|
Home > Archive > 70-218 > July 2003 > 70-218 Q of the Day Thursday 7/03
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
70-218 Q of the Day Thursday 7/03
|
|
| mrfixit 2003-07-03, 10:03 am |
| Okay, last question for this week. I will not be posting tomorrow, and will answer this one on Monday.
How many targets can be configured for the DFS root and DFS links?
A.)15
B.)3
C.)40
D.)8
E.)None of the above
Have a Great 4th of July!!!! | |
| ghaouf 2003-07-03, 10:07 am |
| e | |
| mrfixit 2003-07-03, 2:51 pm |
| What's the matter people? Too easy? C'mon!
(Okay, I know, you've got all weekend to answer this one.) As for me, I've got plans!!  | |
| karlisi 2003-07-04, 2:46 am |
| E | |
| adam salam 2003-07-04, 1:22 pm |
| quote: Originally posted by mrfixit
Okay, last question for this week. I will not be posting tomorrow, and will answer this one on Monday.
How many targets can be configured for the DFS root and DFS links?
A.)15
B.)3
C.)40
D.)8
E.)None of the above
Have a Great 4th of July!!!!
E.)None of the above
Maximum number of Dfs links that you can assign to a Dfs root is 1000.
Host server is limited to one Dfs root. | |
| mrfixit 2003-07-07, 8:37 am |
| And the answer is....
How many targets can be configured for the DFS root and DFS links?
E.)None of the above
There are no hard-coded limits for the number of DFS root and link targets that can be configured for a domain or stand-alone DFS. However, large DFS configurations can cause significant increased network traffic originating from updates made to roots, links, and targets. How large the namespace must be before it begins to affect the network is unknown, but problems have occurred when the amount of data, determined by the number of roots, links, and targets in the DFS namespace, reaches 5 megabytes (MB).
I'll post a new one later today.  | |
| adam salam 2003-07-07, 12:19 pm |
| quote: Originally posted by mrfixit
And the answer is....
How many targets can be configured for the DFS root and DFS links?
E.)None of the above
There are no hard-coded limits for the number of DFS root and link targets that can be configured for a domain or stand-alone DFS. However, large DFS configurations can cause significant increased network traffic originating from updates made to roots, links, and targets. How large the namespace must be before it begins to affect the network is unknown, but problems have occurred when the amount of data, determined by the number of roots, links, and targets in the DFS namespace, reaches 5 megabytes (MB).
I'll post a new one later today.
From W2K help:
-------------
Adding a Dfs link
Currently, the maximum number of Dfs links that you can assign to a Dfs root is 1000.
The maximum number of Dfs shared folders allowed in a set of shared folders is 32.
please explain!!! | |
| mrfixit 2003-07-07, 12:48 pm |
| quote: Originally posted by adam salam
From W2K help:
-------------
Adding a Dfs link
Currently, the maximum number of Dfs links that you can assign to a Dfs root is 1000.
The maximum number of Dfs shared folders allowed in a set of shared folders is 32.
please explain!!!
From M$:
quote: Resource: Maximum number of links in a stand-alone DFS
Limit: No hard coded limit. 30,000 links within supported limits; Operating System boot time and DFS Snap-in performance degrade beyond this number. Server response time to referrals not impacted. 100,000 links tested by Microsoft Development but not recommended for production deployments as boot time represents denial of service.
In domain-based DFS, the DFS namespace, which includes the DFS root, the links, and the root and link replicas and their site information, is stored as one object in Active Directory. Microsoft recommends that administrators limit the size of this object to 5 MB. Exceeding this size can cause certain administrative actions to not work, such as adding links or adding link replicas.
Also, check this out:
http://support.microsoft.com/defaul...ben-us%3b232613
And scroll down to the Windows 2000 section.
Should clear it up. | |
| adam salam 2003-07-07, 1:37 pm |
| quote: Originally posted by mrfixit
From M$:
Also, check this out:
http://support.microsoft.com/defaul...ben-us%3b232613
And scroll down to the Windows 2000 section.
Should clear it up.
Thanks, seems to be the help files where updated, and the help shipped with windows2000 outdated !!! |
|
|
|
|