Home > Archive > microsoft.public.cert.exams.mcse > August 2003 > Subnetting on the same Physical Network





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Subnetting on the same Physical Network
Myrt Webb

2003-08-25, 6:23 pm

My 216 studies have demonstrated that it is possible to
have two or more subnets on the same physical network.

What puzzles me is why anyone would want to do that?

Enlightment would be appreciated.
Japes

2003-08-25, 6:23 pm

Kindly visit http://www.learntosubnet.com/

--


Regards

Japes aka Jean-Paul Lecrivain

Have you found any Celestine Insights in your life yet?

Homepage: http://members.lycos.co.uk/japes/
Helier Morris Men: http://members.tripod.co.uk/helier/


Consultant

2003-08-25, 6:23 pm

separation of users
separation of workstations from servers
etc
etc

"Myrt Webb" <myrtwebb@centurytel.net> wrote in message
news:034101c36b51$02400960$a60
1280a@phx.gbl...
> My 216 studies have demonstrated that it is possible to
> have two or more subnets on the same physical network.
>
> What puzzles me is why anyone would want to do that?
>
> Enlightment would be appreciated.



Gary - US

2003-08-25, 10:25 pm

To keep different workgroups on separate subnets would be one reason.

--

Semper Fi & God Bless America,

Gary-US MCNGP #20 & retired Jarhead

http://www.mcngp.tk
The MCNGP Team - We're here to help
** Kindly Do The Needful **

"Myrt Webb" <myrtwebb@centurytel.net> wrote in message
news:034101c36b51$02400960$a60
1280a@phx.gbl...
> My 216 studies have demonstrated that it is possible to
> have two or more subnets on the same physical network.
>
> What puzzles me is why anyone would want to do that?
>
> Enlightment would be appreciated.



Herb Martin

2003-08-29, 12:24 pm

It's call a "Multi-net".

It is done for a variety of reasons including:

1) Running out of address on the original subnet
2) Some public, some private addresses
3) Combined two (or more) physical segments and
didn't feel like re-architecting
etc.

You might need "superscopes" if using DHCP and you
will have to consider ROUTING to get things working
correctly.

Two approaches to routing (different difficulty, different
results, different efficiency):

1) Give the gateway an address on BOTH subnets
and set each group of machines' default gateway to
the appropriate address
2) Give every machine an explicit route to the "other"
subnet using their own IP address as the "gateway"
(it's a convention, my address as gateway means
"dump the traffic right onto the wire" without using a
formal gateway.)

#1 is quick to setup and can even be used to prevent the
sets of machine from talking (directly). But any traffic
from group one to group two much traverse the wire TWICE
in each direction -- to the gateway and back.)

#2 A lot more trouble for the admin as the number of stations
grows but gives direct communication without the gateway
being needed for all machine on the local SEGMENT.

--
Herb Martin


Sponsored Links





Free Braindumps | MCSE braindumps software forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 examnotes.net