| Bman MCSD 2003-09-24, 2:24 am |
| Teddi,
Well to answer your first question... they tricked you.
You were supposed to stick with SQL 7 and I believe there
is another question in the same case that says something
to the effect of keeping existing db structure. That is
the correct answer for that one too. Now for the Law Firm,
I believe you are probably referring to A.Datum Corp but
I'm not sure what question you are referring to. Be more
specific and I'll see if I can help out.
>-----Original Message-----
>I failed the 70.300 exam today. I know I was very close
to passing,
>however, the score only shows pass/fail. On the exam was
a case study about
>an e-commerce web app that had an extensive question
about the correct
>method of testin from a stagging server.
>
>Also in this case study was a question about if you
should upgrade from SQL
>Server 7.0 to SQL Server 2000. I said yes, however, in
the interview with
>the finance manager she said "we must keep cost down and
will continue to
>use the current inventory database." I'm now wondering
if I should not have
>included upgrading to SQL Server 2000. It used a XML Web
service as part of
>the solution and I thought I would need SQL Server 2000
for this.
>
>One of the other case studies was about a law firm whose
mainframe billing
>app can only accept TCP/IP binary communications
protocol. Should given the
>choice of a Transactional serviced component and a queued
component which
>should be the correct answer? I answered Transactional
service comonent,
>but know I am wondering if I should have used Queued
component because of
>the binary communications protocol.
>
>I would really appreciate any direction. I would like to
take the exam
>again this week.
>
>Teddi, MCSD
>
>
>.
>
|