|
Home > Archive > microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcsd > November 2002 > 71 - 300 content disappointing
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
71 - 300 content disappointing
|
|
| Danijel Arsenovski 2002-11-13, 10:23 pm |
| No UML, design patterns, OOAD (or some very basic questions), and these are
some practices widely accepted and not proprietary, even VB was modified so
it is fully OO, but no real questions about it?... I guess it is considered
"too academic", but if you pretend to be architect, senior dev etc, you
should be familiar with it....
--
Danijel Arsenovski MCP, MCSD
email: darsenovski@hotpop.com
| |
| Danut 2002-11-14, 10:23 am |
| If you want UML then check this out:
http://www-1.ibm.com/certify/tests/obj486.shtml
This is my next exam after I finish with MCSD.NET.
Danut, MCAD
"Danijel Arsenovski" <darsenovski@hhh.com> wrote in message
news:uj7yLA5iCHA.1572@tkmsftngp09...
> No UML, design patterns, OOAD (or some very basic questions), and these
are
> some practices widely accepted and not proprietary, even VB was modified
so
> it is fully OO, but no real questions about it?... I guess it is
considered
> "too academic", but if you pretend to be architect, senior dev etc, you
> should be familiar with it....
>
> --
> Danijel Arsenovski MCP, MCSD
> email: darsenovski@hotpop.com
>
>
| |
| Ignacio Machin 2002-11-14, 5:23 pm |
| Danijel ( Aka "El tigre") :
You are right, I was also surprised wth the lack of UML in the exam, even
so little questions of ORM , I think that the main different between the 100
and the 300 were the situation where a web service was used. Nevertheless it
was a good exam, the question are much better that the one I recall from the
100, but againg I feel that they should give more weight to the things you
mention.
Regarding the exam from IBM , I would love to pass a similar exam from
Rational, but they only offer it to theirs partners  let's hope they
change their mind someday.
Cheers.
--
Ignacio Machin
Senior System Engineer.
Bitcore, Inc.
machin_remove_this@bitc
ore.com
ICQ:15883233
MSN:ignaciomachin2001_remove_t
his@hotmail.com
(786) 344 5163
----------------------------------
MCSD ( VB6 )
MCAD.NET ( C# )
"Danut" <danutzp1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:##jxqI$iCHA.2752@tkmsftngp11...
> If you want UML then check this out:
> http://www-1.ibm.com/certify/tests/obj486.shtml
>
> This is my next exam after I finish with MCSD.NET.
>
> Danut, MCAD
>
> "Danijel Arsenovski" <darsenovski@hhh.com> wrote in message
> news:uj7yLA5iCHA.1572@tkmsftngp09...
> > No UML, design patterns, OOAD (or some very basic questions), and these
> are
> > some practices widely accepted and not proprietary, even VB was modified
> so
> > it is fully OO, but no real questions about it?... I guess it is
> considered
> > "too academic", but if you pretend to be architect, senior dev etc, you
> > should be familiar with it....
> >
> > --
> > Danijel Arsenovski MCP, MCSD
> > email: darsenovski@hotpop.com
> >
> >
>
>
|
|
|
|
|