|
Home > Archive > microsoft.public.cert.exams.mcse > January 2004 > Award for Worst arguement ever to a newsgroup
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Award for Worst arguement ever to a newsgroup
|
|
| =?Utf-8?B?TWFya28=?= 2004-01-25, 3:23 am |
| Let me see if I have this straight:
Don is advocating that a *professional* can be realised
in just 2-3 weeks with intense braindumping where the
ultimate aim is merely to memorise the answers to test
questions and gain certifications?
That the fight is to take the really good, well paying jobs
from the experienced, by lowering the standards required
before one is considered *professional* and also lowering
the pay rates for every IT job in the process, since the
experience that normally aids in determining the pay scale
is nominal or non-existent?
Is this basically it? Did I miss something?
Any degree of common sense would alert you that this is
just plain wrong. You might immediately resist your
temptation to offer any counter arguement because
your brain would be telling you that surely nobody with
slightly more than a kindergarden exposure to the real
world would ever think that any profession could be invaded
by practitioners with no more than a few weeks experience?
You should have gone with your initial impulse to laugh this
off as someone with a very low IQ trying to bring others
down to his level with obviously flawed logic to argue a
point that is simply not worth arguing.
Notice that he got absolutely no support? From anybody?
This dribble would have gone away if it was recognised
earlier for the complete crap that it is.
To let you know how bad things are - I RARELY agree with
anything that Andy Foster has to offer to this newsgroup. But
his plea that we PLEASE stop feeding the troll was spot on.
So Please - stop.
| |
| The Poster Formerly Known as Kline Sphere 2004-01-27, 3:23 am |
| >Don is advocating that a *professional* can be realised
>in just 2-3 weeks with intense braindumping where the
>ultimate aim is merely to memorise the answers to test
>questions and gain certifications?
These type of people, and the sites that support them, are the reason
why standards have fallen so much.
>That the fight is to take the really good, well paying jobs
>from the experienced, by lowering the standards required
>before one is considered *professional* and also lowering
>the pay rates for every IT job in the process, since the
>experience that normally aids in determining the pay scale
>is nominal or non-existent?
Fortunately that does happen too much. Taking good, well paid jobs
from the experienced, comes as a result of other issues.
>Any degree of common sense would alert you that this is
>just plain wrong. You might immediately resist your
>temptation to offer any counter arguement because
>your brain would be telling you that surely nobody with
>slightly more than a kindergarden exposure to the real
>world would ever think that any profession could be invaded
>by practitioners with no more than a few weeks experience?
..... But it is good fun!
>You should have gone with your initial impulse to laugh this
>off as someone with a very low IQ trying to bring others
>down to his level with obviously flawed logic to argue a
>point that is simply not worth arguing.
.... Repeat, it is good fun!
>Notice that he got absolutely no support? From anybody?
Not surprised in the least.
Kline Sphere (Chalk) MCNGP #3
|
|
|
|
|