| Author |
221 instead of 219
|
|
|
| somebody think this is a good idea? | |
|
| I am mainly because the 216 material is still pretty fresh in my head and Windows 2000 Network Infrastructure interests me a lot more than Active Directory. 
I'm finding 221 to just be a straight forward re-hash of the 216 material. So if you are comfortable with your knowledge of 216 material, I would take it instead of 219.
But I'm sure the same argument could be made for 217 and 219. | |
|
| quote:
Originally posted by Spid
I am mainly because the 216 material is still pretty fresh in my head and Windows 2000 Network Infrastructure interests me a lot more than Active Directory.
I'm finding 221 to just be a straight forward re-hash of the 216 material. So if you are comfortable with your knowledge of 216 material, I would take it instead of 219.
But I'm sure the same argument could be made for 217 and 219.
thanks for your repply.
i understand more the network infrastructure concepts compared with AD issues..........
and i prefer to get knowledge on network enviroments because i like Network stuff!!!!!!
what do you think? | |
|
| quote:
Originally posted by cm2gj
thanks for your repply.
i understand more the network infrastructure concepts compared with AD issues..........
and i prefer to get knowledge on network enviroments because i like Network stuff!!!!!!
what do you think?
I think you and I like the same stuff.
I going with 221, I think you should too! | |
|
| quote:
Originally posted by Spid
I think you and I like the same stuff.
I going with 221, I think you should too!
perfect!!
i`m reading all the material on the MOC book and i have now the 221 trascender!!!  |
|
|
|