|
Home > Archive > CCIE > April 2002 > "Darth Reid" Redistribution?
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
"Darth Reid" Redistribution?
|
|
| kpsalami 2002-04-05, 11:26 am |
| What is up with "Darth Reid" redistribution
in CCIE practical Studies??
I had no need to redistribute any of IGP's.
EIGRP and IGRP, auto-redistribute.
The solution shows mutual OSPF,IGRP,EIGRP
and,.....on rtr2 they include all interfaces in the OSPF network statements?
I need feed back on this one...please!
The solution for "DARTH REID" is posted at
www.ciscopress.com/1587200023 and go to downloads.
Help
kpsalami./ | |
| darthfeces 2002-04-05, 6:38 pm |
| i've heard many comlaints about
darth_reid on groupstudy for that reason,
i'm going to skip it. | |
|
| -R1(Hub), R3 and R4 - OSPF Area 0
-R1 to R2 - IGRP
-Mutual redistribution of OSPF and IGRP on R1 so R2 can see the OSPF routes and vice-versa.
The book says R1's ethernet should be in the IGRP domain and EIGRP should include R1, VLAN2 and R4 Ring 1(already specified to be in OSPF Area 30) . Use the same AS number in IGRP and EIGRP so you have automatic redistribution.
R3, R6 and R2's Ethernet is running RIP and configure mutual redistribution on R3.
HTH | |
|
| Book's Errata:
Page 1150 – Statement #2 at the top of the page should read, “Configure EIGRP between R1, VLAN 2, and R4 Ring 1 and provide connectivity via EIGRP”. | |
| kpsalami 2002-04-06, 6:56 pm |
| I was hoping you would reply to this(Darthfeces). Any relationship to Darth Reid?
Ok, Answer me this then,
<SAME RTR>
IGRP 133.10.X.X
OSPF 133.10.10.X
OSPF 133.10.11.X
no protocol 133.10.x.x
All we want to do is accociate IGRP
with one interface, but, FLSM automatically
places all 133.10.x.x nets/interfaces in
IGRP. When mutual redistribution is implemented, look out for the route flapping!!! Extensive Route-maps??
Is that the approach?
Darth Reid presents this issue, but fails
to answer it. Or, is the answer add all 133.10.x.x nets to OSPF as well.
I'm petrified, at this point, in having this
presented on my LAB Exam/San Jose and being
dead in the water chasing the flapping.
Help....
Kpsalami
 | |
| darthfeces 2002-04-06, 8:03 pm |
| no,
we're not related that seems to be the other side of the family ! | |
| darthfeces 2002-04-06, 8:03 pm |
| no,
we're not related
that must be the other side of the family ! | |
| kpsalami 2002-04-06, 9:14 pm |
| If I can help you up, let me know.
Now then, are you standing on the
"i won't address this", or,
you don't know? :} I'm kidding
and trying to provoke a response.
Q, On a single router, is there a
way to prevent IGRP from accepting
networks that fall into the same major
network in the (rtr config#> )network
statement. Will a distribution-list in
without an [interface] option and associated to a deny acl work? Maybe I should try it
a let you know...
Peace,
Kpsalami | |
|
| -use "passive-interface" on IGRP
-route-map/distribute-list to control unwanted routes from being advertised.
IGRP has lower AD than OSPF so IGRP will inject back all the learned routes to the redistributing router. | |
| kpsalami 2002-04-07, 12:16 am |
| Cool, I've got the solution for Darth_Reid igp redistribution. It's all on RTR 1 except
for rtr2 redistr conn into OSPF.
I had to completely ignore the Skynet Labs
solution and go with the labs requierments.
I'm still not sure if OSPF is supposed to configured between rtr1 and rtr2. Oh well,
I'll do it both ways.
If anyone cares I can send it to them?
We all know Darthfeces doesn't. :]
He's fallen and he can't get it up.
HA HA...
Thanks POKS!
\.Kpsalami |
|
|
|
|