|
Home > Archive > 70-210 > March 2001 > ICS question
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
|
|
| shaxx 2001-03-05, 10:17 am |
| These 2 are really bugging me and I can’t find a definitive answer for them.
Your desktop Computer has Windows 2000 Professional installed. You create a new dial-up connection to connect to the Internet. You configure the Internet connection to
enable Internet Connection Sharing.
After you configure the connection, you cannot see or connect to any shared resources on your local network. You want your computer to be able to connect to shared resources.
What should you do?
A. Configure the dial-up connection to disable shared access.
B. Configure the dial-up connection to disable on-demand dialing.
C. Disable data encryption in the new dial-up connection.
D. Use the ipconfig command to release and renew your network TCP/P address.
ANS:A
Can somebody explain this? In some study sources I've seen the answer be A and in others D.
I would think it would be A. Configure the dial-up connection to disable
Because the question didn’t mention anything about N.A.T. or a DHCP server……” WHEN YOU START INTERNET CONNECTION SHARING THE OS PUTS ITSELF IN (MAKE BELIVE) DHCP AND DNS SERVER.”
I guess Answer D: WOULD BE CORRECT IF THE NEWORK HAD A FULL BLOWN DHCP SERVER RUNNING.
So if I see that question on the test will A be correct?
Here is another question I’ve seen that has really been bugging me.
You are the administrator of a Windows 2000 network. You are preparing to upgrade a computer running Windows NT Workstation 4.0 to Windows 2000 Professional. What must you do?
a. Run Chkdsk
b. Install Service Pack 5
c. Disable disk compression
d. Remove all antivirus software
Where I found the question the Answer is D. The explanation was…”Some might be lured into choosing B but remember you only need to have SP 4 or higher installed when you are dual booting with NT and W2K. NT Service Pak 4 is able to access NTFS 5 volumes”…..This is somebody else’s answer. Are they correct? The question didn’t say anything about having SP 4 already installed. I would think the answer should be B because without an upgrade, be it 4 or 5, your NT 4 system will be screwed.
Thanks for the suggestions. | |
|
| The first question is funky and whoever wrote it should be shot. I wouldn't worry about any questions like that. The second question would be D, because the question states you are upgrading, not dual booting. Antivirus software must be disabled during the upgrade, or it will fail. By default, the file system will be left intact by any upgrade unless the partition you are upgrading to is NTFS at the time of upgrade. It will be automaticly converted to ntfs 5.0. | |
|
| Re. this question:
"You are the administrator of a Windows 2000 network. You are preparing to upgrade a computer running Windows NT Workstation 4.0 to Windows 2000 Professional. What must you do?
a. Run Chkdsk Duff answer not required at all
b. Install Service Pack 5 You are correct the only criteria is have SP 4 or greater installed for NTFS partitions to be recognised
c. Disable disk compression Duff answer not required at all
d. Remove all Antivirus software" 
D. is the only possible answer Thumbs up sablackspot 
Re this question:
"Your desktop Computer has Windows 2000 Professional installed. You create a new dial-up connection to connect to the Internet. You configure the Internet connection to
enable Internet Connection Sharing.
After you configure the connection, you cannot see or connect to any shared resources on your local network. You want your computer to be able to connect to shared resources.
What should you do?
A. Configure the dial-up connection to disable shared access.
B. Configure the dial-up connection to disable on-demand dialing. This is a Duff Ans because you are trying to create a SHARED INTERNET Connection which would require Dial-on-Demand
C. Disable data encryption in the new dial-up connection. Has no relevance to this issue therefore DUFF
D. Use the ipconfig command to release and renew your network TCP/P address." 
I found this on Technet:
"Windows 2000 NAT and Internet Connection Sharing
Windows 2000 includes a simplified version of a NAT named Internet Connection Sharing (ICS). ICS can be enabled on the Sharing tab in the properties of a connection in Network and Dial-up Connections. The most significant differences between NAT and ICS are the following:
ICS does not allow any configuration beyond specifying a dial-up connection to use and configuring Internet applications that respond on ports other than the port of the initial connection request. Neither the ICS DHCP allocator nor DNS proxy can be disabled. Therefore, you cannot use ICS in an Active Directory environment or where standalone DHCP servers are used.
ICS supports only a single private network segment, while NAT supports multiple private network segments.
URL:http://www.microsoft.com/TechNet/cableguy/default.asp
SO logically if ICS uses a pseudo DHCP & DNS server it is feaseable that the IP Address it has assigned itself is not in the IP Address/subnet range of your network!!! so I would choose answer D based on this information, answer "A" would restore youre conectivity however you still have failed to create an ICS configuration for the rest of the network!!!
I'm not 100% on this answer so you may be best placed to ask Cadman or Freak for there opinion
Yeti the 95% sure | |
|
| Having installed ICS on this PC (Win2k Proff SP1) I saw that when you set it up for "Sharing" it changes the IP address to 192.168.0.1 which was not on my IP Subnet range However I was able to change it back in the network properties so that it could then see the whole network again
So the only plausible answer to question 1 is :
D. Use the ipconfig command to release and renew your network TCP/IP address.
As I highlighted above
Yeti the Satisfied and 100% sure of the answer | |
|
| I disagree! I have ICS on a home network and when I run the "IPCONFIG /RENEW" I get an error:"No adapters bound to TCP/IP are enabled for DHCP." | |
|
| ICS supports only a single private network segment, while NAT supports multiple private network segments.
And that single private network segment would be...? Maybe 192.168....?
If I was already on a network accessing shares on the network, I would not want to configure the Internet connection to enable Internet Connection Sharing. But is disabling ICS the same as disabling shared access?
The install will try to access the MBR, and your anti-virus software should stop it. Heck, I've run defrag with McAfee running. Locked the machine down. Had to hit the button. | |
|
| The only possible answer is A. Turn off ICS. You might be able to modify the IP address of the server to a 169.254.*.* and continue to use ICS and access network resources. You aren't, most likely, going to use ICS in a business environment. It is more of a convenience feature from our friends at Microsoft. |
|
|
|
|