Home > Archive > Linux/Unix > June 2002 > Terrorists can hack Linux more easily than Windows





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Terrorists can hack Linux more easily than Windows
Supertech

2002-06-07, 8:29 am

NEWS
The Alexis de Toqueville Institution (ADTI), a conservative Washington research organization (think tank), is set to issue a paper outlining reasons that Linux might be more easily compromised by terrorists, and urging the American government to step back and have a "national debate" on the viability of Open Source vs. proprietary software and its security.

the rest of the story...

http://www.geek.com/news/geeknews/2...20607012085.htm

another instance of Microsoft's marketing machine at work again, only this time in stealth mode.
ccieToBe

2002-06-07, 9:06 am

"The paper further suggests that the Microsoft operating systems are ideal candidates for running government computer networks due to the fact that HR managers have stated that 87% of people holding MCSE certifications are either equally or more successful than college graduates."

Huh? So I guess Plan9 is an even better candidate because IBM makes hard drives.
The VMS Kid

2002-06-07, 9:15 am

Just ask yourself which has a hostory of being more insecure: Linux or Windows?
wildscribe

2002-06-07, 12:32 pm

This makes no sense at all. Whenever you hear of a virus it almost always has to do with a Microsoft product. In fact, I would bet that 80 percent of all viruses are designed to take advantage of MS Outlook and Outlook Express. I am sure this will change as more folks start using Linux, but to claim that Linux is more open to viruses than a Microsoft OS because Linux is open source is crap. Microsoft has proven that you don't need access to source code to make nasty viruses.

I wonder how much money Microsoft donates to this Alexis de Toqueville Institution. I think there is something strange going on behind this study.

- Wild
Boulware5

2002-06-07, 12:48 pm

Bottom line: M$ is more insecure no matter what any BS article says.
neuralfx

2002-06-07, 9:12 pm

This is a similar thing to what happened to a Peruvian Congressman .. I URGE anyone who has not read it to please check it out .. this would actaully be a good answer to that "finding" .. it raises many issues ..

http://www.pimientolinux.com/peru2m...ueva_to_ms.html


-neural
The VMS Kid

2002-06-10, 6:56 am

http://www.nsa.gov/selinux/index.html
Sponsored Links





Free Braindumps | MCSE braindumps software forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 examnotes.net