| Author |
Spid's Wed (11/27) Win2k Pro. QoD
|
|
|
| Here's a tricky little one 
You have a small office with 9 networked Windows 2000 Profesional computers and 1 Windows 2000 Server functioning as a simple workgroup. There are no DHCP or DNS servers.
You need to provide users with Internet access. Each Windows 2000 Professional computer has been configured as a DHCP client.
On your Windows 2000 Server, you already have a high-speed connection to the Internet. How can you configure your environment to provide users with Internet access with the least amount of administrative overhead? (Select the best choice)
A. Install and configure Routing and Remote Access on your server to provide NAT.
B. Install and configure Routing and Remote Access on your server to allow routing of all IP traffic.
C. On the Sharing tab for the Internet connection, select Enable Internet Connection Sharing For This Connection check box.
D. Configure an ISA (Inetenet Security and Acceleration) server to provide Internet connection services to the clients.
Good luck and see you tomorrow for the answer!! | |
| deltree 2002-11-27, 8:28 am |
| C. | |
| Deja-vue 2002-11-27, 10:25 am |
| going with A
ICS sucks!
NAT rules!
however, the correct M$ Answer is mostlikely C. ( least administrative effort), but in a real environment, i would always go with NAT.
just my $0.02
| |
| Slinky 2002-11-27, 11:11 am |
| I'm going with C. Microsoft wants you to use NAT when DHCP and DNS already exist in your network. | |
| NetChild1985 2002-11-27, 11:17 am |
| "C" is the answer, but same as Deja-vue I'd use NAT. | |
|
| (C) is my answer
I guess with only 10 clients using ICS is no big deal but i have to agree with Deja and Netchild setting up the server as a NAT would be a lot better. | |
| soccer4net 2002-11-27, 11:41 am |
| C, but I agree with everyone else, although its not recommended to run 3 different major services on the same server, with just 10 clients I dont think it would be a problem. | |
| hairy51 2002-11-27, 1:43 pm |
| my first reaction was C. I haven't really gone to far into NAT yet. | |
| OmnipotentOne 2002-11-27, 2:59 pm |
| I like nat, he's a good guy, however I went with C cause it would appear to have the least administrative overhead. | |
| namrak 2002-11-27, 8:21 pm |
| Yeah, I believe the answer would be (C) as well, but I agree with Deja. NAT is better technology whether through software or hardware. | |
| adam salam 2002-11-28, 5:53 am |
| answer "C", I haven't Sufficient knowledge so far in NAT yet. | |
|
| quote:
Originally posted by Spid
Here's a tricky little one
You have a small office with 9 networked Windows 2000 Profesional computers and 1 Windows 2000 Server functioning as a simple workgroup. There are no DHCP or DNS servers.
You need to provide users with Internet access. Each Windows 2000 Professional computer has been configured as a DHCP client.
On your Windows 2000 Server, you already have a high-speed connection to the Internet. How can you configure your environment to provide users with Internet access with the least amount of administrative overhead? (Select the best choice)
A. Install and configure Routing and Remote Access on your server to provide NAT.
B. Install and configure Routing and Remote Access on your server to allow routing of all IP traffic.
C. On the Sharing tab for the Internet connection, select Enable Internet Connection Sharing For This Connection check box.
D. Configure an ISA (Inetenet Security and Acceleration) server to provide Internet connection services to the clients.
Good luck and see you tomorrow for the answer!!
You guys are good!
And the answer is.....C
Implmeneting ICS will give all the clients Internet access with the least amount oof administrative effort. Because the Windows 2000 client computers have been configured to receive their IP address from a DHCP server and there is no other DHCP server on the network. The clients computers will receive their IP address from the DHCP allocator included with ICS.
Although NAT would work as well. It requires significantly more configuration than ICS.
An ISA server would work as well but it is purchased seperately and requires much more configuration than ICS. |
|
|
|