|
Home > Archive > microsoft.public.certification > March 2004 > 70-299
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
|
|
| harryr 2004-02-06, 11:23 am |
| Exam 70-299 will be available from February 13, 2004.
| |
| =?Utf-8?B?TcOpcjB2MWdpZW4=?= 2004-02-10, 6:23 am |
| Does that mean that beta results will be available in the week?
BTW, it was a really hard exam !!
| |
| Sgt Galaxy 2004-02-11, 6:23 am |
| Yes it was.
I hope i pass this one, hahahaha...
We hopefully know it friday the 13th?!!!
Aaaaargh: bad karma
>-----Original Message-----
>Does that mean that beta results will be available in the
week?
>
>BTW, it was a really hard exam !!
>
>.
>
| |
| Sgt Galaxy 2004-02-13, 6:23 am |
| Bad karma indeed.... failed!
Just like many others i guess. The minumum scores for
a beta exam are just to high! This is just another near
miss (again).
A beta exam takes more time/more questions to answer and
still they want us to score the same minumum score as was
it a regular exam.
I thought the deal was that we help the beta exam
designers, and for that we get a fair chance to pass an
exam?
Well, i am also MCSA & MCSE and still did not pass one of
them! So, what's going on? This indicates a too high
minumum score for a beta exam (i missed them each time
with about 50-75 points, aaargh!)
>-----Original Message-----
>Yes it was.
>
>I hope i pass this one, hahahaha...
>
>We hopefully know it friday the 13th?!!!
>
>Aaaaargh: bad karma
>
the[color=blue]
>week?
>.
>
| |
| Tom Helms [MSFT] 2004-02-13, 12:24 pm |
| The minimum score to pass a beta exam is the same as the live exam.
--
Tom Helms [MSFT]
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights."Please
do not send e-mail directly to this alias. This alias is for newsgroup
purposes only."
"Sgt Galaxy" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:fbd701c3f21c$e77fbbe0$a40
1280a@phx.gbl...[color=blue]
> Bad karma indeed.... failed!
>
> Just like many others i guess. The minumum scores for
> a beta exam are just to high! This is just another near
> miss (again).
>
> A beta exam takes more time/more questions to answer and
> still they want us to score the same minumum score as was
> it a regular exam.
>
> I thought the deal was that we help the beta exam
> designers, and for that we get a fair chance to pass an
> exam?
>
> Well, i am also MCSA & MCSE and still did not pass one of
> them! So, what's going on? This indicates a too high
> minumum score for a beta exam (i missed them each time
> with about 50-75 points, aaargh!)
>
>
> the
| |
| Sgt Galaxy 2004-02-13, 5:23 pm |
| Hello Tom,
My explaination wasn't that good i guess...
Let me try it again.
A beta exam cannot be handled the same as a regular exam,
why:
- This due to the fact that a beta exam takes more
time/effort (for example: keeping focussed all the time)
- You can't prepare because beta exams are always on short
notice and the related products are usually new (fact)
- A beta has more questions than a regular exam (fact)
So why use the same score minimum for beta's and regular
exams ? A beta is really 'hard' according to the regular
exam.
I guess if we (beta testers) take the regular exam, we
would have passed...
I am very curious: who shares this opinion?
Regards,
Sgt Galaxy
>-----Original Message-----
>The minimum score to pass a beta exam is the same as the
live exam.
>
>--
>Tom Helms [MSFT]
>
>This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and
confers no rights."Please
>do not send e-mail directly to this alias. This alias is
for newsgroup
>purposes only."
>
>"Sgt Galaxy" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote
in message
> news:fbd701c3f21c$e77fbbe0$a40
1280a@phx.gbl...
was[color=blue]
of[color=blue]
>
>
>.
>
| |
| Tom Helms [MSFT] 2004-02-13, 6:24 pm |
| I will not try to disprove your statements below. I presume you
understand the exam development process, if not, here's the link:
http://www.microsoft.com/learning/m...es/examdev.asp. Perhaps,
one of the Microsoft Learning people who monitor these newsgroups can give
you a better insight.
--
Tom Helms [MSFT]
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights."Please
do not send e-mail directly to this alias. This alias is for newsgroup
purposes only."
"Sgt Galaxy" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:f6f001c3f279$badc7300$a10
1280a@phx.gbl...[color=blue]
> Hello Tom,
>
> My explaination wasn't that good i guess...
> Let me try it again.
>
> A beta exam cannot be handled the same as a regular exam,
> why:
> - This due to the fact that a beta exam takes more
> time/effort (for example: keeping focussed all the time)
> - You can't prepare because beta exams are always on short
> notice and the related products are usually new (fact)
> - A beta has more questions than a regular exam (fact)
>
> So why use the same score minimum for beta's and regular
> exams ? A beta is really 'hard' according to the regular
> exam.
>
> I guess if we (beta testers) take the regular exam, we
> would have passed...
>
> I am very curious: who shares this opinion?
>
> Regards,
>
> Sgt Galaxy
>
>
>
> live exam.
> confers no rights."Please
> for newsgroup
> in message
> was
> of
| |
|
| You fail, so something is wrong with the process??
Maybe something is wrong with your way of thinking.
"Sgt Galaxy" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:fbd701c3f21c$e77fbbe0$a40
1280a@phx.gbl...[color=blue]
> Bad karma indeed.... failed!
>
> Just like many others i guess. The minumum scores for
> a beta exam are just to high! This is just another near
> miss (again).
>
> A beta exam takes more time/more questions to answer and
> still they want us to score the same minumum score as was
> it a regular exam.
>
> I thought the deal was that we help the beta exam
> designers, and for that we get a fair chance to pass an
> exam?
>
> Well, i am also MCSA & MCSE and still did not pass one of
> them! So, what's going on? This indicates a too high
> minumum score for a beta exam (i missed them each time
> with about 50-75 points, aaargh!)
>
>
> the
| |
| Sgt Galaxy 2004-02-14, 4:24 am |
| Thanks Tom,
I know how the beta exam process works.
We take a beta and thereby we give test designers input
about how to build the regular exam. It's for free and if
you succeed in passing the test you get the exam on your
transcript. Sounds like a great deal!
Unfortunatelly lots of people just don't succeed.
Even after multiple tries (with different beta's), and
they sure have skills. The question is why don't they
succeed? Why still getting a 'near miss' ?
I think this is because the minimum score for a beta is
the same as for the regular exam. And as i explained in a
previous post (and this is the real problem):
- A beta exam takes more time/effort (for example: staying
focussed all the time)
- A beta has more questions than a regular exam (fact)
Maybe the test designers should ask themselves if the
minimum score for a beta should be the same as for a
regular exam.......... and that's all!
I personally think that i will not pass any beta exams (at
the mcsa/mcse skill level). This although i'm a MCSA/MCSE
myself! So what's going on ?
If only the best-of-the best will get a passing score for
a beta exam... the rest better study for the regular ones.
Maybe a beta test designer can give us more input on this
subject?
Thanks in advance,
Sgt Galaxy
>-----Original Message-----
> I will not try to disprove your statements below. I
presume you
>understand the exam development process, if not, here's
the link:
>http://www.microsoft.com/learning/m...policies/examde
v.asp. Perhaps,
>one of the Microsoft Learning people who monitor these
newsgroups can give
>you a better insight.
>
>--
>Tom Helms [MSFT]
>
>This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and
confers no rights."Please
>do not send e-mail directly to this alias. This alias is
for newsgroup
>purposes only."
>
>"Sgt Galaxy" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote
in message
> news:f6f001c3f279$badc7300$a10
1280a@phx.gbl...
exam,[color=blue]
short[color=blue]
near[color=blue]
and[color=blue]
an[color=blue]
>
>
>.
>
| |
| Thierry DEMAN [MVP] 2004-02-14, 11:24 am |
| Sgt Galaxy wrote:
> Thanks Tom,
>
> I know how the beta exam process works.
>
> We take a beta and thereby we give test designers input
> about how to build the regular exam. It's for free and if
> you succeed in passing the test you get the exam on your
> transcript. Sounds like a great deal!
>
> Unfortunatelly lots of people just don't succeed.
> Even after multiple tries (with different beta's), and
> they sure have skills. The question is why don't they
> succeed? Why still getting a 'near miss' ?
>
> I think this is because the minimum score for a beta is
> the same as for the regular exam. And as i explained in a
> previous post (and this is the real problem):
> - A beta exam takes more time/effort (for example: staying
> focussed all the time)
> - A beta has more questions than a regular exam (fact)
>
> Maybe the test designers should ask themselves if the
> minimum score for a beta should be the same as for a
> regular exam.......... and that's all!
>
> I personally think that i will not pass any beta exams (at
> the mcsa/mcse skill level). This although i'm a MCSA/MCSE
> myself! So what's going on ?
>
> If only the best-of-the best will get a passing score for
> a beta exam... the rest better study for the regular ones.
>
> Maybe a beta test designer can give us more input on this
> subject?
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Sgt Galaxy
>
>
Hi.
You must take the good side of beta tests!
I allways pass the first time after failing the beta test. So it must be a
good learning...
It is also truth that beta tests are not so easy as before... but I think
that this means that exams will be harder!
Bye.
--
Thierry DEMAN-BARCELÒ
MVP Exchange,SQL/Server,[MCSE option Messaging, MCSA 2003].
| |
|
| Over the last 3 years, I've a total of 15 Microsoft and Comptia beta tests.
Of those, I failed 4--70-225, 70-270, 70-291 and 70-297. I later passed the
live exams except--haven't re-took it yet. Experience with the product while
it was in beta helped me.
"Thierry DEMAN [MVP]" <tdemanNOSPAM@NOSPAMfree.fr> wrote in message
news:uz$fPvw8DHA.4044@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> Sgt Galaxy wrote:
> Hi.
>
> You must take the good side of beta tests!
>
> I allways pass the first time after failing the beta test. So it must be a
> good learning...
>
> It is also truth that beta tests are not so easy as before... but I think
> that this means that exams will be harder!
>
> Bye.
>
> --
> Thierry DEMAN-BARCELÒ
> MVP Exchange,SQL/Server,[MCSE option Messaging, MCSA 2003].
>
>
| |
| Alex Foley 2004-02-16, 2:23 pm |
| hi
well sgt galxy was (almost) right with his comments on beta
exams: i've got 650 points and i needed 700 (71-299),
this really really sux. i got score report today,=20
from vue.
i am also a mcse-2000 and mcsa-2000: security,=20
so this hurts a bit
thx
>-----Original Message-----
>Over the last 3 years, I've a total of 15 Microsoft and=20
Comptia beta tests.=20
>Of those, I failed 4--70-225, 70-270, 70-291 and 70-297.=20
I later passed the=20
>live exams except--haven't re-took it yet. Experience=20
with the product while=20
>it was in beta helped me.
>
>
>
>"Thierry DEMAN [MVP]" <tdemanNOSPAM@NOSPAMfree.fr> wrote=20
in message=20
>news:uz$fPvw8DHA.4044@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
if[color=blue]
your[color=blue]
in a[color=blue]
staying[color=blue]
(at[color=blue]
MCSA/MCSE[color=blue]
for[color=blue]
ones.[color=blue]
this[color=blue]
test. So it must be a[color=blue]
before... but I think[color=blue]
2003].[color=blue]
>
>
>.
>
| |
|
| I don't know my score yet for the 71-299 exam. I still need to retake the
70-297 exam sometime in the future.
"Alex Foley" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:1142701c3f4bd$6eb29720$a4
01280a@phx.gbl...
hi
well sgt galxy was (almost) right with his comments on beta
exams: i've got 650 points and i needed 700 (71-299),
this really really sux. i got score report today,
from vue.
i am also a mcse-2000 and mcsa-2000: security,
so this hurts a bit
thx
>-----Original Message-----
>Over the last 3 years, I've a total of 15 Microsoft and
Comptia beta tests.
>Of those, I failed 4--70-225, 70-270, 70-291 and 70-297.
I later passed the
>live exams except--haven't re-took it yet. Experience
with the product while
>it was in beta helped me.
>
>
>
>"Thierry DEMAN [MVP]" <tdemanNOSPAM@NOSPAMfree.fr> wrote
in message
>news:uz$fPvw8DHA.4044@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
if[color=blue]
your[color=blue]
in a[color=blue]
staying[color=blue]
(at[color=blue]
MCSA/MCSE[color=blue]
for[color=blue]
ones.[color=blue]
this[color=blue]
test. So it must be a[color=blue]
before... but I think[color=blue]
2003].[color=blue]
>
>
>.
>
| |
|
| Just got my score report--850
<MCSE (NT4, W2K, W2K3)> wrote in message
news:uhdQqTP9DHA.2524@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
>I don't know my score yet for the 71-299 exam. I still need to retake the
>70-297 exam sometime in the future.
>
> "Alex Foley" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:1142701c3f4bd$6eb29720$a4
01280a@phx.gbl...
> hi
>
> well sgt galxy was (almost) right with his comments on beta
> exams: i've got 650 points and i needed 700 (71-299),
> this really really sux. i got score report today,
> from vue.
>
> i am also a mcse-2000 and mcsa-2000: security,
> so this hurts a bit
>
> thx
>
>
> Comptia beta tests.
> I later passed the
> with the product while
> in message
> if
> your
> in a
> staying
> (at
> MCSA/MCSE
> for
> ones.
> this
> test. So it must be a
> before... but I think
> 2003].
>
>
| |
| buzzlightyear 2004-03-17, 9:47 am |
| What a baby! It was a free beta. You ought to know the material coming in or at least look at it as a free practice test. It is still called a TEST, by definintion tests are supposed to be hard, otherwise they would call it an "easy".
I have taken beta tests before for MS and CompTIA. Some I pass others I fail, either way I try to learn what I can and move on.
quote:
Originally posted by Sgt Galaxy
Bad karma indeed.... failed!
Just like many others i guess. The minumum scores for
a beta exam are just to high! This is just another near
miss (again).
A beta exam takes more time/more questions to answer and
still they want us to score the same minumum score as was
it a regular exam.
I thought the deal was that we help the beta exam
designers, and for that we get a fair chance to pass an
exam?
Well, i am also MCSA & MCSE and still did not pass one of
them! So, what's going on? This indicates a too high
minumum score for a beta exam (i missed them each time
with about 50-75 points, aaargh!)
>-----Original Message-----
>Yes it was.
>
>I hope i pass this one, hahahaha...
>
>We hopefully know it friday the 13th?!!!
>
>Aaaaargh: bad karma
>
the[color=blue]
>week?
>.
>
|
|
|
|
|