|
Home > Archive > microsoft.public.cert.exams.mcse > November 2003 > 70-214 passed
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
|
|
|
| I just took it today. Lots of GPO and Routing and Remote
Access questions. I passed (just) only because I have not
had much experience with RRAS, no hands on, just what I
remember from 216 some 6 months ago. On that part I
scored low, but on the rest very high. It helped to
already have done Security+ for PKI and tunneling but was
suprised at how little Certificate Services questions I
got. Gona read up more on RRAS in Resource Kit (best $$
ever spent) and try 220.
Lois
>-----Original Message-----
>Well, after 32 questions the first time before the
testing site computer
>died, 50 questions
>on the next, failed, attempt (692 pass is 700) and 50
more this morning
>(960) I have
>passed 214.
>
>I was on the way to a pass the first time before the test
site died.
>
>Too stupid the second time, didn't bother to review
anything.... DUMB
>
>I was disappointed to see so little detailed questions on
the protocol layer
>of IPsec
>or anything. Still lots of event logging questions.
>
>On to 220.
>
>
>
>.
>
| |
| Tom Helms [MSFT] 2003-11-15, 10:23 pm |
| Congratulations!!!
--
Tom Helms [MSFT]
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
"Please do not send e-mail directly to this alias. This alias is for
newsgroup purposes only."
"Lois" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:036e01c3abe7$a3a042d0$a10
1280a@phx.gbl...[color=blue]
> I just took it today. Lots of GPO and Routing and Remote
> Access questions. I passed (just) only because I have not
> had much experience with RRAS, no hands on, just what I
> remember from 216 some 6 months ago. On that part I
> scored low, but on the rest very high. It helped to
> already have done Security+ for PKI and tunneling but was
> suprised at how little Certificate Services questions I
> got. Gona read up more on RRAS in Resource Kit (best $$
> ever spent) and try 220.
>
> Lois
>
> testing site computer
> more this morning
> site died.
> anything.... DUMB
> the protocol layer
| |
| Larry Samuels MS-MVP XP \(Shell/User\) 2003-11-15, 10:23 pm |
| Congrats!!
--
Larry Samuels MS-MVP (Windows-Shell/User)
Associate Expert
Unofficial FAQ for Windows Server 2003 at
http://home.earthlink.net/~larrysamuels/WS2003FAQ.htm
Expert Zone - www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone
"Lois" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:036e01c3abe7$a3a042d0$a10
1280a@phx.gbl...
> I just took it today. Lots of GPO and Routing and Remote
> Access questions. I passed (just) only because I have not
> had much experience with RRAS, no hands on, just what I
> remember from 216 some 6 months ago. On that part I
> scored low, but on the rest very high. It helped to
> already have done Security+ for PKI and tunneling but was
> suprised at how little Certificate Services questions I
> got. Gona read up more on RRAS in Resource Kit (best $$
> ever spent) and try 220.
>
> Lois
| |
| Marlin Munrow 2003-11-16, 5:23 am |
| This is a tough exam to pass at *any* attempt. I found the questions
I was asked came from all over the 2000 and XP syllabi.
I also saw some tough RRAS questions.
Congratulations on passing a hard exam that relies on *real*
knowledge.
You didnt say if you got 50, 55 or as in my case 62 questions ?
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003 18:16:26 -0800, "Lois"
<anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
>I just took it today. Lots of GPO and Routing and Remote
>Access questions. I passed (just) only because I have not
>had much experience with RRAS, no hands on, just what I
>remember from 216 some 6 months ago. On that part I
>scored low, but on the rest very high. It helped to
>already have done Security+ for PKI and tunneling but was
>suprised at how little Certificate Services questions I
>got. Gona read up more on RRAS in Resource Kit (best $$
>ever spent) and try 220.
>
>Lois
>
>testing site computer
>more this morning
>site died.
>anything.... DUMB
>the protocol layer
|
|
|
|
|