|
Home > Archive > microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcsd > July 2003 > What's wrong with the MOC's ?
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
What's wrong with the MOC's ?
|
|
|
| Hi.
It seems to me that a lot of people in here use training kits and all kinds
of third-party books and stuff to prepare for their examns.
Via the company where I work, I have access to all MS MOC's and
transcenders. Shouldn't those be sufficient for me to prepare for the MCSD
certification, or do I need extra training kits and such ?
(I'm doing the first examn 70-306 next week, so I guess I'll find out soon
enough ;-))
Thanx...
| |
| Guy Cox 2003-07-29, 12:24 am |
| Xref: intern1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcsd:22726
Smooth move... You've just put your company in jeopardy. MOC materials are
good for the originally enrolled student. Instead spending money on extra
training materials you could spend it on a retainer fee for a defense
attorney.
..
Guy
"anouk" <anouk@fkoff.com> wrote in message
news:e0vv00VVDHA.1984@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> Hi.
>
> It seems to me that a lot of people in here use training kits and all
kinds
> of third-party books and stuff to prepare for their examns.
>
> Via the company where I work, I have access to all MS MOC's and
> transcenders. Shouldn't those be sufficient for me to prepare for the MCSD
> certification, or do I need extra training kits and such ?
>
> (I'm doing the first examn 70-306 next week, so I guess I'll find out soon
> enough ;-))
>
>
> Thanx...
>
>
| |
| Keith Nicholson 2003-07-29, 9:23 am |
| If his company is a Microsoft Certified Partner, then they have the benefit
of ordering these for self-study. If not, then you might be right.
--
Peace,
Keith Nicholson, MCSD, MCAD
"Guy Cox" <gcoxjr-$nospam$-@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:%23tls8eYVDHA.3232@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> Smooth move... You've just put your company in jeopardy. MOC materials are
> good for the originally enrolled student. Instead spending money on extra
> training materials you could spend it on a retainer fee for a defense
> attorney.
> .
> Guy
>
> "anouk" <anouk@fkoff.com> wrote in message
> news:e0vv00VVDHA.1984@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> > Hi.
> >
> > It seems to me that a lot of people in here use training kits and all
> kinds
> > of third-party books and stuff to prepare for their examns.
> >
> > Via the company where I work, I have access to all MS MOC's and
> > transcenders. Shouldn't those be sufficient for me to prepare for the
MCSD
> > certification, or do I need extra training kits and such ?
> >
> > (I'm doing the first examn 70-306 next week, so I guess I'll find out
soon
> > enough ;-))
> >
> >
> > Thanx...
> >
> >
>
>
| |
|
| What?
My company buys the MOC's for me and pays the training courses. What's
illegal about that ?
"Guy Cox" <gcoxjr-$nospam$-@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:%23tls8eYVDHA.3232@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> Smooth move... You've just put your company in jeopardy. MOC materials are
> good for the originally enrolled student. Instead spending money on extra
> training materials you could spend it on a retainer fee for a defense
> attorney.
> .
> Guy
>
> "anouk" <anouk@fkoff.com> wrote in message
> news:e0vv00VVDHA.1984@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> > Hi.
> >
> > It seems to me that a lot of people in here use training kits and all
> kinds
> > of third-party books and stuff to prepare for their examns.
> >
> > Via the company where I work, I have access to all MS MOC's and
> > transcenders. Shouldn't those be sufficient for me to prepare for the
MCSD
> > certification, or do I need extra training kits and such ?
> >
> > (I'm doing the first examn 70-306 next week, so I guess I'll find out
soon
> > enough ;-))
> >
> >
> > Thanx...
> >
> >
>
>
| |
|
| That's just Gary being Gary. Don't worry about it. If you have read
his other posts you'd know how he is.
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003 19:39:21 +0200, "anouk" <anouk@fkoff.com> wrote:
>What?
>
>My company buys the MOC's for me and pays the training courses. What's
>illegal about that ?
>
>
>"Guy Cox" <gcoxjr-$nospam$-@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:%23tls8eYVDHA.3232@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
>> Smooth move... You've just put your company in jeopardy. MOC materials are
>> good for the originally enrolled student. Instead spending money on extra
>> training materials you could spend it on a retainer fee for a defense
>> attorney.
>> .
>> Guy
[snip]
| |
| Paulo Morgado 2003-07-29, 8:24 pm |
| Hi
From my little experience, I found out that MOCs are getting skils, tarining
kits are for getting a certification.
On http://www.microsoft.com/traincert/mcp you can find out that, for some
exams, you don't have MOCs to cover all the subjects.
Paulo Morgado
"anouk" <anouk@fkoff.com> wrote in message
news:e0vv00VVDHA.1984@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> Hi.
>
> It seems to me that a lot of people in here use training kits and all
kinds
> of third-party books and stuff to prepare for their examns.
>
> Via the company where I work, I have access to all MS MOC's and
> transcenders. Shouldn't those be sufficient for me to prepare for the MCSD
> certification, or do I need extra training kits and such ?
>
> (I'm doing the first examn 70-306 next week, so I guess I'll find out soon
> enough ;-))
>
>
> Thanx...
>
>
|
|
|
|
|