|
Home > Archive > 70-217 > May 2002 > 70-217 DNS to Go or not to Go
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
70-217 DNS to Go or not to Go
|
|
| fathead137 2002-05-31, 12:36 pm |
| After reading below question "actions taken" i.e.
- In the zone Properties dialog box, set Allow Dynamic updates option to Yes Indicates IXFR which minimizes zone transfer traffic and administrative overhead since all zones will update. "I would have chosen (C) also as an answer. How do you perceive it ?" See actions below:
Tom takes the following actions:
Create a standard primary zone.
In the zone Properties dialog box, set Allow Dynamic updates option to Yes.
Create and assign an IPSec policy that encrypts all DNS traffic between the DNS servers.
Which goals are accomplished with these actions (Choose all that apply)?
A. DNS zone transfer traffic will be minimized on the network.
B. All zone transfer information will be secured as it crosses the network.
C. Administrative overhead for maintaining DNS zone files will be minimized.
D. All zone updates will come only from authorized DNS servers.
E. Unauthorized host computers will not have records created in the zone
Correct answers:ABD, why not C also. Can someone shed light on this ? | |
| CyberDude 2002-05-31, 3:06 pm |
| I believe it is because the admin has to setup the transfers. If it were AD Integrated, then the transfers are handled by AD and not the admin.  | |
| Zaraspook 2002-05-31, 9:52 pm |
| I concur with CyberDude, he's hit the nail on the head!  | |
| fathead137 2002-05-31, 10:10 pm |
| Thank you all in advance for your replies. |
|
|
|
|