Home > Archive > microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcsd > June 2003 > Finished MS self paced training book for 70-316 tried trancender and im dissapointed





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Finished MS self paced training book for 70-316 tried trancender and im dissapointed
DEK

2003-06-22, 5:23 pm


So now I realize that this book doesn't cover everything, I was thinking
of writing an application which would include every possible part of the
skills being measured to learn the gaps, leaning on MSDN as I do it, any
suggestions?
--
Thanks
DEK
Kline Sphere

2003-06-23, 6:23 am

>I was thinking
>of writing an application which would include every possible part of the
>skills being measured to learn the gaps, leaning on MSDN as I do it, any
>suggestions?


One very big application!

No one application would use all the techniques or technologies
covered by the topics.

Developing software systems is not about how to incorporate every
feature and buzz word a development tool(s) provide, it is about
solving business problems.
DEK

2003-06-23, 9:24 am

In article < 8fldfvchcekocbbt932urhm51i735l
pjq3@4ax.com>, Kline Sphere=20
<=99> says...
> >I was thinking=20
> >of writing an application which would include every possible part of the=

=20
> >skills being measured to learn the gaps, leaning on MSDN as I do it, any=

=20
> >suggestions?

>=20
> One very big application!
>=20
> No one application would use all the techniques or technologies
> covered by the topics.
>=20
> Developing software systems is not about how to incorporate every
> feature and buzz word a development tool(s) provide, it is about
> solving business problems.
>=20


I know this, it would be contrived for my learning purposes and=20
implement a part from each skill set.

--=20
Thanks=20
DEK
Nathan

2003-06-23, 10:24 am

Xref: intern1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcsd:21751

Don't write one big application.

Try this:
Get rough specifications and develop
(1) One simple windows application (user interface and business logic
layers) consuming data from SQL Server using at least ADO or ADO.NET
(2) The same application logic with a web user interface (employing either
ASP/ASP.NET)
(3) Package and deploy both on a different machine from the development box.

Nathan H.O.



dotnetjournal

2003-06-23, 11:23 am

How about a appplication that writes applications so you don't have to !
--
Dave Dixon (MCAD.net (CM), MCP)
www.dotnetjournal.com
"Nathan" <vbkenya@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:eUS30mZODHA.2160@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> Don't write one big application.
>
> Try this:
> Get rough specifications and develop
> (1) One simple windows application (user interface and business logic
> layers) consuming data from SQL Server using at least ADO or ADO.NET
> (2) The same application logic with a web user interface (employing either
> ASP/ASP.NET)
> (3) Package and deploy both on a different machine from the development

box.
>
> Nathan H.O.
>
>
>



Kline Sphere

2003-06-23, 12:23 pm

>How about a appplication that writes applications so you don't have to !

Already exists, it's called 'outsourcing' version 3.x. However
expectations of the version 3.x release tend to be over rated.
Sponsored Links





Free Braindumps | MCSE braindumps software forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 examnotes.net