| Author |
RAS & RADIUS Question
|
|
| zarcoff 2001-11-16, 8:27 am |
| What is the advantage of a RADIUS server over a RAS useing PPP and PAP and CHAP.
thanks all | |
| MadChef 2001-11-16, 8:45 am |
| CHAP and PAP are PPP authentication methods and are unrelated to RADIUS. RADIUS is the protocol the RAS server could use with a server to verify the username/password combo arrived at using the ppp authentication method.
Imagine it more like this:
Dialer -> PAP/CHAP -> RAS box -> Radius -> Server w/ user database running radius
MadChef | |
| zarcoff 2001-11-19, 5:15 am |
| Thanks MADCHEF
Could you explain very basic, how you get round the ARP implactions when using NAT.
thanks
zarcoff | |
| MadChef 2001-11-19, 5:29 am |
| What implications?
MC | |
| zarcoff 2001-11-21, 5:26 am |
| firstly thanks MADCHEF
I was wrong about implications, but i can't get my head round NAT fully, could you explain.
why use ARP entries when useing NAT in the local.arp directory on NT.
and a genral explaintion of NAT and there modes please.
thanks | |
| MadChef 2001-11-21, 6:57 am |
| You should probably start an additional thread on NAT with Checkpoint. I'm a CP neophyte and am not especially well versed on the particulars of the way Checkpoint does NAT, aside from the basics.
Sorry, but if I answered I would invariably answer poorly, if not outright incorrectly. 
MC | |
| zarcoff 2001-11-21, 9:12 am |
| thanks madchef i should always go to CP first, i was being lazy.
thanks |
|
|
|