|
Home > Archive > alt.certification.a-plus > August 2003 > Read this: new Loser worm
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Read this: new Loser worm
|
|
| Pikoro 2003-08-24, 11:25 am |
| You are right here, dimwits, you couldn't stand an intellectual challenge
with me, and I'll tell you exactly why.
I am writing this post for the benefit of my colleagues in this
certification newsgroup, not obviously for you, because somebody who refuses
to acknowledge proof is a hopeless lunatic.
Supposing I were working on an associate's certification degree, would that
mean the end of the echelon?
NO, it would mean an automatic transfer to a 4-years institution, then to a
Bachelor, Master or PhD. Thus, in essence I would be working on an advanced
degree using the 2-years program as a launchpad.
Your crappy suggestion to go directly into a 4-years program is wrong simply
because for a certified tech. it is easier to get started on a 4-years
program by substituting his acquired certs. for classes in a community
college (re. my previous list).
Conversely, if I approved certain classes in a community college, I would
have all the training required to pass the certification tests, since the
classes are strictly based on the certs. curricula.
Therefore, at the end of my career I would have an advanced degree +
certifications, if you add experience to the mix then you have a proven
formula to land a job in IT.
Thousands of ads PROVE you wrong, anybody knows that degrees + certs. is the
best way to go and if you don't then you would be the only hiring manager in
the world to stand apart from this proven path, but there is a reason for
this, which I will explain below.
Now, for my colleagues that are still in doubt about this matter I will add
further proof to my already proven statements.
The following State-approved classes are offered in one of the top ten
community colleges in the nation and imply an AUTOMATIC transfer to
technical universities, who even offer scholarships to students that pass
them.
Microsoft MCSE Associate in Science Major Code 21931
Microsoft MCSE Associate in Applied Science Major Code A019
Microsoft MCSE Technical Certificate Major Code 62384
Networking-Novell CNE Associate of Science Major Code 21932
Networking-Novell CNE Associate of Applied Science Major Code A020
Novell CNE Technical Certificate Major Code 62383
Cisco CCNP Program Associate in Science Major Code 21933
Networking-Cisco CCNA Technical Certificate Major Code 62387
Others are in the pipeline.
This *IS* the real world, miserable clown, not your hocus-pocus of
experience-based points.
It is true that you cannot stand an intellectual challenge with me simply
because I can PROVE you wrong and you cannot come with an ounce of proof to
back your statements.
This is simple: I say that certifications are being integrated into higher
education, you say no.
I submit proof "ad nauseam", you submit meaningless lunatic rants like "I
think it's neat how this genius conveniently skips over all of the valid
points we make and only responds to the most miniscule (shouldn't it be '
minuscule', Brainiac?) facets of our arguments, encapsulated in a peon
temper-tantrum cursory because he isn't getting his way and can't make a
logical case
against our points."
What is your logic? Where are your arguments? Bring 'em on!
I solemnly promise that if you can prove only one flaw in my logic and
arguments I will admit that you have proved me wrong. This is the
intellectual challenge you will never be up to, XXXXX.
The only proof you have submitted so far is Mme. Butterfly giggling like a
schoolgirl at your ridiculous gibberish, because she hopes that somehow she
will now be able to bash Pikoro.
The game is over, freak, I know that you don't have balls enough to admit
that you have been proved wrong, you could at least have the minimal decency
to shut up.
But hold on, people, there is more.
This punk is the same one that some months ago reinvented the wheel and told
everybody that he was about to revolutionize the way we do business with his
experience-based points. He was even recruiting authors for his new venture,
a website/dotcom that has now disappeared.
Therein this pathetic clown had a complicated table that showed how certs.
compared with degrees and how employers would trust more his
experience-based certifications than those offered by such negligeable
entities as CompTIA, Microsoft, Cisco, etc.
This is the reason why this lunatic does not agree that certifications are
being integrated into higher education, alas! outside his own personal
scheme.
And then this imbecile has the nerve to say that what I write is
speculation.
I have gone through what your "guesses/assertions" about me are, you weren't
even close, XXXXXXX, and you never will be, but I can PROVE the following:
Clint Kennedy is a hopeless lunatic, a failed scam artist, a thief and a
liar.
You didn't find any authors to help in the success of your dotcom, you
didn't hire anybody for your commission-based work, Mr. Hiring Manager,
because people were smart enough to realize who you are.
Maybe you could try as clown hiring manager and hire Mme. Butterfly?
"Clint Kennedy" <clint_kennedy@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:jaH1b.16237$cj1.4200@fed1read06...
> I couldn't stand an intellectual challenge with you? Right. I bow down
to
> your complete genius. If only I could be as reasonable and logical as you
> are. Go get that associate's certification-based degree and show the
world
> who's boss!!!
>
> - Clint
| |
| DullRazor 2003-08-24, 1:26 pm |
| I'm not sure what this thread is all about but one thing I will add is
this; A college degree, whether it is an associate degree(2 years) or
bachular degree(4 years) is better than having JUST a certification. I
have an associate degree plus an a+ cert. I graduated about 5 weeks
ago and have not found a job yet but I will continue to look. I have
had a couple of job interviews but for whatever the reason was not
hired. One thing is for certain tho, I would not have gotten those
interviews if I had not had my degree. I think in todays job market a
cert is not enough. Oh sure, you can point to a few people that have
landed great jobs without a degree but for the average,
run-of-the-mill person, they need that degree. And if they have earned
the associate degree then they should go on and get the four year
degree. It looks much better on a job resume.
On Sun, 24 Aug 2003 11:20:26 -0400, "Pikoro" <pikoro@comcast.net>
wrote:
>You are right here, dimwits, you couldn't stand an intellectual challenge
>with me, and I'll tell you exactly why.
>I am writing this post for the benefit of my colleagues in this
>certification newsgroup, not obviously for you, because somebody who refuses
>to acknowledge proof is a hopeless lunatic.
>Supposing I were working on an associate's certification degree, would that
>mean the end of the echelon?
>NO, it would mean an automatic transfer to a 4-years institution, then to a
>Bachelor, Master or PhD. Thus, in essence I would be working on an advanced
>degree using the 2-years program as a launchpad.
>Your crappy suggestion to go directly into a 4-years program is wrong simply
>because for a certified tech. it is easier to get started on a 4-years
>program by substituting his acquired certs. for classes in a community
>college (re. my previous list).
>Conversely, if I approved certain classes in a community college, I would
>have all the training required to pass the certification tests, since the
>classes are strictly based on the certs. curricula.
>Therefore, at the end of my career I would have an advanced degree +
>certifications, if you add experience to the mix then you have a proven
>formula to land a job in IT.
>Thousands of ads PROVE you wrong, anybody knows that degrees + certs. is the
>best way to go and if you don't then you would be the only hiring manager in
>the world to stand apart from this proven path, but there is a reason for
>this, which I will explain below.
>Now, for my colleagues that are still in doubt about this matter I will add
>further proof to my already proven statements.
>The following State-approved classes are offered in one of the top ten
>community colleges in the nation and imply an AUTOMATIC transfer to
>technical universities, who even offer scholarships to students that pass
>them.
>Microsoft MCSE Associate in Science Major Code 21931
>Microsoft MCSE Associate in Applied Science Major Code A019
>Microsoft MCSE Technical Certificate Major Code 62384
>Networking-Novell CNE Associate of Science Major Code 21932
>Networking-Novell CNE Associate of Applied Science Major Code A020
>Novell CNE Technical Certificate Major Code 62383
>Cisco CCNP Program Associate in Science Major Code 21933
>Networking-Cisco CCNA Technical Certificate Major Code 62387
>Others are in the pipeline.
>This *IS* the real world, miserable clown, not your hocus-pocus of
>experience-based points.
>It is true that you cannot stand an intellectual challenge with me simply
>because I can PROVE you wrong and you cannot come with an ounce of proof to
>back your statements.
>This is simple: I say that certifications are being integrated into higher
>education, you say no.
>I submit proof "ad nauseam", you submit meaningless lunatic rants like "I
>think it's neat how this genius conveniently skips over all of the valid
>points we make and only responds to the most miniscule (shouldn't it be '
>minuscule', Brainiac?) facets of our arguments, encapsulated in a peon
>temper-tantrum cursory because he isn't getting his way and can't make a
>logical case
>against our points."
>What is your logic? Where are your arguments? Bring 'em on!
>I solemnly promise that if you can prove only one flaw in my logic and
>arguments I will admit that you have proved me wrong. This is the
>intellectual challenge you will never be up to, XXXXX.
>The only proof you have submitted so far is Mme. Butterfly giggling like a
>schoolgirl at your ridiculous gibberish, because she hopes that somehow she
>will now be able to bash Pikoro.
>The game is over, freak, I know that you don't have balls enough to admit
>that you have been proved wrong, you could at least have the minimal decency
>to shut up.
>
>But hold on, people, there is more.
>This punk is the same one that some months ago reinvented the wheel and told
>everybody that he was about to revolutionize the way we do business with his
>experience-based points. He was even recruiting authors for his new venture,
>a website/dotcom that has now disappeared.
>Therein this pathetic clown had a complicated table that showed how certs.
>compared with degrees and how employers would trust more his
>experience-based certifications than those offered by such negligeable
>entities as CompTIA, Microsoft, Cisco, etc.
>This is the reason why this lunatic does not agree that certifications are
>being integrated into higher education, alas! outside his own personal
>scheme.
>And then this imbecile has the nerve to say that what I write is
>speculation.
>I have gone through what your "guesses/assertions" about me are, you weren't
>even close, XXXXXXX, and you never will be, but I can PROVE the following:
>Clint Kennedy is a hopeless lunatic, a failed scam artist, a thief and a
>liar.
>You didn't find any authors to help in the success of your dotcom, you
>didn't hire anybody for your commission-based work, Mr. Hiring Manager,
>because people were smart enough to realize who you are.
>Maybe you could try as clown hiring manager and hire Mme. Butterfly?
>
>
>"Clint Kennedy" <clint_kennedy@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:jaH1b.16237$cj1.4200@fed1read06...
>> I couldn't stand an intellectual challenge with you? Right. I bow down
>to
>> your complete genius. If only I could be as reasonable and logical as you
>> are. Go get that associate's certification-based degree and show the
>world
>> who's boss!!!
>>
>> - Clint
>
| |
| Clint Kennedy 2003-08-24, 7:25 pm |
| "This punk is the same one that some months ago reinvented the wheel and
told
everybody that he was about to revolutionize the way we do business with his
experience-based points. He was even recruiting authors for his new venture,
a website/dotcom that has now disappeared."
I wish I knew what you were referring to. I first visited this newsgroup 3
weeks ago, have never perused a website/dotcom venture in my life, and have
never tried to recruit authors for any purpose. You should have your memory
checked (in fact, I'd recommend a complete evalutation of your psyche
considering you are obviously in your own false world that you seem to have
mastered).
The more you talk, the more ignorant you look. I wonder who you think you
are impressing? How about this, for all of those people that Pikoro is
impressing, respond and say so. I'm going to ignore you from now on, feel
free to keep your lunatic rantings going. Good luck in the real world,
you've yet to tell us what you do for a living.
Clint
| |
|
| Clint
I think he is like a 12yr old kid. Not sure, but what I am sure of is that
he has a serious attitude problem .... lol
| |
| R.A.D. 2003-08-24, 9:25 pm |
| The thing is even if he is 12 you guys are acting his age and disrupting an
informative NG. The best thing to do is don't feed the Trolls. You will
probably Flame me for this,but that will only give you Troll status as well.
Regards R.A.D.
"RussS" <yeah_right@roflmao.com> wrote in message
news:T5c2b.126097$JA5.2929585@news.xtra.co.nz...
> Clint
>
> I think he is like a 12yr old kid. Not sure, but what I am sure of is
that
> he has a serious attitude problem .... lol
>
>
| |
| Pikoro 2003-08-24, 10:26 pm |
| This is irrelevant, I don't really care who you are and nobody does.
Just bring proof of your position and demonstrate that my arguments are
wrong, just as I have demolished yours, if you can.
As I said, the game is over, freak, no stupid rants will make you win this
one, only proof.
"Clint Kennedy" <clint_kennedy@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:m8b2b.18463$cj1.1454@fed1read06...
> "This punk is the same one that some months ago reinvented the wheel and
> told
> everybody that he was about to revolutionize the way we do business with
his
> experience-based points. He was even recruiting authors for his new
venture,
> a website/dotcom that has now disappeared."
>
> I wish I knew what you were referring to. I first visited this newsgroup
3
> weeks ago, have never perused a website/dotcom venture in my life, and
have
> never tried to recruit authors for any purpose. You should have your
memory
> checked (in fact, I'd recommend a complete evalutation of your psyche
> considering you are obviously in your own false world that you seem to
have
> mastered).
>
> The more you talk, the more ignorant you look. I wonder who you think you
> are impressing? How about this, for all of those people that Pikoro is
> impressing, respond and say so. I'm going to ignore you from now on, feel
> free to keep your lunatic rantings going. Good luck in the real world,
> you've yet to tell us what you do for a living.
>
> Clint
>
>
| |
| Pikoro 2003-08-24, 10:27 pm |
| You are right here, please observe that I am no longer answering personal
posts.
These guys have no arguments, no proof and no brain, that is why they have
to shield themselves with insults.
"R.A.D." <non.ya@beeswax.com> wrote in message
news:ESc2b.188205$Oz4.50848@rwcrnsc54...
> The thing is even if he is 12 you guys are acting his age and disrupting
an
> informative NG. The best thing to do is don't feed the Trolls. You will
> probably Flame me for this,but that will only give you Troll status as
well.
>
> Regards R.A.D.
>
> "RussS" <yeah_right@roflmao.com> wrote in message
> news:T5c2b.126097$JA5.2929585@news.xtra.co.nz...
> > Clint
> >
> > I think he is like a 12yr old kid. Not sure, but what I am sure of is
> that
> > he has a serious attitude problem .... lol
> >
> >
>
>
| |
| Clint Kennedy 2003-08-25, 1:25 am |
| Yeah, but it's entertaining. All we have to do is feed him and he keeps on
spitting out more and more hilarity.
-c
"RussS" <yeah_right@roflmao.com> wrote in message
news:T5c2b.126097$JA5.2929585@news.xtra.co.nz...
> Clint
>
> I think he is like a 12yr old kid. Not sure, but what I am sure of is
that
> he has a serious attitude problem .... lol
>
>
|
|
|
|
|