|
Home > Archive > microsoft.public.cert.mcdba > June 2002 > Re: 228 or 229 (Which is Tougher)
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Re: 228 or 229 (Which is Tougher)
|
|
| Ricardo S. N. da Solidade 2002-06-23, 6:14 am |
| I think that 229 is thougher.
Ricardo S.
MC*.* (I hope)
"Mike" <mkeller1@bellatlantic.net> wrote in message news:<O78wlkSzBHA.2292@tkmsftngp07>...
> I have recently taken and passed both and I agree 229 is the tougher of the
> two with many many questions having exhibits and often two exhibits. Also
> had a lot of scrolling to do just to read all of the parts of a question
> "Mah - Dee" <Mah_-_De
>
> e@spiceworld.com> wrote in message
> news:xCDZ7.58768$4x4.8321787@news2-win.server.ntlworld.com...
> > it sure is!
> > "Lincoln Bovee'" <lbovee@flexsol.com> wrote in message
> > news:OAjvbTWlBHA.1948@tkmsftngp03...
> > > 229 is tougher. Trust me...
> > >
> > > --
> > > Lincoln Bovee'
> > > MCP, MCSD, almost MCDBA
> > > lincolnbovee@hotmail.com
> > >
> > >
> > > "Bob" <msnews.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> > > news:epq1BVTlBHA.956@tkmsftngp05...
> > > > Which is a tougher exam, 70-228 or 70-229?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
| |
| Mah - Dee 2002-06-23, 6:14 am |
| 228 is hard and practical
229 is hard and theoretical
in my view 229 was WAY harder
#
On 28 Mar 2002 12:50:01 -0800, rsolidade@hotmail.com (Ricardo S. N. da
Solidade) wrote:
>I think that 229 is thougher.
>
>Ricardo S.
>MC*.* (I hope)
>
>
>"Mike" <mkeller1@bellatlantic.net> wrote in message news:<O78wlkSzBHA.2292@tkmsftngp07>...
>> I have recently taken and passed both and I agree 229 is the tougher of the
>> two with many many questions having exhibits and often two exhibits. Also
>> had a lot of scrolling to do just to read all of the parts of a question
>> "Mah - Dee" <Mah_-_De
>>
>> e@spiceworld.com> wrote in message
>> news:xCDZ7.58768$4x4.8321787@news2-win.server.ntlworld.com...
>> > it sure is!
>> > "Lincoln Bovee'" <lbovee@flexsol.com> wrote in message
>> > news:OAjvbTWlBHA.1948@tkmsftngp03...
>> > > 229 is tougher. Trust me...
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Lincoln Bovee'
>> > > MCP, MCSD, almost MCDBA
>> > > lincolnbovee@hotmail.com
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > "Bob" <msnews.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> > > news:epq1BVTlBHA.956@tkmsftngp05...
>> > > > Which is a tougher exam, 70-228 or 70-229?
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
| |
| Lincoln Bovee' 2002-06-23, 6:14 am |
| That is the perfect accessment of the 2. I had a much higher score on 228
than 229 and I use SQL server all day long...
--
Lincoln Bovee'
MCSD, MCDBA
lincolnbovee@hotmail.com
"Mah - Dee" <ma-dee@spiceeworld.com> wrote in message
news:mdh8auo42n71ohdfjon7j6ki8
8nn87os2g@4ax.com...
> 228 is hard and practical
> 229 is hard and theoretical
> in my view 229 was WAY harder
>
> #
> On 28 Mar 2002 12:50:01 -0800, rsolidade@hotmail.com (Ricardo S. N. da
> Solidade) wrote:
>
> >I think that 229 is thougher.
> >
> >Ricardo S.
> >MC*.* (I hope)
> >
> >
> >"Mike" <mkeller1@bellatlantic.net> wrote in message
news:<O78wlkSzBHA.2292@tkmsftngp07>... [colo
r=darkred]
> >> I have recently taken and passed both and I agree 229 is the tougher of[/color]
the[c
olor=darkred]
> >> two with many many questions having exhibits and often two exhibits.[/color]
Also[
color=darkred]
> >> had a lot of scrolling to do just to read all of the parts of a[/color]
question
> >> "Mah - Dee" <Mah_-_De
> >>
> >> e@spiceworld.com> wrote in message
> >> news:xCDZ7.58768$4x4.8321787@news2-win.server.ntlworld.com...
> >> > it sure is!
> >> > "Lincoln Bovee'" <lbovee@flexsol.com> wrote in message
> >> > news:OAjvbTWlBHA.1948@tkmsftngp03...
> >> > > 229 is tougher. Trust me...
> >> > >
> >> > > --
> >> > > Lincoln Bovee'
> >> > > MCP, MCSD, almost MCDBA
> >> > > lincolnbovee@hotmail.com
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > "Bob" <msnews.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> >> > > news:epq1BVTlBHA.956@tkmsftngp05...
> >> > > > Which is a tougher exam, 70-228 or 70-229?
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
>
| |
| Mah - Dee 2002-06-23, 6:14 am |
| Have you seen the transcript tool on microsoft.com/traincert ?
my double cert (7+2K) only showed up as one entry !
On Fri, 29 Mar 2002 08:32:34 -0600, "Lincoln Bovee'"
<lincolnbovee@hotmail.com> wrote:
>That is the perfect accessment of the 2. I had a much higher score on 228
>than 229 and I use SQL server all day long...
| |
| Lincoln Bovee' 2002-06-23, 6:14 am |
| Mine only shows the SQL2000. I never tested on 7 so I can't verify this...
The format does look a little more professional though...in my opinion...
--
Lincoln Bovee'
MCSD, MCDBA
lincolnbovee@hotmail.com
"Mah - Dee" <ma-dee@spiceeworld.com> wrote in message
news:37lbausr51q6krk7jiqhe6vlj
qso0vkfdg@4ax.com...
> Have you seen the transcript tool on microsoft.com/traincert ?
> my double cert (7+2K) only showed up as one entry !
>
>
> On Fri, 29 Mar 2002 08:32:34 -0600, "Lincoln Bovee'"
> <lincolnbovee@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >That is the perfect accessment of the 2. I had a much higher score on 228
> >than 229 and I use SQL server all day long...
>
|
|
|
|
|