| Author |
Re: VB vs. C# Track - A SURVEY TO FIND OUT!!!
|
|
| Wray Smallwood 2003-06-27, 3:23 am |
| Let's take a survey!! I constructed an ASP.NET page on my personal site.
Click the link and vote once on your preference. If enough people do this it
will become statistically significant.
http://www.elgranadahome.com/survey/
Wray Smallwood
"Shailendra Sharma" <spshailendra@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:050501c33c30$847e91d0$a30
1280a@phx.gbl...
> I think the C# people are definetly higher.
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >Does anyone have any figures on the number of people who
> >chose the VB vs C# testing track for their MCSD
> >certification?
> >
> >- Thanks
| |
| Vu Dang 2003-06-27, 7:23 pm |
| A lot more people are taking C# route. Why is that? VB has a lot of useful
syntax that C# does not.
1) declarative event handling
2) single method implementing multiple interface functions
3) property with parameters
4) when clause for catch blocks
5) imports is more powerful than using because imports includes not only
classes of a namespace but also namespaces of that namespace.
6) optional parameters. This is very useful in declaring multiple versions
of constructors
7) C# compiles to smaller MSIL but have you try vb in debugging mode? I feel
VB code starts up a lot quicker in debugging mode than C#.
Vu Dang
| |
| George Prado 2003-06-29, 12:23 am |
| If I had a dollar for every fool who ran out and claimed
that VB is a better language than C#, I'd have my MCSD
paid for in full. And if you want to get into a better
syntax battle maybe you can have a go with the VFP guys.
I personaly think that C# is a better language than VB,
therefor I write in it. If you feel that a fast debuger
is a feature... I think you spend too much time debuging.
George Prado
Concessive Technologies, Inc.
"French is the language of love, for every thing else
there's C#" 
>-----Original Message-----
>A lot more people are taking C# route. Why is that? VB
has a lot of useful
>syntax that C# does not.
>
>1) declarative event handling
>2) single method implementing multiple interface
functions
>3) property with parameters
>4) when clause for catch blocks
>5) imports is more powerful than using because imports
includes not only
>classes of a namespace but also namespaces of that
namespace.
>6) optional parameters. This is very useful in
declaring multiple versions
>of constructors
>7) C# compiles to smaller MSIL but have you try vb in
debugging mode? I feel
>VB code starts up a lot quicker in debugging mode than
C#.
>
>Vu Dang
>
>
>.
>
| |
| Vu Dang 2003-06-29, 2:23 am |
| You call every one who do not share your view of the world a fool.
"George Prado" <1@net.net> wrote in message
news:17ae01c33df8$0d104660$a60
1280a@phx.gbl...
> If I had a dollar for every fool who ran out and claimed
> that VB is a better language than C#, I'd have my MCSD
> paid for in full. And if you want to get into a better
> syntax battle maybe you can have a go with the VFP guys.
> I personaly think that C# is a better language than VB,
> therefor I write in it. If you feel that a fast debuger
> is a feature... I think you spend too much time debuging.
>
> George Prado
> Concessive Technologies, Inc.
> "French is the language of love, for every thing else
> there's C#"
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >A lot more people are taking C# route. Why is that? VB
> has a lot of useful
> >syntax that C# does not.
> >
> >1) declarative event handling
> >2) single method implementing multiple interface
> functions
> >3) property with parameters
> >4) when clause for catch blocks
> >5) imports is more powerful than using because imports
> includes not only
> >classes of a namespace but also namespaces of that
> namespace.
> >6) optional parameters. This is very useful in
> declaring multiple versions
> >of constructors
> >7) C# compiles to smaller MSIL but have you try vb in
> debugging mode? I feel
> >VB code starts up a lot quicker in debugging mode than
> C#.
> >
> >Vu Dang
> >
> >
> >.
> >
| |
| JoeLogic 2003-07-04, 8:48 am |
| I studying for took the 70-315 exam cause I prefer C#. My employer
uses VB so they were kinda bent. Oh well.
But I found that the test nor the studying really focused on
language-specific issues. So why not do the C# track, even if your a
VB person? If you consider yourself a .NET professional you're most
likely gonna wind up using both languages anyway.
|
|
|
|