|
|
| merav21 2001-12-06, 2:58 pm |
| has anyone used to the transcenders for 70-210? I used them for server and they were good for that, however, the questions I've encountered on the pro transcender seem too easy. I haven't seen one question on Novell and only a couple on RIS(which I heard there is alot of on the exam).
Any insight? | |
| jdoran 2001-12-06, 3:26 pm |
| Microsoft doesn't care about Novell. I have taken 4 tests and none of them had anything about Novell on them. I don't recall having very many RIS questions on the 70-210. You'll see a lot more RIS questions on the 70-215. | |
| merav21 2001-12-06, 4:00 pm |
| i did see questions about novell on 70-215. there only only 2 or 3 though, pertaining to frame type and gateway/client services for netware.
Andrew | |
| merav21 2001-12-06, 5:01 pm |
| i guess my question still is, how good is transcender for the 70-210 i may try cert21.com also, anyone have any opinions about their questions?? | |
| jdoran 2001-12-06, 5:38 pm |
| I used the 70-210 transcender to identify areas where I needed a little work. The transcenders do a good job of explaining why an answer is what it is. They also do a good job on wording questions the way they will be worded on the exam. I think the transcender is a good tool to use for the 70-210, but only after you have studied.
Also, you are correct about those Novell questions...I forgot about those. That is as deep as I have seen Microsoft go into Novell. | |
| merav21 2001-12-06, 10:36 pm |
| thanks for the reply, I only use transcenders after studying also, to me it would be a waste of a certification otherwise....and yes, the explanations in transcender are always very good. | |
| merav21 2001-12-06, 10:45 pm |
| thanks for the reply, I only use transcenders after studying also, to me it would be a waste of a certification otherwise....and yes, the explanations in transcender are always very good. |
|
|
|