|
|
| cyberphreak 2001-03-11, 8:26 pm |
| I am using the Sybex book s for the Core components and was wondering to those of you that have taken the test and have used the edgetest software...is it any good. I am scoring fairly high on it and was wondering on the accuracy of the tests. Anyone else using these tests? What do you think of them? | |
|
|
|
| Nobody here has used the Sybec series for studying? Man. | |
|
| Hi cyberphreak,
Well you were sounding kinda lonely in here
Edgetest software? I've never heard of that one. What is there website? Personally I've never used Sybex books, one of my classmates used the 70-216 one and didn't like it, said that it really didn't go into details enough. But other people I've talked to liked them.
| |
|
| Not sure off hand what their web site is. It came with the books. I have the trancenders as well and have been using that along with the Edge tests. | |
|
| Well transcenders are good. I find that once I am scoring in the high 900's I usually feel good and ready. I make sure that I mix up the answers though in the options, since it is really easy to memorize which ones are right. When you use transc. make sure you use the explanations, they are great, be sure you know why the answer is right and why the others are wrong. Are edgetests in the same format?
When do you plan on writing the test? | |
|
| Edgetest are the same pretty much as trancenders. Don't seem as wordy though. I haven't really used trancenders before as I used Petri testing software when I wrote Server NT4. I plan on writing in about two weeks. I am getting between 70 and 88% when testing. Just some stuff I have to wrap up and get straight. Have you written yet? | |
|
| Yup, I am actually studying for my last exam, 70-221 which apparently is really beastly. Hence me not studying right now.
From what my poor tired brain recalls 210 was pretty straight forward, 215 is a little harder. | |
|
| Thanks for the info. I'll let you know how I do. Good luck the rest of the way out. |
|
|
|