Home > Archive > CCNP > August 2003 > Summarizing within an Octet





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Summarizing within an Octet
JayDot

2003-08-06, 10:06 am

Ip addresses Summarization

Is there a Link or a Method to Summarize Routes....


172.16.1.64
172.16.1.80
172.16.1.96
172.16.1.112
Summarize too
172.16.1.64/26 WHY???

I understand the first 24 Bits Match + 2 More to Get to 64 = 26 Bits
172.16.1.64 (01 000000) /26

Summarize
172.16.1.192
172.16.1.208

172.16.1.192 (11 000000)/27

I got the first 24 But why 3 More Bits
to make it 27 rather then two more bits to make it 26
Townsend

2003-08-06, 5:11 pm

JayDot,
It is easier to understand if you look at these numbers in binary.
.64 is 01000000
.80 is 01010000
.96 is 01100000
.112 is 01110000
The first 2 places are what they have in common, that is why the summary address will have 2 added to the 24 to make 26.

In your second case
.192 is 11000000
.208 is 11010000
Here they have the first 3 places in common and therefor the 27.

I hope this helps.
Best of Luck!
dragon113

2003-08-07, 12:03 am

Hi!

I agreee with Townsend, but I have one more question. In CCNP BSCI Exam Certification Guide by Cisco Press it ask:
Which OSPF command best summarizes the network 172.30.65.0, 172.30.66.0 and 172.30.69.0 for advertisement to an other area:
a) area 1 range 172.30.64.0 255.255.255.0
b) summary-address 172.30.64.0 255.255.192.0
c) summary-address 172.30.64.0 255.255.255.0
d) area 1 range 172.30.64.0 255.255.192.0

Because of this advertisement between areas, so I chose "area" command and the answer "d" is most correct. But I think the subnet mask shoud be 255.255.248.0 instead of 255.255.192.0 because 65 and 69 have 5 bit in common
Sponsored Links





Free Braindumps | MCSE braindumps software forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 examnotes.net