|
Home > Archive > microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcsd > May 2003 > 70-300 Analyzing Bus Req
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
70-300 Analyzing Bus Req
|
|
| Rob Brennan 2003-05-23, 3:23 pm |
| Anyone taking the 70-300 will have fun. Maybe you will
but, I did not. I failed today. I have my MCSD for V6
and MCAD for .NET. This is the first test I failed.
Furthermore, I failed the 70-300 Beta which was 5 case
studies and 104 questions. The actual test was only 3
case studies and 30 questions.
Look, I am no genius. So no wise remarks please.
Rob
| |
|
| Do not feel that bad. I failed the beta too. Right now I'm studying the MS
Press book and I think I know why I failed. I really do not have much
experience with analyzing solutions, envision the solution, MSF, etc.
I plan to study and after everything will be clear enough I'll go and take
the exam. There is no hurry.
Danut
MCSD (VC6), MCDBA, MCAD.NET, MCP
"Rob Brennan" <rbrennan10@msn.com> wrote in message
news:106a01c3215f$97f7b930$a40
1280a@phx.gbl...
> Anyone taking the 70-300 will have fun. Maybe you will
> but, I did not. I failed today. I have my MCSD for V6
> and MCAD for .NET. This is the first test I failed.
> Furthermore, I failed the 70-300 Beta which was 5 case
> studies and 104 questions. The actual test was only 3
> case studies and 30 questions.
>
> Look, I am no genius. So no wise remarks please.
>
> Rob
| |
| Rob Brennan 2003-05-23, 3:23 pm |
| Throw that book away. That is the only MS press that
won't help. Just make sure you know entities and
relationships. Even though there are only 2 questions
like that. Not one topic from the book is in the test.
Thanks, but I still feel bad.
>-----Original Message-----
>Do not feel that bad. I failed the beta too. Right now
I'm studying the MS
>Press book and I think I know why I failed. I really do
not have much
>experience with analyzing solutions, envision the
solution, MSF, etc.
>
>I plan to study and after everything will be clear
enough I'll go and take
>the exam. There is no hurry.
>
>Danut
>MCSD (VC6), MCDBA, MCAD.NET, MCP
>
>
>"Rob Brennan" <rbrennan10@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:106a01c3215f$97f7b930$a40
1280a@phx.gbl...
>> Anyone taking the 70-300 will have fun. Maybe you will
>> but, I did not. I failed today. I have my MCSD for V6
>> and MCAD for .NET. This is the first test I failed.
>> Furthermore, I failed the 70-300 Beta which was 5 case
>> studies and 104 questions. The actual test was only 3
>> case studies and 30 questions.
>>
>> Look, I am no genius. So no wise remarks please.
>>
>> Rob
>
>
>.
>
| |
| Kline Sphere 2003-05-25, 1:23 pm |
| There are far better books and information about requirements analysis
than what is covered in that book. Try looking at one or two of the
software engineering books (By Roger Pressman, Ian Somerville, etc).
Remember that the msf is only microsoft's own process model which is
happens to be based on the spiral model. In the real world companies
adapt a number of process models to suit their own business solutions
and needs, the choice of process model used depends on the type of
solution - their is no 'one size fits all'. Having said that, the
spiral model is very well suited to the object oriented approach to
software development.
BTW, my own view is that the msf is an excellent adaptation of the
spiral model.
On Fri, 23 May 2003 14:30:08 -0500, "Danut" <danutzp1@hotmail.com>
wrote:
>Do not feel that bad. I failed the beta too. Right now I'm studying the MS
>Press book and I think I know why I failed. I really do not have much
>experience with analyzing solutions, envision the solution, MSF, etc.
>
>I plan to study and after everything will be clear enough I'll go and take
>the exam. There is no hurry.
>
>Danut
>MCSD (VC6), MCDBA, MCAD.NET, MCP
>
>
>"Rob Brennan" <rbrennan10@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:106a01c3215f$97f7b930$a40
1280a@phx.gbl...
>> Anyone taking the 70-300 will have fun. Maybe you will
>> but, I did not. I failed today. I have my MCSD for V6
>> and MCAD for .NET. This is the first test I failed.
>> Furthermore, I failed the 70-300 Beta which was 5 case
>> studies and 104 questions. The actual test was only 3
>> case studies and 30 questions.
>>
>> Look, I am no genius. So no wise remarks please.
>>
>> Rob
>
| |
|
| After I pass 70-300 I plan to study for IBM 486 and then IEEE CSDP.
I have some of the books recommended for those exams but I did not get the
chance and time to study them.
Thank you for your recommendation!
Danut
"Kline Sphere" <T> wrote in message
news:2bu1dvoc0cv722jbjlthgkn8s
m8r1qm9mu@4ax.com...
> There are far better books and information about requirements analysis
> than what is covered in that book. Try looking at one or two of the
> software engineering books (By Roger Pressman, Ian Somerville, etc).
>
> Remember that the msf is only microsoft's own process model which is
> happens to be based on the spiral model. In the real world companies
> adapt a number of process models to suit their own business solutions
> and needs, the choice of process model used depends on the type of
> solution - their is no 'one size fits all'. Having said that, the
> spiral model is very well suited to the object oriented approach to
> software development.
>
> BTW, my own view is that the msf is an excellent adaptation of the
> spiral model.
>
>
> On Fri, 23 May 2003 14:30:08 -0500, "Danut" <danutzp1@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >Do not feel that bad. I failed the beta too. Right now I'm studying the
MS
> >Press book and I think I know why I failed. I really do not have much
> >experience with analyzing solutions, envision the solution, MSF, etc.
> >
> >I plan to study and after everything will be clear enough I'll go and
take
> >the exam. There is no hurry.
> >
> >Danut
> >MCSD (VC6), MCDBA, MCAD.NET, MCP
> >
> >
> >"Rob Brennan" <rbrennan10@msn.com> wrote in message
> > news:106a01c3215f$97f7b930$a40
1280a@phx.gbl...
> >> Anyone taking the 70-300 will have fun. Maybe you will
> >> but, I did not. I failed today. I have my MCSD for V6
> >> and MCAD for .NET. This is the first test I failed.
> >> Furthermore, I failed the 70-300 Beta which was 5 case
> >> studies and 104 questions. The actual test was only 3
> >> case studies and 30 questions.
> >>
> >> Look, I am no genius. So no wise remarks please.
> >>
> >> Rob
> >
>
| |
|
| I just received the ExamCram2 book for the 70-300 exam. This one seems to be
better than the MS book.
"Rob Brennan" <rbrennan10@msn.com> wrote in message
news:0f0d01c32164$50cd64b0$a60
1280a@phx.gbl...
> Throw that book away. That is the only MS press that
> won't help. Just make sure you know entities and
> relationships. Even though there are only 2 questions
> like that. Not one topic from the book is in the test.
>
> Thanks, but I still feel bad.
>
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >Do not feel that bad. I failed the beta too. Right now
> I'm studying the MS
> >Press book and I think I know why I failed. I really do
> not have much
> >experience with analyzing solutions, envision the
> solution, MSF, etc.
> >
> >I plan to study and after everything will be clear
> enough I'll go and take
> >the exam. There is no hurry.
> >
> >Danut
> >MCSD (VC6), MCDBA, MCAD.NET, MCP
> >
> >
> >"Rob Brennan" <rbrennan10@msn.com> wrote in message
> > news:106a01c3215f$97f7b930$a40
1280a@phx.gbl...
> >> Anyone taking the 70-300 will have fun. Maybe you will
> >> but, I did not. I failed today. I have my MCSD for V6
> >> and MCAD for .NET. This is the first test I failed.
> >> Furthermore, I failed the 70-300 Beta which was 5 case
> >> studies and 104 questions. The actual test was only 3
> >> case studies and 30 questions.
> >>
> >> Look, I am no genius. So no wise remarks please.
> >>
> >> Rob
> >
> >
> >.
> >
|
|
|
|
|