|
Home > Archive > microsoft.public.exchange2000.admin > October 2002 > bridgehead server
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
|
|
| n3w5ki11 2002-10-05, 8:45 pm |
| Can you have mailboxs for the local office on the
bridgehead server?
>-----Original Message-----
>The concept of a bridgehead server is for mail routing,
>thus this is the box to place on all the connectors.
>Hence, it needs to have more CPU/Ram resources but does
>not need the disk space as it does not hold mailboxes
>usually. So, really, it's a matter of picking a box for
>the connectors to sit on especially the IMC.
>
>hope that helps
>>-----Original Message-----
>>My company is looking at going to exchange 2000. We
have
>>multiple remote offices and want to have an exchange
>>server at each location routing to the bridgehead
server
>>at the main office. I'm having trouble finding
>>documentation on doing this. Does anyone have
>>suggestions? Also,is there a license issue with the
main
>>xchange server acting as the bridgehead. Do you have
to
>>have user licese on the main box for accounts at remote
>>offices? Any information would be appreciated.
>>.
>>
>.
>
| |
| Gary McDonnell 2002-10-05, 8:45 pm |
| If you did that what would be the point of having the servers at the remote
locations?
Depending on how many remote offices / servers you have you might want to
have a dedicated bridgehead server in the main office (that is, separate
from the server at the main office that has mailboxes on it).
/gary mcdonnell
"n3w5ki11" <chris@ecofl.com> wrote in message
news:88c601c264a7$d0daa020$39e
f2ecf@TKMSFTNGXA08...
Can you have mailboxs for the local office on the
bridgehead server?
>-----Original Message-----
>The concept of a bridgehead server is for mail routing,
>thus this is the box to place on all the connectors.
>Hence, it needs to have more CPU/Ram resources but does
>not need the disk space as it does not hold mailboxes
>usually. So, really, it's a matter of picking a box for
>the connectors to sit on especially the IMC.
>
>hope that helps
>>-----Original Message-----
>>My company is looking at going to exchange 2000. We
have
>>multiple remote offices and want to have an exchange
>>server at each location routing to the bridgehead
server
>>at the main office. I'm having trouble finding
>>documentation on doing this. Does anyone have
>>suggestions? Also,is there a license issue with the
main
>>xchange server acting as the bridgehead. Do you have
to
>>have user licese on the main box for accounts at remote
>>offices? Any information would be appreciated.
>>.
>>
>.
>
|
|
|
|
|