| Author |
Take Linux+ Friday
|
|
| rwhite59 2002-08-12, 9:40 pm |
| I am scheduled to take the Linux+ exam friday. Any last minute tips? | |
| william_kk_ho 2002-08-13, 12:35 am |
| Work with cheatsheet.net's practice exam. because cheatsheet.net's questions are very similar to the real exam.
Wish you good luck!! | |
| Boulware5 2002-08-13, 11:07 am |
| "All our guides are 100% Actual Exam Questions" Ain't that a braindump product.  | |
| Mr. Linux Guy 2002-08-15, 10:00 am |
| Brush up on your hardware. The L+ goes heavily on it. | |
| Bingram 2002-08-16, 7:16 am |
| quote:
Originally posted by Boulware5
"All our guides are 100% Actual Exam Questions" Ain't that a braindump product.
Careful, I caught a lot of flak in the A+ area while helping someone out and mentioning that the "guides" tend to be more more like braindumps and less like real reference material.
Just listen to this claim from one vendor:
<<These questions closely resemble the actual questions you will see on the CompTIA exams.>>
In English please. Closely resemble? How closely resemble? Change a few words?
If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck.... | |
| Supertech 2002-08-16, 9:45 am |
| If a study guide/vendor makes it to this site * by virtue of the Webmaster*, I will not quibble.
The drainbump issue has been discussed to death elsewhere. Let's not belabor the point here.
Thanks | |
| Bingram 2002-08-16, 11:20 am |
| Still dodges the central issue. If it is a close replica of the real test, then call it what it is. If you call something a "study guide" then I expect to have a package of reference material that not only will discuss the main test topics, but also serve as a handy desk reference in the real world.
Instead most of the "guides" advertized and advocated here are just lists of questions, some with a basic explaination. And none of which would ever find their way onto the reference shelf at a work desk.
Call 'em what they are. | |
| Mr. Linux Guy 2002-08-16, 12:00 pm |
| quote:
Originally posted by Bingram
Still dodges the central issue. If it is a close replica of the real test, then call it what it is. If you call something a "study guide" then I expect to have a package of reference material that not only will discuss the main test topics, but also serve as a handy desk reference in the real world.
Instead most of the "guides" advertized and advocated here are just lists of questions, some with a basic explaination. And none of which would ever find their way onto the reference shelf at a work desk.
Call 'em what they are.
OK, fine, they're braindumps. |
|
|
|