|
Home > Archive > microsoft.public.cert.mcdba > October 2003 > Training Kit Question
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Training Kit Question
|
|
| Question 2003-10-03, 1:25 pm |
| I'm studying for my MCDBA, and I'm using the SQL Server
2000 System Administration Training Kit 2nd Edition. The
answer to question 1 of page 71 of the book, states that
SQL Server 2000 could not be installed on the machine
described (within the question), if it were running any
version of NT 4.0 Server Edition since 96MB of memory was
insufficient. However, page 36 shows that all versions
except for the Enterprise version could be installed on
such a machine running NT 4.0 Server Edition.
Can someone look at this and tell me if I'm mis-reading
the chart?
Thanks.
| |
| EVELYN 2003-10-03, 9:23 pm |
| In my book, the answer is correct and match the chart.
"This laptop does not have enough memory to properly test any SQL Server 2000 edition on any Windows 2000 Server edition. It DOES HAVE SUFFICIENT memory to test any SQL Server 2000 edition on any Windows NT 4.0 Server edition".
Hence, it seems correct.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Evelyn
"Question" <nomail@nomail.nomail> wrote in message news:1f44e01c389cd$f69d70c0$a6
01280a@phx.gbl...
I'm studying for my MCDBA, and I'm using the SQL Server
2000 System Administration Training Kit 2nd Edition. The
answer to question 1 of page 71 of the book, states that
SQL Server 2000 could not be installed on the machine
described (within the question), if it were running any
version of NT 4.0 Server Edition since 96MB of memory was
insufficient. However, page 36 shows that all versions
except for the Enterprise version could be installed on
such a machine running NT 4.0 Server Edition.
Can someone look at this and tell me if I'm mis-reading
the chart?
Thanks.
| |
| Question 2003-10-05, 12:24 pm |
| Thanks. I think that I misread the answer.
>-----Original Message-----
>In my book, the answer is correct and match the chart.
>
>"This laptop does not have enough memory to properly test
any SQL Server 2000 edition on any Windows 2000 Server
edition. It DOES HAVE SUFFICIENT memory to test any SQL
Server 2000 edition on any Windows NT 4.0 Server edition".
>
>Hence, it seems correct.
>
>----------------------------------------------------------
----------------------
>
>Evelyn
>
> "Question" <nomail@nomail.nomail> wrote in message
news:1f44e01c389cd$f69d70c0$a6
01280a@phx.gbl...
> I'm studying for my MCDBA, and I'm using the SQL Server
> 2000 System Administration Training Kit 2nd Edition.
The
> answer to question 1 of page 71 of the book, states
that
> SQL Server 2000 could not be installed on the machine
> described (within the question), if it were running any
> version of NT 4.0 Server Edition since 96MB of memory
was
> insufficient. However, page 36 shows that all versions
> except for the Enterprise version could be installed on
> such a machine running NT 4.0 Server Edition.
>
> Can someone look at this and tell me if I'm mis-reading
> the chart?
> Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|