > news:hiHM9.32318$306.29127@news-binary.blueyonder.co.uk...
> > > > can someone who has done the exams, or someone who has done many
exam
> > and
> > > > has vast experience post me a subnetting question which u think
would
> be
> > > the
> > > > hardest type for the ccna exam.
> > > >
> > > > just want to make sure im ready
> > > >
> > > > thanks
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
| |
|
| y was my answer wrong?
"bg" <zyzzx@thuntek.net> wrote in message
news:han90v4qc12bs4icmfim0a9rl
gbrln7gac@4ax.com...
> The hardest subnetting question?
>
> It would go something like this: Network 10.211.231.243.... find the
> 4,001,023rd subnet and it's broadcast address, (I'm not sure if those
> are valid numbers, but you get the idea).
>
>
> On Sat, 21 Dec 2002 09:34:44 GMT, "Ryan Goolevitch"
> <ryang@trideja.com> wrote:
>
> >Hmm... took the test today (and passed)
> >
> >One I had fun with..
> >
> >something like...
> >IP address 208.171.50.0 subnet mask 255.255.255.248
> >
> >Which are valid host addresses?
> >
> >209.172.50.16
> >209.172.50.97
> >209.172.50.139
> >209.171.50.160
> >
> >notice the crappy wording.. their 'ip address' is a network address
IMHO...
> >
> >
> >"a" <no@spam.co.uk> wrote in message
> >news:hiHM9.32318$306.29127@news-binary.blueyonder.co.uk...
> >> can someone who has done the exams, or someone who has done many exam
and[c
olor=darkred]
> >> has vast experience post me a subnetting question which u think would[/color]
be
> >the
> >> hardest type for the ccna exam.
> >>
> >> just want to make sure im ready
> >>
> >> thanks
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
| |
| Ryan Goolevitch 2002-12-21, 9:24 pm |
| Thats right, but if you look closer I realize I made some typos after I
posted it 
the 172's should have been 171's... anyhow.. the real question had me
writing on paper a lot hehe
"a" <no@spam.co.uk> wrote in message
news:hs%M9.39988$306.31796@news-binary.blueyonder.co.uk...
> am i correct in saying that
>
> .97
> .139
>
> are the valid host addresses
> "Ryan Goolevitch" <ryang@trideja.com> wrote in message
> news:UAWM9.8831$xp4.333756@news1.telusplanet.net...
> > Hmm... took the test today (and passed)
> >
> > One I had fun with..
> >
> > something like...
> > IP address 208.171.50.0 subnet mask 255.255.255.248
> >
> > Which are valid host addresses?
> >
> > 209.172.50.16
> > 209.172.50.97
> > 209.172.50.139
> > 209.171.50.160
> >
> > notice the crappy wording.. their 'ip address' is a network address
> IMHO...
> >
> >
> > "a" <no@spam.co.uk> wrote in message
> > news:hiHM9.32318$306.29127@news-binary.blueyonder.co.uk...
> > > can someone who has done the exams, or someone who has done many exam
> and
> > > has vast experience post me a subnetting question which u think would
be
> > the
> > > hardest type for the ccna exam.
> > >
> > > just want to make sure im ready
> > >
> > > thanks
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
| |
|
|
|
| A,
Given 208.171.50.0 255.255.255.248 -or- /29
Valid Hosts are 208.171.50.1 - 208.171.50.6
208.171.50.0 is the Subnet
208.171.50.7 is the Broadcast
Since all the host choices are in a different network/subnet (209.172.50),
the answer is none of the above.
Here are a couple of questions that roughly gauge your subnetting awareness:
1.) Given the 10.100.50/24 subnet and equally subdividing beginning with
10.100.50.0/27, are the following addresses subnetwork, broadcast or host?
10.100.50.39
10.100.50.62
10.100.50.95
10.100.50.129
10.100.50.160
10.100.50.223
10.100.50.243
2.) Given the 172.19/16 network and subnetting it equally with /28, are the
following addresses subnetwork, broadcast or host?
172.19.6.111
172.19.45.208
172.191.151.239
172.19.187.193
172.19.201.254
172.19.222.144
172.19.248.22
172.19.248.175
3.) Which user has more networks to utilize?
UserA:
10.50.50.128/26
10.80.64/22
10.149.192/24
UserB:
172.17.12/22
172.20.10/24
172.22.38.192/26
JD
"a" <no@spam.co.uk> wrote in message
news:GT5N9.1952$Oc4.1793@news-binary.blueyonder.co.uk...
> y was my answer wrong?
> "bg" <zyzzx@thuntek.net> wrote in message
> news:han90v4qc12bs4icmfim0a9rl
gbrln7gac@4ax.com...
> > The hardest subnetting question?
> >
> > It would go something like this: Network 10.211.231.243.... find the
> > 4,001,023rd subnet and it's broadcast address, (I'm not sure if those
> > are valid numbers, but you get the idea).
> >
> >
> > On Sat, 21 Dec 2002 09:34:44 GMT, "Ryan Goolevitch"
> > <ryang@trideja.com> wrote:
> >
> > >Hmm... took the test today (and passed)
> > >
> > >One I had fun with..
> > >
> > >something like...
> > >IP address 208.171.50.0 subnet mask 255.255.255.248
> > >
> > >Which are valid host addresses?
> > >
> > >209.172.50.16
> > >209.172.50.97
> > >209.172.50.139
> > >209.171.50.160
> > >
> > >notice the crappy wording.. their 'ip address' is a network address
> IMHO...
> > >
> > >
> > >"a" <no@spam.co.uk> wrote in message
> > >news:hiHM9.32318$306.29127@news-binary.blueyonder.co.uk...
> > >> can someone who has done the exams, or someone who has done many exam
> and
> > >> has vast experience post me a subnetting question which u think would
> be
> > >the
> > >> hardest type for the ccna exam.
> > >>
> > >> just want to make sure im ready
> > >>
> > >> thanks
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> >
>
>
| |
|
| Not too tricky, just look at the "bits" :
208 171 50 0
255 255 255 248
s s s s s h h h
16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Good subnet,
bad host.
97 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 Good subnet,
good host.
139 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 Good subnet,
good host.
160 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Good subnet, bad
host.
So, 97 and 139 are correct answers.
"JD" <johndoe@insightbb.com> wrote in message
news:Y9eN9.257603$pN3.20871@sccrnsc03...
> A,
>
> Given 208.171.50.0 255.255.255.248 -or- /29
> Valid Hosts are 208.171.50.1 - 208.171.50.6
> 208.171.50.0 is the Subnet
> 208.171.50.7 is the Broadcast
>
> Since all the host choices are in a different network/subnet (209.172.50),
> the answer is none of the above.
The question didn't ask for valid hosts on "this particular" subnet.
And besides, 'subnet zero' is not considered a legal subnet within
the CCNA set of studies.........
For NA purposes, 208.171.50.(1 thru 7) are illegal.
( even though NPs and everyone else in the world knows they are just
fine.... )
| |
| afropuff 2002-12-23, 3:24 am |
| Question is badly worded but you have to assume by the answers that are
giving, which do not include the answer "none of the above", that they are
looking for valid host addresses in the 208.171.50 network..
which would be .97 and .139
"JD" <johndoe@insightbb.com> wrote in message
news:Y9eN9.257603$pN3.20871@sccrnsc03...
> A,
>
> Given 208.171.50.0 255.255.255.248 -or- /29
> Valid Hosts are 208.171.50.1 - 208.171.50.6
> 208.171.50.0 is the Subnet
> 208.171.50.7 is the Broadcast
>
> Since all the host choices are in a different network/subnet (209.172.50),
> the answer is none of the above.
>
> Here are a couple of questions that roughly gauge your subnetting
awareness:
>
> 1.) Given the 10.100.50/24 subnet and equally subdividing beginning with
> 10.100.50.0/27, are the following addresses subnetwork, broadcast or host?
>
> 10.100.50.39
> 10.100.50.62
> 10.100.50.95
> 10.100.50.129
> 10.100.50.160
> 10.100.50.223
> 10.100.50.243
>
> 2.) Given the 172.19/16 network and subnetting it equally with /28, are
the
> following addresses subnetwork, broadcast or host?
>
> 172.19.6.111
> 172.19.45.208
> 172.191.151.239
> 172.19.187.193
> 172.19.201.254
> 172.19.222.144
> 172.19.248.22
> 172.19.248.175
>
> 3.) Which user has more networks to utilize?
>
> UserA:
> 10.50.50.128/26
> 10.80.64/22
> 10.149.192/24
>
> UserB:
> 172.17.12/22
> 172.20.10/24
> 172.22.38.192/26
>
> JD
> "a" <no@spam.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:GT5N9.1952$Oc4.1793@news-binary.blueyonder.co.uk...
> > y was my answer wrong?
> > "bg" <zyzzx@thuntek.net> wrote in message
> > news:han90v4qc12bs4icmfim0a9rl
gbrln7gac@4ax.com...
> > > The hardest subnetting question?
> > >
> > > It would go something like this: Network 10.211.231.243.... find the
> > > 4,001,023rd subnet and it's broadcast address, (I'm not sure if those
> > > are valid numbers, but you get the idea).
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, 21 Dec 2002 09:34:44 GMT, "Ryan Goolevitch"
> > > <ryang@trideja.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > >Hmm... took the test today (and passed)
> > > >
> > > >One I had fun with..
> > > >
> > > >something like...
> > > >IP address 208.171.50.0 subnet mask 255.255.255.248
> > > >
> > > >Which are valid host addresses?
> > > >
> > > >209.172.50.16
> > > >209.172.50.97
> > > >209.172.50.139
> > > >209.171.50.160
> > > >
> > > >notice the crappy wording.. their 'ip address' is a network address
> > IMHO...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >"a" <no@spam.co.uk> wrote in message
> > > >news:hiHM9.32318$306.29127@news-binary.blueyonder.co.uk...
> > > >> can someone who has done the exams, or someone who has done many
exam
> > and
> > > >> has vast experience post me a subnetting question which u think
would
> > be
> > > >the
> > > >> hardest type for the ccna exam.
> > > >>
> > > >> just want to make sure im ready
> > > >>
> > > >> thanks
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
|
|
|
|
|
